Posts Tagged ‘ian-bell’

Mixed feelings about defeat

Posted 2 months ago — by Rich Abbott

Twenty-first time lucky: Shafiul celebrates

I’ve always said it. No one beats Bangladesh 21 times in a row.

Listening to the last over of Saturday’s game on TMS was a strange experience. Ever since that glorious day in Cardiff, Bangladesh have been my second team (though I recognise it’s something of a cop out to choose a team which have – until now at least – posed so little a threat). Still, I’ve followed their progress, willed them to succeed and delighted in their mini-metamorphosis into the new Pakistan (captaincy changing hands, bonkers retirements, cavalier approach to Test cricket…)

At around 18:30 on Saturday evening, England stood on the brink of their own Cardiff experience. As the only major nation never to have lost to Bangladesh, it had to happen sometime. Ten runs needed from the last over, one batsman in form, one in a cast; the tension was palpable, my feelings mixed.

I wanted England to win. I always do. But I really didn’t want Bangladesh to lose, especially as they’d just ripped out the stumps and tasted victory, only for Ian Bell to appear looking like a baddie from Dr Who. Defeat at this stage would have been devastating – even for a side so accustomed to losing – which is why I was oddly relieved when the ball nestled in Jahurul Islam’s gloves via the bat of Jonathan Trott.

A great team performance, I was delighted for the Bangladeshis and found defeat disconcertingly easy to stomach. Providing, of course, that we win today.

Cape Town: day two

Posted 8 months ago — by Rich Abbott

The Cape Town breeze has a habit of stealing your hat from your head and making you look silly by flying off again every time you bend down to pick it up. England experienced a day like that today: every time they looked to be catching up with South Africa, their progress was halted by the loss of a wicket.

The day started well, with South Africa only able to add 12 to their overnight score. But wickets fell with frustrating regularity during England’s innings, with hard-fought partnerships shattered as they entered the middle-ground somewhere between decent and very useful. Steyn and Morkel exploited the pitch well, and Morkel in particular looks to be back on top of his game.

The biggest plus of England’s day, was arguably the continued resurgence of Alastair Cook, who made 65. He, more than anyone, looks to have benefitted from the wisdom of Graham Gooch, who joined up with the squad for a short stretch earlier on the tour. Today Cook gave a thorough demonstration of his job description: to bat in an obdurate manner, value his wicket and time in the middle above all else and to support his teammates – a more flashy, entertaining breed.

So he fell some way short of three figures, which should of course feature somewhere on the job spec, but he did offer stubborn resistance. He no longer looks like a walking wicket, and since the first Test, he’s looked – as he did when he burst onto the scene – like he’s made for Test cricket. His first boundary was greeted with a blast of “I’m a believer” by the stadium stereo. By sticking with him, England have shown they clearly are believers, and the way he bided his time, wasn’t afraid to leave the ball and stuck around for just under four hours, shows why.

For a while it looked like a Cook and Bell story was brewing, but it wasn’t to be. Both will be disappointed with the manner of their dismissals, not least because of the hard work they wasted. But Bell too played well for his 48. No doubt the same old accusations will be levelled at him, but having entered the fray with England in trouble, he did at least depart with the scoreline 101 runs healthier.

When stumps were called, England looked once again to be just catching up with their hat. Swann and Prior are capable of overtaking it tomorrow morning. The pitch is offering a fine contest between bat and ball, and another exciting day beckons.

Not England’s number 3

Posted last year, mid-August — by Richard Seeckts

Apropos of nothing, while Ian Bell waits five hours to go in at 260-1 tomorrow he can ponder some anagrams of the chaps he sneaked past to get the job:

Under rated Ramps is Darn! Purest dream

Robert Key is OK, try beer

and of course Ravi Bopara is Bravo! A pair

Pietersen out of the Ashes

Posted last year, at the end of July — by Will

Flippety hell. “Big game” Ian Bell, come on down.

Belly: The Art Of Catpaincy

Posted last year, at the start of July — by Alan Tyers

It was really good being captain of the England Lions side this week ‘cos I got to do tossing a coin and telling people where to stand and in the dressing room I even got my own special captain’s seat like James T Kirk and I got a bit of paper and sellotape and I wrote “Ian Bell Catpain” on it so people would know it was my special seat but I realised that I hadn’t spelled it as good as I might have done so I tried to go over it with tippex but that never really worked too well so in the end it just said “Ian Bell Ca-blobble” you know like sort of a smudged smeary thing.

Mr Miller that’s in charge of selectioning come in the dressing room and he looks at the special captain’s seat and he says: “starts out looking very nice but goes to pieces pretty quickly” and he made a little note in his notebook so I don’t know if that’s good or bad really but all I can do is keep focused and keep scoring runs for my county and keep working hard on my spelling.

I was also in charge of choosing all the food that we would have for tea so I got alphabetti spaghetti AND chicken nuggets but I couldn’t decide if we should have ice-cream for pudding or Angel Delight and I guess that’s what they talk about when they say that part of leadership is making the hard choices. At the end of the day, ice-cream’s record speaks for itself so I’ve gone with that.

Tossing the coin was pretty cool as well. I walked out there with Ricky Ponting and we were having a bit of banter, like two prize fighters sizing each other up you might say. I says: “Heads or tails, Ricky?” and he says “Did you get that coin out of your piggy bank you little pommie squit?” but Ian Bell is a much more composeder cricketer than the one that admittedly had a tough baptism of fire against Australia in the early days of his international career and I looked him right in the eye, well not exactly, but I looked at the ground where he was standing, and I says: “Actually I don’t have a piggy bank anymore” and he knew he was in a streetfight right away.

Alan Tyers rifled through Ian Bell’s gmail account

No Vaughan, no Harmy, but Monty makes it

Posted last year, at the end of June — by Will

All rather predictable, I felt – England’s squad announcement, that is. But one man’s name did surprise me: Monty Panesar. He’s been flayed all around Division 2 of the Championship like a particularly forlorn-looking rag doll, and with his batting as sadly inept as it is, will England really risk him at Cardiff? Given Adil Rashid’s impressive pluck shown in the World Twenty20, he could well get a game alongside Graeme Swann for the first Test. Though as a colleague said today, plonking such a young bloke in to make his debut against the Aussies is a quickfire way to kill his confidence and ruin him for years. It’ll make or break him, but I’d rather see his name than Monty and his 70mph rockets, and hapless fielding, and putting it in the right (or wrong) areas (singular – there is only one area)… etc.

Ian Bell, meanwhile, has been told to grow up with his elevation to captaincy of the England Lions – a good decision. It’ll be absolutely fascinating to see how he reacts to it, how he manages the likes of Harmison (selected for the Lions, but not for the main pre-Ashes squad).

Your thoughts?

Flower’s unflinching message

Posted last year, at the end of April — by Will

Today’s squad announcement was the first by Andy Flower in his official capacity as England coach. And what a statement of intent it was. All the pre-series talk has been of Michael Vaughan, Ian Bell and Owais Shah all battling for the No.3 slot. All three were acknowledged, their names noted down, before scrunching up the paper and tossing it dismissively out of the window. Ravi Bopara is the new No.3 in possession, which is bold enough in itself.

But perhaps the most telling indication of the new regime came from Geoff Miller, the national selector. When asked about Bell, he was almost dismissive about his non-selection, in spite of the runs Bell has scored so far domestically. “We need to get him even more passionate about playing…so he doesn’t lose his place again,” Miller retorted. There are enough clues in what Miller says to indicate that England really aren’t happy with Bell, for a whole host of reasons. You’ll have noticed Bell’s put on a bit of weight, recently – muscle weight – and this is another sign of a man not happy in his own skin. He should be (and will be, I’m sure, eventually) the side’s leading batsman and the heaviest of run-scorers, but his path to achieving that is obstructed by his own insecurities. Only Everestian quantities of runs, and other off-the-field indications as to his hunger, will get him back in.

And this is all good news for England. It’s high time all this indecision and reverting to the old guard was put to one side. Having said that, it still seems implausible that the side which takes to the field next Wednesday will be the same one to take on Australia in Cardiff later this summer.

The highs and lows of England’s winter

Posted last year, mid-April — by Mark Tilley

So England’s winter is finally over and after events in St. Lucia last Friday, a slight gloss has been applied to what was otherwise a woeful away season. Captaincy changes, managerial controversy and some truly dire results had left many writing off England in all formats of the game and, arguably, those critics were fully justified in their prognosis. But the one day series win against West Indies has altered the balance just a tad and will provide England fans with a cruel glimmer of hope and optimism.

With the home series return with the West Indies just weeks away, there is hardly any time for reflection on what state English cricket is in. But we can all try our best to analyse so let us have a brief look at the successes and failures of England’s mostly winless winter.

Successes:

Andrew Strauss – The main man. Strauss’ resurgence as one of England’s most important batsman started way back in early December with those twin centuries in Chennai against India, becoming the 10th Englishman in history to register three figures in both innings of a Test match. Elevated to the captaincy in the wake of the Kevin Pietersen/Peter Moores scandal, Strauss’ batting went on leaps and bounds as he blasted three big hundreds in consecutive games during the run fest against the West Indies. But it was in the one day arena where he really impressed both as a captain and batsman. With critics from all corners doubting his limited overs technique, Strauss scored a backs-to-the-wall hundred in Guyana before a rapid, match-winning 79 not out saw his team home in Barbados. England’s series win will be a huge fillip for Strauss as he looks to build on the slow progress his team are making.

Paul Collingwood – For a man who is supposedly on the brink of being dropped most of the time, he is a capable batsman. His century in India evoked memories of his maiden hundred in Nagpur back in 2006. But he really came to the party in the Caribbean, scoring two tons and falling agonisingly short of a third, trying to up the pace in Barbados. His one day exploits were crucial for the new captain Strauss. Perfect for keeping a lid on flamboyant scoring or for getting some important runs in a tight situation, Collingwood is England go-to guy in one day cricket and will be for a while yet.

Stuart Broad – For a while, Broad’s batting was threatening to overshadow his bowling. His performances with the ball in the Caribbean will have informed people that progress is being made. Broad wasn’t in the same verve as Harmison circa 2004 and at times he and the rest of the attack hardly looked like taking a wicket (those long spells in the field for England in Barbados and Trinidad spring to mind). But he did show promise; in Jamaica he took 5-95, his first five wicket haul. During England’s wicket hunt in Antigua, he bowled a superb spell to remove Ramnaresh Sarwan and Shivnarine Chanderpaul, ending their frustrating partnership. He has all the accuracy of a young Glenn McGrath and is developing a dangerous pace too. He is still a work in progress – but what a work he is.

Failures:

Ian Bell – From stylish fixture of the middle order to unused drinks carrier, all in one tour. Bell’s miserable winter has seen him lose his place from all formats of England’s side. Bell began in India at number three, hoping to secure the place vacated by Michael Vaughan. A desperately lean series was followed up by a poor performance in the first Test at Jamaica and with the selectors looking for a sacrificial lamb, Bell was replaced by Owais Shah. Cast aside for the time being, is Bell too gifted a player to be left out? It is frustrating watching him play for England. He looks technically superb and, when in the right frame of mind, can be a dominant, free scoring batsman. But he is light-years away from being consistent enough, especially for the coveted number three spot. His best hope for a recall would be in the middle order, where the bulk of his previous Test runs have come.

Ryan Sidebottom – Another player who has gone worryingly backwards in the last year. He ended last winter by taking a ridiculous number of wickets in New Zealand and becoming the leader of England’s blossoming attack. Frequent injuries have reduced him to a shadow of the bowler he was. Ailing, slow and unthreatening, Sidebottom’s performance in the Barbados Test match left plenty to be desired. He looked slow in the field and was frequently barracked by his team-mates for misjudgements. When bowling, his pace was down and he was generally off colour. His status as the teams most dangerous swing bowler has now gone to James Anderson, who is a great deal quicker too. One feels for him as the amount of injuries he has suffered has surely had a harsh effect but England cannot put up with his level of performance for much longer, especially with the Aussies rolling in soon.

Monty Panesar – From a claim to be the world’s best finger spinner to England’s number two – Panesar has gone through quite a turnaround in his international career. Dropped for the Antigua Test and replaced by Graeme Swann, Panesar had clearly exhausted the patience of the England selectors. His deficiencies are well documented; poor batting, awful fielding, lack of variation when bowling, etc. In short, Panesar had become an unthreatening spinner. His lack of success on a fifth day pitch in India was extremely exasperating, especially so given the success had by fellow spinner Swann, a Test match novice. Panesar was back quickly, though, as England opted for two twirlers at Trinidad. And, thankfully, he showed some imagination, bowling with a great deal of thought and variation. The jury is out for the Ashes, however. Swann is a fine spinner and at least offers something with the bat. Panesar will need a huge amount of selectorial faith and some early season accomplishment if he is to be trusted by England again.

Honourable mentions must go to Graeme Swann, who excelled after making his Test debut and had already bagged two five-fors after just a handful of games, and Andrew Flintoff, who played a fine, supporting innings to Kevin Pietersen in Mohali and really thrilled with the ball at times in the Caribbean, ending things with that hat trick. Dishonourable mentions? Steve Harmison didn’t really excel like we prayed he would in the West Indies and looks to be well short on pace and, crucially, confidence. Owais Shah finally had his long awaited chance handed to him and he promptly decided to keep everyone guessing with some inept performances. Whether his ‘extended run’ in the side will last depends purely on the early season form of Ian Bell and Michael Vaughan.

Bouncebackability

Posted last year, mid-February — by Mark Tilley

It was football manager Iain Dowie who first coined this term, way back when his Crystal Palace side were struggling in the English Premier League. The phrase refers to a teams ability to bounce back from a defeat or any kind of adversity. Well, this England cricket side have suffered said adversity and then some. How do they respond to the humiliation of last week’s 51 all out?

The expected change has come. Owais Shah replaces Ian Bell at number three in the order and Steve Harmison has also been left out, in favour of James Anderson. Will it make the difference that England need? Shah’s inclusion has been long championed by England fans and pundits alike. It is perhaps a tad harsh on Harmison who didn’t bowl terribly badly in Jamaica but perhaps the feeling was that a change was needed.

The outfield is a concern in Antigua. Heavy rainfall has left area’s of the ground covered in sand and the bowlers run up, in particular, is an point of worry. However, England shouldn’t use the conditions as an excuse. They have a lot of making up to do and they had better start it soon. Alistair Cook could do with a big score to settle the doubters about him and if Kevin Pietersen should find himself in the late 90′s again, surely he will be looking for singles this time.

All in all, it looks like a fascinating Test. A nerve-wracking one too, if you’re an England follower.

Who should England drop? You decide

Posted last year, mid-February — by Will

Given England’s current debacle, it’s high-time we all did what England fans love to do: pretend we’re the selectors. It’s all very well everyone moaning about how dire the situation is when we all know how gleeful we really are. Britons can’t cope with success; we do, however, do a great line in depression and cynicism. This is our time. Stand tall, England fans, and show the world how we thrive in this meadow of misery.

I’ve chosen Cook, Bell, Harmison and Collingwood as the four candidates in the firing line, and you can choose a maximum of two to be dropped. So, vote in the poll and leave a comment with your reasoning.

Ian Bell throws it away again

Posted last year, mid-February — by Will

More excellence from Alan Tyers:

“Owais is really pushing hard for a go on this delicious cold chicken,” says Straussy with his mouth full.

“But unfortunately we’ve eaten it all,” says Collingwood. “It looked like I weren’t going to get a piece but I’ve just snucked in at the last moment and grabbed my chance with both hands. It weren’t pretty, but it were necessary.”

“He’s very much the man in possession,” shouts Cook. “Of the chicken! Straussy! Straussy! I done a bonding!”

Cook runs off to write it down in his Big Book Of Leadership Credentials. As he passes me in the doorway, he tries to poke me in the eye again. He misjudges it.

“Is there anything left?” I say.

“Absolutely,” says Straussy. “You’re very much part of this hamper, Owais old boy. Look, there’s a pickled beetroot left and a packet of Wine Gums.”

“Sorry,” says Flintoff. “I’ve had them.”

KP ton. Bell non-ton. Shah nearly ton

Posted last year, at the end of January — by Will

Kevin Pietersen, a man scorned, raced to a blistering hundred today. I say it was blistering purely on statistical evidence, and because all “quickfire” hundreds are either described as blistering, brisk, slick, breathtaking, “fine”, superb, brilliant, chancy, chanceless or sublime. For those who care, sublime is generally reserved for innings made a) at a quick rate and b) by someone naturally elegant. Most of Michael Vaughan’s hundreds before he was made captain were sublime, even when they were probably not.

But I digress. The scorecard for England’s first warm-up, against an Invitational XI, makes for interesting reading, and here’s why:

  • Andrew Strauss makes nought. Well, he is the new England captain after all.
  • Ian Bell does his best impression of Ian Bell by scoring 36 from 62, an innings neither aggressive or subdued. If innings were animals, this would be a goat with hearing difficulties lost on a moor.
  • Kevin Pietersen does his best impression of Kevin Pietersen pre-captaincy. Normal order has resumed.
  • Owais Shah, who will replace Bell eventually, creams 80 from 85 (with just one four, curiously).

After the debacle of the past few weeks, at last we can return to analysing and ridiculing England’s cricket and selections.

No Vaughan, but another new keeper

Posted 2 years ago, at the end of December — by Will

It wasn’t expected that Michael Vaughan would return, but there was almost a feeling of hope that the selectors would relent and call him back for the West Indies. Possibly at the expense of the constantly-underperforming Ian Bell.

It wasn’t to be. The Mumbai attacks prevented Vaughan from having any match practice with England’s performance squad and, as such, it now seems increasingly unlikely that he’ll be able to force his way back into the side for the Ashes. The pressure, then, is firmly back on Bell to actually score some ugly runs when the team most needs it. When the backs aren’t so much against the wall, as holding up the ceiling entirely. All these pretty little 40s are kidding no-one.

So, no Vaughan. But at least we have a new wicketkeeper – another one! – in Steven Davies who will be Matt Prior’s backup for the one-dayers. Tim Ambrose is Prior’s wingman for the Tests so, in all, England have three keepers available for one tour. It’s a trifle over the top.

Then again, given the state of West Indies cricket (Gayle and Chanderpaul aside), England ought not to break sweat.

Ian Belly’s diary

Posted 2 years ago, at the end of December — by Will

More insights from Ian in his diary:

From now on Official Team Video Technical Advisor Mike Garaway just watches the England batsman and every time the batsmen does something positive then Official Team Video Technical Advisor Mike Garaway presses a big red button on the front of the laptop marked ‘Positives’.

This saves a lot of time and effort and that way, at the end of the day Mooresy knows exactly how many positives we can be taking from the day at the end of the day, which at the end of the day is what it’s all about.

Apparently my innings today had no fewer than several positives to be drawn in that I’ve gone out there in a difficult situation, almost a no-win situation if you like and, although we haven’t won, I had everything to lose and in fact we didn’t lose.

We drewed.

Strauss relies on deep-rooted belief. Bell doesn’t

Posted 2 years ago, mid-December — by Will

When I woke up this morning at about 8 o’clock, England had just lost Kevin Pietersen and were three-down for not many. Were it not for needing to leg it to the estate agent to sign my contract, not to mention heading into the office for work, I’d have swallowed the cynaide there and then. England’s good position looked to be slipping away faster than the dying subcontinental sun.

What a turnaround; what guts, determination and skill Andrew Strauss and Paul Collingwood showed. It’s at times like these that we struggle to comprehend the importance of England’s position here: it is fast becoming a match-winning one and, if they win, it will count among the very best on Indian soil. If that’s putting too high a  price on an England victory, then to call it one of the most unlikely is an understatement. The terrorist strikes; the will-they-won’t-they return; the fact it’s in India, against an Indian team who have just beaten Australia. Kevin Pietersen may not be sleeping too well at the moment, but MS Dhoni will be reaching for hot milk and nytol this evening.

Strauss has been immense in this Test. He is not the player of old, but that’s inevitable. Firstly he doesn’t have Marcus Trescothick at the other end to spur him on, and secondly he has suffered a fairly rubbish couple of years. He seems to have gone back in time, perhaps even to before he was at Middlesex. Dogged defence has replaced urgent strokeplay but, crucially, he’s still ticking along at a good rate. His innings in this Test have been of a true opener, and we’ve not had cause to say that about him for some time. He was too loose, too often.

Loose is one of many words that could be used to describe Ian Bell. How long will England persist? It seems inconceivable that Owais Shah won’t be considered in the next Test; a shock and a wake-up call is what Bell urgently needs. I’ve lost count of the number of times he gets off the mark with world cricket’s most sumptious and technically perfect cover drive (or on-drive), but he seems allergic to score ugly runs. It’s all about positivity and urgent run-making; appearing to make a statement; rolling up his sleeves, having a word with the fielders. This is not Ian Bell.

Bell was my first interviewee in 2005 and he came across as a really shy, quiet sort of bloke who was intimidated by the bravado Kevin Pietersen – who was the brash newcomer at the time – brought to the side. Shortly after that series he gave an interview in which he spoke about his “presence”, something Alec Stewart had been helping him with. So his theory went, he felt he needed to assert himself more – whether that meant skipping down the pitch for a lofted four to a spinner, or skipping down the pavilion steps and showing a “positive” way of reaching the crease when he first came in.

This is all clearly a facade of paper-thin proportions and it’s not kidding anyone, least of all Bell himself. Like Strauss, he should just be himself and rely on his ridiculously rare batting gifts to see him through.