ringtone that trick whoopringtone streamlinecranberry linger ringtone

Quotehanger

  • "Find something else to do, lad. You'll never be good enough at cricket."
    What Ryan Sidebottom was told by an unnamed coach when he was 14

  • Help the blog...

    Recent Posts

    The headlines


    giles clarke

    City, county, region

    By Will Tuesday, last week, 7 Comments »

    So Giles Clarke, the ECB chairman, doesn’t believe a city-based franchise system would be workable in England’s attempt to challenge the Indian Premier League. In fact, Clarke said that “franchise sport has simply never worked in the UK”, which comes hot on the heels of county chief executives voicing their own concerns over the latest Twenty20 developments.

    Clarke was speaking at the ECB’s AGM, but some of what he says concerns me. He was full of praise for India’s tournament, but insisted “much of the look and feel of the tournament was taken from the ECB template”. Valid sentiments, but it only makes the ECB look even more daft, short-sighted and bitter that they didn’t think of it first. There is still no clear idea of what the English Premier League will amount to, and the relevant parties - ECB, Professional Cricketers’ Association and the counties themselves - all appear to be at loggerheads with one another. Meanwhile, Allen Stanford is waiting in the wings, licking his lips at what he believes could be a huge earner. But how? And when?

    We can forget 18 counties being involved. That much we know. And I’m not in favour of city-based franchises either as this will inevitably lead to some cities and towns being left out, or merged with a neighbour. For example, thinking purely geographically, Gloucestershire and Glamorgan would presumably be combined…but as what? Bristol or Cardiff? Exclude one and you’re effectively ruling out 50% of the England and Wales Cricket Board.

    Regionalisation seems a fair and simple solution:

    North Yorkshire, Lancashire, Durham
    London Surrey, Middlesex, Essex
    South Hampshire, Kent, Sussex
    Wales and West Glamorgan, Gloucestershire, Somerset
    West Midlands Warwickshire, Worcestershire, Northants
    East Midlands Nottinghamshire, Leicestershire, Derbyshire

    Fascinating to think of the teams these would put on the park, too, and who would captain them. Your thoughts?

    7 Comments »

    ‘Mollycoddled’ players can’t think for themselves

    By Will last year, at the start of November, 2 Comments »

    Laptops have become a mainstay of the coach’s armoury
    © Cricinfo Ltd

    There was a piece in the New Zealand press which I Surfered yesterday in which Nathan Astle revealed the “brain washing” he and his team-mates have been experiencing, or whatever the term is.

    This is the much-trumpeted forum that as told in Nathan Astle’s just released autobiography includes a session in which each player has to leave the room while the rest of side break into groups and dream up adjectives to best describe him, and a few things they believe he should try to brush up on.Apparently the brainchild of a former Australian school teacher, the supposed aim is to improve the relationship-dynamics between the players, therefore imbuing the squad with a greater sense of trust and, as a consequence, helping to achieve more success on the playing field. That’s the aim, anyway.

    And today John Morrison, the former New Zealand batsman, has joined in the debate - even arguing that in terms of “over analysis,” the New Zealand cricket team is heading in the same direction as the All Blacks. He raises some important points:

    “I’m always worried when I go to a ground and see cricket coaches poring over laptops but the problem is, now if you say anything to the contrary you’re called old and out of touch.

    So instead we’ve created this industry of extras around the team who have to justify their existence by taking any decisions or responsibilities away from the players.

    “So we’ve got this mollycoddled generation of sportsmen who might be great athletes but who have lost all ability to think for themselves.

    All this (for me, anyway) ties nicely into Giles Clarke’s comments the other day, in which he said “cricket is a business”. And it is. Cricket (and many other top-level sports) is no longer about the players, or even the sport itself. The game has become an incidental extra to the serious business of making money. Now, Morrison’s comments aren’t directly linked to this - but the constant over-use of technology, inspection and analysis isn’t helping anyone, and is another needless obsession away from the actual game itself. As he says, these players are all supreme athletes, but what do they have to show for it?

    And what is the solution?

    2 Comments »