| 
Posts and words
Loading ...
Adam Gilchrist’s 2009 Cowdrey Lecture
By Will Wednesday, last week, 2 Comments »
An eloquent, thoughtful and insightful speech made by Adam Gilchrist today. He supported the rise of Twenty20 but defended Test cricket, urging administrators to leave it alone as much as possible. He also pushed for cricket to be included in the Olympics, which isn’t something I know or care much about, but I can see the good it would do for the publicity of cricket.
The post-speech question-and-answer session was excellent, featuring Gilchrist, Graeme Swann and Dave Richardson, the former South Africa wicketkeeper now working for the ICC, and a good man he is too. Shared a couple of beers with him in South Africa and he’s a very serious student of the game, with its core values at the heart of everything he does. When asked this evening his predictions for the Ashes, he quipped: “It’ll be 2-1 going into The Oval, with England in front, and the chairman of the ECB, Giles Clarke, will prepare a featherbed for the final Test” which was a bit of a surprise, and not one Clarke will too overly pleased with I bet.
I put up the transcript of the speech at Cricinfo, so do give it a close read, and MCC will have an MP3 of the recording later.
2 Comments »He’s not the Messiah…….
By Richard Seeckts 4 months ago, 17 Comments »
Please, please, please let us be spared a chorus of ‘Prior is the new Gilchrist’ over the coming days and weeks.
He isn’t. Adam Gilchrist was a once in a lifetime player and it will do Prior no favours to mention the pair in the same breath.
Almost unbelievably, the suggestion first appeared in print after Prior’s century on debut at Lord’s in May 2007. The West Indian bowling in that match was little better than the club class pies tossed his way today, and the pitch equally as easy as that in Trinidad.
Prior can bat, and hasn’t dropped any howlers recently, but let’s reserve judgement on his class until he has played several series against Australia and South Africa. He may evolve into the new Alec Stewart in time, which would be laudable enough. But Gilchrist, never.
Remember, England spent twenty years dubbing the likes of David Capel, Derek Pringle, Phil De Freitas and Chris Lewis as the new Botham before finally realising that there will never be one.
17 Comments »My top Ashes ten
By Will last year, at the end of October, 2 Comments »
I offered my top ten Ashes heroes for Patrick Kidd’s excellent series, which you can find below. It’s by far from definitive: basically my favourites, the ones I’ve most enjoyed in action or having read about. Nevertheless: cuss me in the comments if you wish.
Our guest blogger this week, to go with the continuing series on Ashes Heroes, is Will Luke, bright young thing of the Cricinfo stable, tabloid fodder and something of a grandfather in the blogging world as he began his Corridor blog way back in 2004, rather than surfing the post-Ashes euphoria like the rest of us. Here’s who he has picked as his ten Ashes heroes:
Richie Benaud The consummate allrounder on the pitch (a fine Ashes captain in the 50s too) and the voice for a generation (or two) in the commentary box. His MCC Masterclass (circa early 1990s) on leg spin is a hidden gem for young, aspiring leggies.
Douglas Jardine A rare Englishman whose name makes Australians flinch. And he didn’t care if they were made to flinch by his tactics, either.
Steve Waugh Embittered, determined, mostly ugly but wonderfully free-flowing if needed. Never, ever defeated and nearly always rose to the biggest of occasions time and again. Unflinchingly stubborn and the first Australian I begrudgingly had to admit to myself that, yes, he was probably a hero.
Shane Warne If perhaps not the single biggest factor in Australia’s Ashes dominance in the 1990s, then certainly the most entertaining cricketer and character in a generation. Love rat extrordinaire.
Dennis Lillee A menacing, angry figure. Unbelievably skilful. The Ashes footage I watched (sadly on video) of him bowl will always stick in my mind.
Darren Gough The heart of ten lions and gave hope that anything was possible when clearly it wasn’t. You’d want him in a war trench just for his optimism.
Ian Botham Everything was possible. 1981, yadda yadda.
Andrew Flintoff Everything is possible. I don’t think any Englishman had struck an Australian for bigger sixes than those sky-scraping missiles he whacked in 2005. His over to Ponting was gold-dust.
Glenn McGrath He always seemed to gain a yard in pace against England. That was my/our feeble excuse. Bastardly metronomic yet a wonderfully unhinged interviewee. In fact, he was just wonderfully unhinged.
Adam Gilchrist It wasn’t enough that Australia had McGrath, Warne and the Waughs. No. They had to produce this dynamo of uninhibited savagery and, worst of all, he was unfailingly honest and polite to boot. An all-round git of an entertainer who created the new breed of batsman-wicketkeeper.
“Do I have $1.5m for Mr Dhoni?”
By Will last year, at the end of February, 13 Comments »
The IPL cattle market is, for now, over and the players have been sold, branded and sent to their respective clubs. One of our chaps in India did a brilliant job of live blogging the whole thing (I think most media outlets stole/borrowed the details), and it was fascinating seeing which players went to which clubs and for what sum. Albie Morkel went for $675,000; Adam Gilchrist for $700,000. Chris Gayle cost $800,000 while Kolkata bid $950,000 for Ishant Sharma.
The hype of the IPL is almost overflowing at the moment, but I still can’t see the tournament lasting the long haul. Super-powered teams have been forced together in the past - World XIs and so on - without great success, so why will the IPL be any different? It’s a quick injection of easy money for the players and a bit of fun for us, but don’t expect it to last. He says, desperately hoping he is right…
What do you make of it all?
13 Comments »A great batsman, an average keeper
By Jonathan Liew last year, at the end of January, 12 Comments »
It’s quite telling that amongst all the plaudits for the departing Adam Gilchrist (caught age, bowled disinterest 36), virtually everybody seems to be paying tribute to his electrifying batting, rather than his keeping. There’s a good reason for this. Gilchrist was capable of some astonishing innings - for which he’ll almost exclusively be remembered, as here - but compares most unfavourably when compared to the likes of Tallon, Grout, Marsh, Oldfield and Healy behind the stumps. Six of Gilly’s greatest wicket-keeping performances, anyone? No?
He was a superb, match-winning batsman, who would probably have earned his place in the side on batting alone - but equally, it’s a sign of the times that even the Greatest Keeper Of The Modern Age wasn’t actually that good a keeper.
Still glad to see the back of him, obviously…
12 Comments »Post your Adam Gilchrist videos
By Will last year, at the end of January, No Comments; be the first!
Go forth and find videos. Post your favourites from Youtube and co and leave them in the comments. Here’s a belter: his 162 against New Zealand in 2005.
No Comments »Gilly retires
By Will last year, at the end of January, 23 Comments »
I’ve been out of the loop the past few days, spending time at the horrific hospital in Plymouth. In fact, it wasn’t horrific - but neither was it the best place in which to spend a few days away from London.
Nee mind. Back in cricket world, and I’ve literally only just read about it a few moments ago, Adam Gilchrist has retired which took me (and presumably most others) completely by surprise. A monumental career, and the last - follow Glenn McGrath and Shane Warne - of a trio that have lifted Australia’s fortunes into the stratosphere in the past decade.
My hatred of him began early when I watched his sickening 152 at Edgbaston in the 2001 Ashes. On 99, Caddick tried to bounce him. Gilchrist stepped to leg slightly, lifted his bat ramrod straight in the air, like a periscope, and spooned the ball over the wicketkeeper for four to bring him his hundred. But my disgust that Australia should have found such a world-beater didn’t fully take off until I hear him roar “yeeeeah!” while going to his hundred.
It spoke volumes of the near-arrogance with which Australia played their cricket; the confidence, allied with supreme natural ability, which littered their XI in the 1990s and early 2000s. Gilchrist was outrageous, skilful and a total bastard.
I say bastard in the most complimentary manner, but was he really? Unlike McGrath and even Warne, I warmed to Gilchrist quite quickly. Of all the Australians in that side, he more than most seemed to have a conscience and, annoyingly, played the game in the right spirit. How could someone who batted in such a carefree, ebullient, manic manner also be a “walker”? The two concepts - confidence and honesty - weren’t, to the observer, compatible yet Gilchrist made it so. I suppose to aspiring Australians, he must have been nothing short of a hero, and even to opposing fans he remained unmissable entertainment. Perhaps that is the yardstick by which we should judge him: he was pure entertainment.
What were your favourite Gilchrist moments? And does his retirement leave Australia in a pickle?
23 Comments »‘Jam this big bastard’
By Will 2 years ago, mid-December, 3 Comments »
Great piece from Peter English on Andrew Symonds and Adam Gilchrist’s use of the mic:
3 Comments »The same players who were frightened by the thought of allowing some of their language to be broadcast in Tests, particularly in South Africa and Bangladesh, where the effects microphones are usually more sensitive to fielding chatter, allowed an insight into their real lives. To see the men, who commentated a couple of overs without much intervention from their former team-mates in the Nine box, operate so candidly in a game they were treating fairly seriously was a shock. They displayed their personalities with thoughtful and revealing remarks alongside jokey-blokey jibes in a way that most athletes don’t - or won’t - during the short times granted for cliché-filled press conferences.
Harmison the iPod
By Will 2 years ago, at the start of December, 6 Comments »
Great line from KingCricket on Steve Harmison:
We see and agree with the reasons for omitting Steve Harmison, but it does underline why we like him. You can’t pick a guy whose bowling line is set to ’shuffle’, but he’s resolutely not an English seam bowler. He’s 12 feet tall and he bowls quickly. It’s not that he’s capable of bowling quickly, it’s that he just does it. It’s his natural speed. In Sri Lankan conditions the ‘effort ball’ is pretty much an impossibility. Effortless speed is the only option.
Talking of nothing at all, I was pondering some songs which might accompany cricketers to and from the crease (Twenty20 style) the other day. I didn’t very far - The Police with So Lonely for the trudge back to the pavilion was an early idea though. What might England’s team have on their iPods, I wonder?
Update: AC/DC’s Shake Your Foundation for Adam Gilchrist. And possibly the theme tune to The Archers for Kevin Pietersen, in a “I’m more English than thou” sort of statement.
Gilchrist hits 100th six
By Will 2 years ago, mid-November, 3 Comments »
He’s whacked his 100th Test six, becoming the first man to do so. It sailed into the crowd, and he’s made a plea to the guy who nicked it that he can have it back as a memento - as well he should, too.
137.5 Muralitharan to Gilchrist, SIX, And there you go. SIX No.100, take a bow Adam Gilchrist, another slog sweep and he clears the stadium, the Bellerive is too small for him, no batsman has hit 100 sixes in Tests, we have the king now. It’s over midwicket and on it’s way to Perth there
3 Comments »The secret of Australian success
By Scott 2 years ago, at the start of September, 9 Comments »
Robert “Crash” Craddock writes about Shane Warne’s list, and about Warne’s animosity towards Steve Waugh and Adam Gilchrist.
But underneath it all there is a fascinating, essentially untold story about how two superstars of the modern game somehow managed to survive and thrive year after year in the same side despite a fallout which left each man cold.
Waugh will never expand on the details because he could not be bothered starting a bushfire from which no one could win.
Warne’s definition of Gilchrist as “still a batsman-keeper rather than the other way around” is not flattering (even given Gilchrist’s freakish batting skills) and one which Gilchrist would not enjoy.
You can call Gilchrist a madhouse slogger and he will laugh along with you but dismissiveness of his keeping skills hurts him because he sees himself as a keeper first.
…..In a perverse sort of way, Warne’s modest rating of Steve Waugh and Gilchrist gives us a hint of why Australian teams have been so successful over the past decade – they simply put the personal stuff to one side and go out and play for the team.
It sounds easy to do but it has been beyond many fragmented England, West Indian, Indian and Pakistan teams of the same era.
Warne and Waugh might not have been each other’s cup of tea but you would never have known it on the field.
The ability of Australia’s players to put their personal stuff to one side and play for the team is undoubtedly a big part of Australia’s success. I don’t know, but I suspect that New Zealand are also good at doing this, which is why they are able to punch above their weight in international cricket.
9 Comments »The Indians who can do it all
By Will 2 years ago, at the end of August, 1 Comment »
Being a cricket journalist while on holiday in India has its advantages, no doubt. Most people I encounter are keen to know my job (and even more importantly which company employs me), and quite a few know of Cricinfo and are desperate, it seems, to prove their cricketing worth. One young chap today (whose friendly nature threatened to descend into irritating begging) is surely the future of Indian cricket, if not the world.
He bowls leg-spin better than Shane Warne and models his off-spinner’s doosra on Murali; he opens the bowling at the speed of light, not unlike Darren Gough apparently; he keeps wicket with the feline-feet of Alan Knott (!) and bats like Marcus Trescothick, Michael Warne (it’s the accent, but I couldn’t help chuckling) and Adam Gilchrist. A killer player, then, if fantastical.
Watch out for him. He, and the identical dozen other youngsters who I’ve come across, will be dominating the world shortly…
Use the force, Luke
By Ian 2 years ago, at the start of August, 1 Comment »
I was a little sceptical about Luke Wright’s succession to the England 20-20 squad on the basis that he scored the most runs in this year’s campaign, not least because Chris Schofield was picked for taking the most wickets. Graeme Swann must be uber-gutted! But while I am delighted the selectors have decided to go with a specialist squad, I had developed the opinion that Wright was just a slogger-got-lucky.
Not for the first time, I was dead wrong. His 60-ball hundred last night for Sussex against Gloucestershire was stunning. While there was the odd smear and hoik, almost every shot was orthodox, including a dreamy cover drive and on drive, all hit with terrible power and timing. Gloucestershire are not the very worst of attacks – I’m sure Wright will meet some worse bowlers at the 20-20 World Cup – but he made them look inept. Even Michael Atherton was purring by the end, shifting his stance from, “if you’re good enough for international 50 over cricket, you’re good enough for 20-20†to “if this lad’s good enough for 20-20, he should be good enough for 50 overs too.â€
There were various comparisons, such as he grips and rips like Tendulkar or has the speed of hands through the ball as Ali Brown. Indeed, not since Brown have I seen an Englishman so dismantle an attack in the way Jayasuriya or Gilchrist do for fun. As a right-hander, he had something of Michael Slater about him, although I’ll go for a more modern Aussie as a comparison, who likewise has plenty more to prove. Shane Watson batted in a very similar fashion in the World Cup, matching power and timing with elegance. He bowls a bit too and has the same bottle blond hair. Time will tell whether Luke Wright can mix it on the same stage.
1 Comment »Thanks for coming
By Ian 2 years ago, at the end of April, 18 Comments »
Gadzooks - yet another one sided match. And in a tourney of one sided matches, this was about the most imbalanced. “They’ll choke,” said the Aussies on the boat this morning after a choppy overnight crossing from Musquite, and choke they did. All the confidence the Boks showed in Barbados against the English had evaporated. What they could have given for the captain’s performance that Jayawardene provided yesterday!
And so on to Barbados for the final. All we want is a proper game of cricket. Can the plucky Sri Lankans test the Aussies? So far they have lost no more than six wickets and they’ve bowled out every opposition - it would be harsh if they are not recoronated world champions. But all the more delicious for all that! That said, it would be wonderful to see Adam Gilchrist score some runs in the final. So far he was scored two runs in the two innings I’ve seen.
Before we get stuck into a few sundowners on St Lucia, here’s a team we’ve put together entitled ‘Thanks for coming’. It’s a team that at the start of the tournament could have been the stars, but they have flattered to deceive. No doubt, we have missed out the odd loser or two.
1. Michael Vaughan 2. Chris Gayle 3. Sachin Tendulkar 4. Ross Taylor 5. Inzi 6. Michael Hussey 7. MS Dhoni 8. Shaun Pollock 9. Shahid Afridi 10. Saj Mahmood 11. Makhaya Ntini
Ian Valentine is a freelance journalist blogging the World Cup for The Corridor
18 Comments »It is too late for a firesale
By Scott 2 years ago, at the start of April, 7 Comments »
Adam Gilchrist has called for cut priced tickets to help fill the stadiums and create some atmosphere in the remaining fixtures.
“You come to the Caribbean to experience that unique atmosphere that is Caribbean cricket,” Gilchrist told AFP. “There certainly is an element of the sterile feel about it. I don’t know whether that’s because administration hasn’t let it flow or whether people just aren’t turning up. It’s a little bit frustrating.â€
Restrictions on what items can be taken into the stadiums, ticket prices and the poor form of West Indies – not to mention India and Pakistan’s exits – have not helped the situation. “Whatever the [pricing] policy is at the moment, it doesn’t seem to be working,†Gilchrist said.
“So maybe we can look at dropping the price and have a sale. I know retailers with over-stocked merchandise certainly have a sale every year … maybe that’s something we can look at.â€
A nice idea but I fear it is too late now for that sort of thing. The West Indies cricket public are knowledgeable and they know a red-herring when they see one. In many ways, the 2007 World Cup has already flopped.
There has been some good to come out of this tournament; the rise of Bangladesh, the splendid surprise of Ireland, and the excellence of Sri Lanka and Australia. But as Jack Warner put it, it has not been a World Cup of the people. And that has doomed it from the start. And the next tournament is in India and Pakistan. What chance that is going to be any better?
7 Comments » « Previous Entries