Comments on: ‘Gentlemanly’ conduct? http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2009/11/23/gentlemanly-conduct/ Peering down the corridor of uncertainty. It's about cricket, sport and journalism Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:40:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Rich Abbott http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2009/11/23/gentlemanly-conduct/comment-page-1/#comment-196384 Rich Abbott Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:30:33 +0000 http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/?p=4523#comment-196384 I wondered that too - speaks volumes for the fitness of the batsmen. Assume it applied to the close fielders, and that a certain amount of tussle ensued once the ball was safely pouched. I think that confusion reigned, even then, hence the rule being brought in. Still think the ICC should consider it... I wondered that too – speaks volumes for the fitness of the batsmen. Assume it applied to the close fielders, and that a certain amount of tussle ensued once the ball was safely pouched. I think that confusion reigned, even then, hence the rule being brought in.

Still think the ICC should consider it…

]]> By: Howzat.com http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2009/11/23/gentlemanly-conduct/comment-page-1/#comment-196349 Howzat.com Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:04:01 +0000 http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/?p=4523#comment-196349 Hilarious. I'd pay to watch Andrew Symonds tearing after Harbhajan Singh or Sreesanth. Or Monty running behind a poor little sod at short cover (Talk about irony anyone?) I'm curious though, how did the batsmen have the time to run after the fielder after the ball was hit? Hilarious. I’d pay to watch Andrew Symonds tearing after Harbhajan Singh or Sreesanth.

Or Monty running behind a poor little sod at short cover (Talk about irony anyone?)

I’m curious though, how did the batsmen have the time to run after the fielder after the ball was hit?

]]>