Love sport? Try betting on your favourite team and win!

 


Twitter

 

Recent Posts

Cricket news



Fantasy Cricket

Lord’s: for men of substance

By Will last year, at the start of May Add your comment below

I’m not one for looking too deeply into the meaning of sporting venues on the human psyche, but I did enjoy reading Suresh Menon’s Print Run on the books that have been written about Lord’s. In particular, this:

“Chief among the charming characteristics of Lord’s is its dignity. To sit at Lord’s is to share in substance and so become a man of substance yourself.” JM Kilburn

Dignity is exactly right. I tried to explain Lord’s to a South African the other week, and the closest analogy I could come up with was the feeling that you’re watching it in a living room surrounded by a few thousand fans, many of whom aren’t there for the cricket but are there to be there. That it’s a social occasion ought, by default, to dilute the atmosphere but it doesn’t: it encourages a sleepy, soporific interest in the game.

Lord’s is like a grand piano in the corner of the room. It looks good with or without a player.

Tags: |

8 Responses to “Lord’s: for men of substance”

  • Reverse Swing wrote:
    May 4th, 2009 at 11.37 am

    I find Lords best on non-international match days. Domestic one day finals are probably best. The atmosphere is still there (heck, it’s probably still there on a wet winters day in February) but you haven’t got the stifling upper class elitism that seems to deaden the atmosphere that you get when England play. The ’soporific’ you refer to that almost turns it into a neutral venue.

    It’ll be interesting to see what happens at the 20/20 World Cup.

  • vinay verma wrote:
    May 4th, 2009 at 11.45 am

    Lord’s,SCG,MCG,Eden Gardens,Adelaide Oval are all “temples”/ “churches” for the religion we call cricket. The millions that participate in it and never have the oppurtunity to visit the temple do so with as much,if not more,dignity than the many who go to the temple to appear virtuous . The celebration of the game in Afghanistan or Nepal is as noble and dignified as the greats who have given us so much pleasure. Religion is meaningless unless it is practiced as it was intended.

    Dignity comes from service to the game. Without any thought of the rewards. And there are a few administrators who would do well to remember this. The vast majority play the game for the sheer love and enjoymnet. It is only a few that actually get paid to play and more power to them for the enjoyment they give us.

    Administrators need to be more prudent when accepting revenue from Broadcasters and sponsors. Stanford stands exposed and the judgement is still out on the IPL. The aura of dignity around Lords is somewhat lessened.

    The BCCI’s complicity with the corporates will ultimately compromise their charter. Custodianship demands good and transparent governance.

    Cricket will survive this temporal loss of dignity and continues to be meaningful even in this twitter twitter world.

  • richo wrote:
    May 6th, 2009 at 12.50 pm

    Well said Vinay…

  • vinay verma wrote:
    May 7th, 2009 at 10.25 am

    Ravi Bopara has emerged as a man of substance.Duleepsinhji made a royal 173 in 1930 against Australia and when he was dismissed his uncle Ranjitsinhji remarked”That boy always played one shot too many” George Hedley the BB(he preferred brown bomber to black Bradman)hit 106 and 107 in 1939. Only Clyde Walcott of the famous “W’s” hit a century at Lords.Bradman’s 254 in 1930 was in the same Test as Duleepsinhji.Clive LLoyd and Kapil Dev have lifted World Cups at Lords. Garfield Sobers 163 Not out in 1966 and Rohan Kanhai’s 147 in 1973 were stand outs. In 1965 John Edrich was felled by a Peter Pollock bouncer but continued on. Jack Hobbs highest score was 316 for Surrey against Middlesex in 1926.
    Sir Len Hutton played probably his most expansive innings in 1953 against Australia scoring 145 at Lords The bowling he faced was Lindwall,Miller,Johnson,Benaud and Davidson and hit 16 fours.
    And one of the most substantial men was Mike Gatting.

  • 12th man wrote:
    May 12th, 2009 at 6.56 am

    I agree – i spent one afternoon at Lords; it was sublime. I hope to go there for an English summer season soon. I’ll be writing about that and my experience at Lords at http://www.thecricketnation.com

  • Sunny Singh wrote:
    May 14th, 2009 at 4.23 am

    “Lord’s is like a grand piano in the corner of the room. It looks good with or without a player.”
    It’s a good-looking ground allright but I can’t control my laughter at the oohs & aahs followed by the pitter-patter sound of the ‘huge’ applause.
    Also,to call Lords a Gurdwara/Temple/Church seems quite ridiculous considering in all these religious places there isn’t discrimination on any grounds.
    Women-hating members didn’t allow any females of the human species in the ground for a very long time.
    Female pet squirrels were allowed though.
    Tolerance is one of the great features of Hinduism,but since I’m not Hindu,to tolerate stuff like “Oooh I say,thats a very fine shot”,”Good-Show Good-show” & the typical condescending attitude of those stuck-up judgemental snobs in the members section is almost impossible.

    The Oval,even with some of those snobs,for some reason makes you a lot more comfortable.Difference in the atmosphere inside the ground maybe?
    Anyways,congrats to England’s test match team for achieving-what is for them-the impossible.
    Beating the second worst test team in the world convincingly.

  • Sunny Singh wrote:
    May 14th, 2009 at 4.27 am

    Ohh & yeah, the picture of the 2 srilankan kids at the top-right corner of the blog is very old.
    A new picture/s there would do something for your blog.

  • vinay verma wrote:
    May 16th, 2009 at 10.16 pm

    Tolerance is. firstly, a feature of civilisation before any religion or class. There is a Hindu saying which roughly paraphrased says if you have nothing good to say it is better to keep quiet.

    Congratulations with a caveat sound hollow. The victors were humble in victory and the losers gracious in defeat. That,to me is the important consideration. Cricket when celebrated transcends the result.

    There is also more “comfort” in watching cricket than in watching “snobbish” spectators.

    The emergence of Bopara as a legitimate contender for the number three spot and the performance of Swann augur well for the Ashes. For the Windies it was a match they would rather forget.Here’s hoping the”second worst team” can improve.

  • Comments

     


    Receive email updates on new comments


    « | Main | »