| 
Posts and words
Loading ...England can’t keep blaming test series losses on “one poor session”. They did that in India 2008 (Sehwag going ballistic), they are saying that for their loss against WI 2009. It is a poor excuse, and it means that at their best, they may be as good as WI, but at their worst, they are far, far worse than WI. Strauss et al need to accept that, and get more hungry performers into the team, and soon!
Time to take stock and try again
By Mark Tilley last year, mid-March Add your comment below
A great deal has been mentioned already on the subject of England’s series defeat in the West Indies. It’s an odd thing; England didn’t necessarily play their worst cricket we’ve seen and, at times, dominated the West Indies. Indeed, Andrew Strauss can point to two key sessions where had his side picked up just a few tail-end wickets, then they would have won the series (the last wicket stand in Antigua and yesterday’s tense finish in Trinidad). However, what is patently obvious is that good Test teams would have made more of those opportunities. Dominant sides like South Africa, Australia and India would have found the extra spark in those moments to do what was needed and win the game.
Tom Fordyce picks upon this point in his BBC blog. He also talks about the need for winning momentum in the run up to the looming Ashes series. Before that heart-stopping triumph in 2005, England won series in both the Caribbean and South Africa, as well as a summer whitewash over the New Zealand and West Indies in 2004. England had the mentality and the aura of a winning side. Under the astute leadership of Michael Vaughan, they were fresh, confident and effective.
One can argue that the quality of players back then was greatly superior than that of the current crop. But the bare facts still make for stark reading; England have now lost three consecutive Test series and are in poor, poor form. And whilst a few weeks ago some were saying that England need not worry about their own tribulations as the Australians were in a sharp decline of their own, those of that opinion need only look at the remarkable and supremely impressive resurgence of the Aussies down in South Africa. As much as I loathe to say it, they’re back and they’re looking ridiculously formidable.
As ludicrous as it sounds, there were precious few positives that England can reflect on in the aftermath of their defeat. Andrew Strauss embodies a man possessed with the desire to score as many runs as possible and it is clear that the captaincy of the side is driving him on and on. Alastair Cook finally got the ‘no century in ages’ monkey off his back and scored that elusive Test hundred, albeit in a nothing situation on a pitch more akin to a road that a competitive wicket. Ravi Bopara, Matt Prior and Paul Collingwood also notched up much needed runs, in a variety of situations, which will help their own personal form and confidence.
Stuart Broad bowled like a identikit version on a young Glenn McGrath. Naggingly accurate and massively consistent, he bowled to an immaculate line, picked up the prized wicket of Guyanese defensive wall Shivnarine Chanderpaul three times and bagged his first Test five wicket haul in Jamaica. He may not have the raw pace of Steve Harmison or Andrew Flintoff but a reliable, line and length bowler is just what England need and his runs at number eight are ideal for the the inevitable England batting collapse. Duncan Fletcher must rue not having him around when he was coach.
Regardless of individual promise, it is abundantly clear that England have problems – problems that require immediate and urgent attention if they are to ever get out of this decline and start becoming an competent Test side again. Will that era be shepherded in with a glorious Ashes victory this summer? At the moment, you’d pick up seriously long odds.
Tags: alastair-cook, andrew-strauss, duncan-fletcher, england, england-in-west-indies, stuart-broad, west-indies |
4 Responses to “Time to take stock and try again”
March 11th, 2009 at 7.27 pm
March 11th, 2009 at 9.55 pm
The other huge positives were Anderson and Swann – plus Monty finally bowling an arm ball.
We’ve actually got the makings of a decent bowling attack assuming Flintoff is fit.
March 12th, 2009 at 6.52 am
Wow,the west indies have managed to win a test series.
Pleasantly surprising.
How does a country like england,with the best infrastructure in the world manage to slip down to number 6 in the test and the oneday rankings.
The poor little english cricketers must be getting slammed from all quarters right now.
But I anticipate something else.
May I humbly suggest to the english fans and their media to not blame this on the IPL.
The west indies team got a few contracts as well and we are all aware that an IPL contract,and the subsequent financial gains,must mean a lot more for a west indian cricketer than their corresponding english counterparts.
How is it that their performances weren’t affected????
I shall wait and watch.
March 13th, 2009 at 1.41 pm
Simply, England does not have the best infrastructure in the world. Our county game, despite the changes 10 years ago, is a long way removed from test cricket in terms of competitiveness (not just quality, but players’ attitudes).
The Aussies clearly took the defeat at home to SA as a personal slight, and set about taking their revenge, as we saw in the last Ashes series after they lost in 2005.
English players do not display the same hunger. We may well beat West Indies at home in a couple of months, and then all the talk will be of winning back the Ashes again. We simply never learn.
One or two series will not be enough to turn this around, it will more likely take a couple of years at least. It took Fletcher and Hussain/Vaughan nearly five before England were among the best.
Comments
