Comments on: Mitchell Johnson: Lehmann or Klusener?

By: Anton

Anton — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:25:10 +0000

Mitchell Johnson isn’t of slight build. He is a lean, muscular man. Lean muscles can give the appearance of slight build, but trust me, he isn’t sight in the mould of Upal Chandana, for example. Look at kevin Pietersen, he looks slight on the TV, but in flesh, he is a big guy, quite imposing.

By: raz

raz — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 05:46:42 +0000

mr. concrete feet will be sehwag

By: Marcus

Marcus — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:08:55 +0000

I don’t know the answer, but one thing I do know is that he’s well on the way to becmonig our best allrounder since Alan Davidson!

By: Hammy

Hammy — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:51:20 +0000

Lance Klusener was more intent on treating all bowlers with disdain and dispatching them to all part of the ground. Mitchell Johnson plays with a straight bat. The way Australia is going at the moment he should be batting at no. 3.

By: Will Davies

Will Davies — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:46:38 +0000

“But he has a great eye, and his concrete feet reminded me a little of Lance Klusener, slashing through extra cover, and also Darren Lehmann. And someone else, too, that I can’t think of…”
Marcus Trescothick?