Quotehanger

  • "I think their minds were already on the plane home. I am just not sure they were here to play today."
    Jamie Siddons on Bangladesh's performance in the last league match of the Asia Cup

    Jul 4, 2008

  • Recent Posts

    Try DVD rental for £3.99 per month!

    The headlines



    Flintoff out of first two Tests

    By Will 2 months ago Leave a comment on this post

    Well, so much for England’s selectorial headache. It’s been resolved for them, partially, with Andrew Flintoff picking up a side strain which rules him out of the first two Tests against New Zealand. Who to pick? Ravi Bopara? Luke Wright? And how long before Michael Vaughan’s knee collapses?

    It’s all jolly exciting, so have your say below.

    Tags: , , |

    8 Responses to “Flintoff out of first two Tests”

  • William wrote:
    May 10th, 2008 at 1.09 pm

    Thank heavens for that. I was getting worried they’d pick him. This means they’ll probably just pick him for the third test with even less County Cricket under his belt though..

  • porridge wrote:
    May 10th, 2008 at 3.13 pm

    I’ve changed my mind - it’s been so long since Fred’s had anything positive at international level going for him. Maybe we should forget about him, like Harmison, and head to the future with a new breed of bowlers. I think I might go for Sidebottom, Broad, Hoggard, Jimmy Anderson and the Montster (who hasn’t been performing quite well either). I’d have Strauss and maybe Vaughan opening, with Cook, Bell, KP and Tim Ambrose. Ravi Bopara and Luke Wright haven’t quite proven themselves at the Test level yet, and are still pretty young anyway.

  • india_fan wrote:
    May 10th, 2008 at 9.44 pm

    I’d still drop Strauss, I don’t think he’ll do well in the more important series against SA. I’d have Carberry and Cook opening with Hoggard taking the remaining bowling spot.

    I think England really need to reward more good county performances and remove players in bad form from Test cricket. I think that that is the only way to drive standards higher.

  • CurryCricketer wrote:
    May 10th, 2008 at 10.10 pm

    Ambrose & Collingwood still aren’t 100% either I’ve heard. I’d stick with Strauss & Cook at the top, Vaughan, Bell, KP then whoever the heck they want.
    Bowling wise I think Sidebottom, Hoggard (good in England) and Anderson + Monty should be the four man attack, with an all-rounder (Colly or Ravi) being the fifth bowler.

    Strauss is a quality player, he deserves the chance to try to regain form against the Kiwis - if he doesn’t show any improvement, then by all means chop him.

  • Will wrote:
    May 11th, 2008 at 8.53 am

    Hoggard’s back

  • raxar wrote:
    May 11th, 2008 at 11.11 am

    So Flintoff is injured and England are not playing at their best… so what’s the obvious thing to do?

    http://www.theage.com.au/news/cricket/bcricketb-england-issues-early-ashes-warning-to-australia/2008/05/11/1210444228356.html

  • Dicko wrote:
    May 12th, 2008 at 8.35 am

    When are England going to start picking on form instead of quirky trends, winks and past glories? If you want a batsmen - pick the bloke with the most runs in domestic cricket. If you want a bowler, pick the bloke with the best figures. Easy as falling off a log! If that means Ramps gets a crack at however old he is - great! Ever heard of a certain M Hussey? or perhaps D Leahman? You’ll always be rewarded by picking the best bloke going.

    As for beating Australia - yup, swing is definitely the key and it definitely swings a lot over here. Question though, who is harder to face with a swinging new ball: B Lee and S Tait (assuming he’s fit again) or Hoggard & Broad/Sidebottom? I suspect the answer to that may well decide the serries.

  • Kathy wrote:
    May 13th, 2008 at 7.08 am

    And Simon Jones gets a five-fer….. be still, my beating heart.

  • Comments

    Receive email updates on new comments


    « Early summer dupes the batsmen | Main | Hoggard returns; no cover for Collingwood »