Quotehanger

  • "It's pretty humbling, isn't it? For an old fisherman and surfer in Queensland, who now and then plays a bit of cricket."
    Matthew Hayden is overwhelmed at being Usain Bolt's favourite cricketer

    Aug 21, 2008

  • Recent Posts

    Try DVD rental for £3.99 per month!

    The headlines

    The news

    TWC



    Virender Sehwag goes a little bit bonkers

    By Will 5 months ago Leave a comment on this post

    I suppose I should salvage what few Indian fans I have left by at least mentioning Sehwag’s blistering knock today. Truth is, I only caught brief glimpses of it - just as much fun can be had getting your head around the legalese of the ICL and county players - but it was the speed of his innings which most stood out. He only has two gears: quite fast and very fast. And his footwork - or lack of - was fascinating to watch. He barely moved them an inch, at least to those few scorching drives I witnessed, which tells us two things: he has a ridiculously good eye and fast hands, and the pitch is a screamer.

    There was one particularly deft back-cut (you can never have enough late cuts, I say) which sped past the lone slip for four - a model of timing, placement and bravado. His feet didn’t move, he just wafted the bat and it flew away for four. When you’re on a roll…

    Still, I was slightly alarmed by all the praise. “Sehwag is an all-time Indian great,” commentators gushed. Steady on. He’s unstoppable on his day, and if South Africa keep feeding him boundary balls he’ll give Brian Lara’s record a run for its money. But he’s no Lara.

    Is he?

    Tags: , , , , |

    29 Responses to “Virender Sehwag goes a little bit bonkers”

  • Tybalt wrote:
    March 28th, 2008 at 10.07 pm

    Well, Lara’s better in circumstances where everything around him is going haywire - few great Test batsmen have ever had to fight as many rearguard actions as Brian Lara unless you think of John Reid as a great batsman.

    But Sehwag is clearly his equal in generous circumstances. When a batsman is truly in his pomp, there are few in postwar history (except obviously Viv, and I suppose his idol Tendulkar) who have the majesty of Sehwag.

  • shankar wrote:
    March 28th, 2008 at 10.16 pm

    Dude, no one says Sehwag is a Brian Lara. Infact commentators have only hailed him to be one of Indian greats. When one has twice achieved a feat which no other Indians have done, I think he deserves this praise.

  • shankar wrote:
    March 28th, 2008 at 10.52 pm

    Tell me one thing, whats your point here? I am sure dont have much to praise. Screamer pitch, no footwork at all..
    Agree pitch is flat.. but so are many other pitches and lots of matches being played on those pitches. Not every now and then do you a player scoring 300. Not to mention, Smith and Kallis, rated higher than sehwag had first use of this screamer track. Dude learn to give credit when due and be generous in that.

  • shankar wrote:
    March 28th, 2008 at 10.54 pm

    and dont you ever think Indian fans are begging to be salvaged by your distorted/biased views. get a life man.

  • Will wrote:
    March 28th, 2008 at 10.56 pm

    Get over yourself! As I say above, I didn’t even watch it. And there wasn’t much footwork - there never is - but that isn’t to belittle his innings. That’s just your assumption I’m afraid.

  • Hugh Jarse wrote:
    March 28th, 2008 at 11.19 pm

    Shankar - you are typical of the worst of the modern cricket fans. You idolize players without any knowledge of the game and abuse anyone who dares to think differently. This is cricket not Bollywood or MTV but you are too stupid to know that. It’s you that needs to get a life. Dude

  • shankar wrote:
    March 29th, 2008 at 12.20 am

    Hugh - Thanks for your judgement on my knowledge of the game. I will certainly try to improve it and start daring to think differently. lol!

    To answer you, I am not idolizing Sehwag here. I was just questioning why mention he is not lara (when noone hailed him to be) who undoubtedly is a legend.

  • Gonzo Cricket wrote:
    March 29th, 2008 at 2.38 am

    You weren’t just questioning the Lara point, you pulled out the persecuted Indian fan card, not once, but twice.

    I think that’s now taken over as my least favourite cricket fan persona above the mindless Australian yob who won’t shut up about subcontinental chuckers.

    Will did give credit where it’s due. Sehwag has a brilliant eye, but never ever moves his bloody feet

    I’m waiting for the “I told you so” article from Ian Chappell on cricinfo though…. :)

  • Marcus wrote:
    March 29th, 2008 at 3.35 am

    Sehwag is an Indian great. If I had to choose the greatest ever Indian Test XI, he’d definitely open along with Gavaskar. Think about it- who else, apart from Gavaskar, has bettered him among Indian openers? Not too many that I can think of.

  • Alastair wrote:
    March 29th, 2008 at 4.32 pm

    yes good ole Sewage had the good grace not to go for the 401. Quite right and proper too. He played well on a pitch which, if this were an timeless test would probably never end. Never mind.
    It was Sachin who I felt sorry for.

  • Sid the Kid wrote:
    March 31st, 2008 at 4.55 am

    Will, as an Indian cricket fan, I am distressed by the comments above. Will urge you not to bother too much about them and keep giving us the insightful snippets.
    You are absolutely correct about Sehwag’s amazing hand-eye coordination.And his lack of footwrk- which he makes up for by somehow getting into superb body balance to hit the ball really hard. However, We have seen Sehwag score on more lively pitches too. he was the most successful Indian batsman in Aussie tour of 2003 . And try to check out his century on debut against S.Africa ( I think in Jo’berg, not sure though)- with lot more movement and bounce! Its inexplicable , but he has an instinct for batting , Veeru does! His last ten triple-figure scores are all 150+, and not all have come on pitches that were screamers!

  • Mick wrote:
    March 31st, 2008 at 7.16 am

    Well now; 6 months ago were you saying Sehwag was an all time Indian great? I think not…

    It’s just another media bandwagon.

  • AS Gill wrote:
    March 31st, 2008 at 8.55 am

    To my indian friends, I ask you to forgive the british for their ignorance of sehwag.They shall continue to sing lara’s praise till the end of their days.It’s because he scored 2 huge triple hundreds against them and also coz he has a 500 in that sham -county cricket.

    All time great ,lara is.Agreed.Wait till viru’s finished.When
    he hangs up his boots we’ll see the record books.
    I’d like to enlighten you on viru’s record.He has hundreds against every1 ,everywhere.Except test hundreds in new zealand.I remember that series as 1 in which ind-100 all out ,nz -110 all out was the perennial scoreline.England on pitches where ‘foot movement’ is ‘necessary’.South africa where there is pace and bounce.195 & 150 in aus.
    triple hundreds in ind and pakistan.
    Lara great but at the same points in their respective cricket lives, viru’s better.I grant english fans the right to hail and idolise lara though.

  • AS Gill wrote:
    March 31st, 2008 at 9.03 am

    Also except for dravid and jaffer who batted with viru every1 elsestruggled against the south african line up.Their bowling attack is like aus, better actually ,without the hype.South africa always gets left arm spinners to india and makes them bowl over the wicket outside the leg stump.This also is not easy to score against.See what viru did to him.Also this blog doesn’t matter, I know for a fact he is one of the most liked indian batsman around the world.Every1 likes watching him bat.
    In multan 300 against fully fit shoaib,sami,saqlain,shabbir(when he wasn’t called for chucking).These are good bowling line ups.Personally, my favourite is his unbelievable 195 at the MCG.He slaughtered the bowlers even after they resorted to fully defensive lines and fields.

  • AS Gill wrote:
    March 31st, 2008 at 9.05 am

    BTW lara’s 400 pitch was flatter.

  • Marcus wrote:
    March 31st, 2008 at 2.08 pm

    Lara’s pitch may have been flatter, but Lara smokes bigger cigars. So there. :-)

  • AS Gill wrote:
    April 1st, 2008 at 8.41 am

    LOL@Marcus.Maybe he does,lara.
    But trust me on this 1 viru’s got test hundreds everywhere ,except lanka where he hasn’t been to and new zealand for reasons mentioned above.Indians from all regions of india absolutely adore lara.96 world cup,every windes match was sold out coz lara was a huge draw.They didn’t come to see the windies ,they came to see lara.Infact lara might be more popular in india than viru,especially in the south.
    BTW,Lara might smoke cigars,viru smokes ‘beedis’ & ‘hukkas’.So there.

  • Marcus wrote:
    April 1st, 2008 at 9.22 am

    Well, you don’t need to convince me about Sehwag- he’s one of my all-time favourite players. And it’s good to see that his hukka habit hasn’t affected his fitness. Maybe more people should take up the hukka- after all, look what it does for New Zealand rugby. :)

  • Alex wrote:
    April 1st, 2008 at 12.49 pm

    am surprised there are so many to play down sehwags innings, dead pitch, tame draw, etc etc. south africa had scored 540, and dominated the entire test except when sehwag was batting, had he been out for a hundred, would india have folded up early and then indulged in a typical fourth innings hara kiri against steyn, ntini and a left arm spinner?

    lara scored his 400 and 365 against england. hayden helped himself to a 380 against bangladesh, and why should tendulkar be wary, he has never been a big century man. kambli had a better appetite for double hundereds in the 2 odd years he played test cricket.

    In 75 odd years of indian cricket and no one has scored a triple hundred, and then you have a guy who scores two against pakistan and south africa in the space of 3 years, well at times you should give the devil his due, even if he is indian!

    the guy hit a six to reach his first triple hundred. and that was months after being caught out in the deep trying to hit a six when on 195 against australia.

    now that is personality and personality goes a long way in my books!

  • Pins wrote:
    April 1st, 2008 at 10.31 pm

    Well, as a train-spotter, I am just going to say that Hayden got his 380 against Zimbabwe - little difference, in the overall scheme of things.
    And the way Sehwag is going he will get his chance to get a hundred in New Zealand. Let’s just hope he gets to play at Maclean Park. Now test cricket has moved away from Eden Park - even I may have to make the trip to watch him.
    Having not had any coverage over here, I cannot comment on his inning, but ieven on the flattest of pitches, this is test cricket - one mistake and you are done.
    About Sehwag being a great, well let’s go with Gill, let’s take a look at the end of his career.
    But with three of the fastest seven double-hundreds in test cricket, no-one can deny that he is one of the most devastating batsmen to play the game. Note - I said one of.

  • raxar wrote:
    April 2nd, 2008 at 9.33 am

    I don’t mean to nitpick, but Hayden scored his 380 against Zimbabwe, not Bangladesh.

  • AS Gill wrote:
    April 3rd, 2008 at 9.22 am

    Now credit should be given where its due.No I am not talking about viru.Forget him.Dale steyn has conclusively proved he is the BEST pace bowler in the world right now.
    He’s bowled india out at home for “76″.Granted ,no sachin,only 5 batsmen,terrible pitch, but “76″.Hoping bhajji polishes them up quickly.This might be the most humiliating loss ever and the BCCI is mainly responsible.Mr.Pawar needed/needs votes from different state associations,hence even after they make crap wickets nothn is done to them.I’d like a financial penalty.
    Both the madras and the ahemadabad pitches have destroyed the game.Whatever happened to the ‘indian turners’.The indian team has absolutely no control on the pitches that are served up, which is stupid in a way.This is our home series isn’t it.We don’t get indian wickets in Africa.Why in the name of god are these fools dishing up home wickets for SA.I can clearly remember the last time SA came to india for a one day series.It was tied 2-2 & the Eden gardens calcutta match was somthn like this.African wicket,smith loved it,ganguly wasn’t in the team so believe it or not the local crowd booed india and cheered for SA.It forced 1-2 players from india to come over to mumbai and make comments like,”Nice to be back in india”.Thankfully the crowd’s with the indians this time.

  • JII wrote:
    April 3rd, 2008 at 1.05 pm

    A pitch on which SA scores 200+/4 can’t be crap. It’s just a combination of very good fast bowling backed up by very poor batting. Dravid was the only one who got an unplayable ball. Hope there is a turnaround in the 2nd innins. Also, I like t when we blame it on Sachin’s absence. These days,in tests, the guy fails more often than he scores and still we give his absence as an excuse.

  • Pins wrote:
    April 3rd, 2008 at 8.51 pm

    Well is he? Dale Steyn - best bowler right now. His stats are tremendous, yes, but how much cricket has he played away from home, and how well has he done. Irregardless of that fact, he did dominate New Zealand in South Africa.

    But this is a four-match series, and yet again someone, in this case you, have based something on the one performance.

    Whereas Ryan Sidebottom, destroyed the New Zealander’s in three tests and he definitely has to be up there. And they were flat tracks aswell.

    But like you said - credit when it’s due. To comeback and take five wickets on the first day to roll the Indians, after their 1st test batting performance, mainly by the one man, but still - is a great effort.

  • Pins wrote:
    April 3rd, 2008 at 10.23 pm

    And, how can you forget LEE. All the wickets he took against Sri Lanka in those series’.

  • Aadityaveer Singh Gill wrote:
    April 4th, 2008 at 9.17 am

    Well sachin was the top scorer in tests in australia wasn’t he.Did well in england too.May be you don’t watch enough test cricket.Pitch independent bowling makes steyn what he is.Ntini is an example of a pitch dependent bowler.Also lee tended to frustrate the indians out on their tur.He bowled a consistent 5th, even 6th stump line going further away for 5 balls in an over generally and then cut in 1.Steyn does everything off the stumps.He’s an out and out attack bowler.Lee against Sri lanka I don’t know ,but you can play him out.He kept getting nicks didn’t he??The african keeps bloody knocking the stumps out.Bowls a mean bouncer too.
    Also ,it’s a 3 match series.Essentially ,that means india can’t win the series unless miraculously they draw this one(no rain in ahemadabad).India with sreesanth did this to SA in joburg(all out for 84).SA have evened it out,and how.Majola CEO of SA board had said smith and his boys will thump india.Huge statement to make on an india tour.I can’t see an australian team management member or team member saying somthn like that.
    Check steyn’s record, more than 5 wickets per test.Over the years lee has a bigger stature but instantaneously my vote goes to steyn.I believe for an year or so atleast until maybe he gets injured due to excessive cricket ,he will be the no 1 test match wicket taker.

  • Mick wrote:
    April 4th, 2008 at 9.21 pm

    Damn, please put a space between your sentences man.

    Enjoying the 2nd Test? I am.

  • Aadityaveer Singh Gill wrote:
    April 8th, 2008 at 5.24 am

    Let’s see what happens in the 3rd test.

  • Abhishek wrote:
    April 16th, 2008 at 1.03 pm

    I don’t agree that Sehwag is an all time great player. I feel he is more lucky than good. Anyways I have come across this great fantasy cricket website, IndianFanTasyLeague.com, where you can create your own team and win great prizes! Registration is absolutely free.

  • Comments

    Receive email updates on new comments


    « The greatest beard since WG | Main | Charlotte Green is human after all »