Yep, agree with you all the way about this article. Complete dud. Berry didn’t offer any solutions apart from the “cut down the workload,” which as you point out is a nonsense, and seemed to have no other idea of what to do about England’s lousy batting, bowling and fielding, other than a new cry of “drop the keeper,” which he’s been shrieking every week since about 2002 in default of having anything else to say.
For the record - the reason why Prior’s there is because there’s currently a dearth of good keepers, especially batsmen-keepers, in England. Foster might be an option, but I’m not convinced by his keeping (I’ve seen him miss some real clangers) and his batting isn’t as good as Prior’s. Read’s batting definitely isn’t world class for all his brilliant keeping, and as for Ambrose, he couldn’t displace Prior as keeper at Sussex, where he played as a batsman, so why’s he a better option for England? That leaves Luke Sutton. Nuff said.
Irritating though it is to say it, maybe England should try and work with what they have, rather than what we’d like them to have. And maybe certain correspondents should keep their pens capped unless they have something intelligent to write.
