<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neck and crop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/</link>
	<description>Peering down the corridor of uncertainty.  It's about cricket, sport and journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/comment-page-1/#comment-177100</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/#comment-177100</guid>
		<description>I quite like it, although personally if it were mine I&#039;d shift the header to the right so that either the writing or the logo lines up with the main post column. Both for aesthetic reasons and to help lead peoples&#039; eyes to the right place. And then if the header is too cluttered, shift the search box down into the righthand sidebar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite like it, although personally if it were mine I&#8217;d shift the header to the right so that either the writing or the logo lines up with the main post column. Both for aesthetic reasons and to help lead peoples&#8217; eyes to the right place. And then if the header is too cluttered, shift the search box down into the righthand sidebar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JF</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/comment-page-1/#comment-177057</link>
		<dc:creator>JF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/#comment-177057</guid>
		<description>Pah! I like it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pah! I like it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/comment-page-1/#comment-177046</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/#comment-177046</guid>
		<description>what new site? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what new site? <img src='http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/comment-page-1/#comment-177044</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 18:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/#comment-177044</guid>
		<description>@ Fiona and Kathy:
If you want to talk about cluttered, go check out the New York Times site (http://nytimes.com).  In comparison, I think the design on The Corridor is relatively straight-forward and has a great sense of style while still keeping content clarity (not quantity) first and foremost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Fiona and Kathy:<br />
If you want to talk about cluttered, go check out the New York Times site (<a href="http://nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://nytimes.com</a>).  In comparison, I think the design on The Corridor is relatively straight-forward and has a great sense of style while still keeping content clarity (not quantity) first and foremost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/comment-page-1/#comment-177030</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/#comment-177030</guid>
		<description>I give it a 3 out of 10, Will. Asyou mya remember, I&#039;m doing a Master&#039;s on Information Architecture and Design, and having done a heuristic evaluation on your old site ( and got top marks for the assignment, by the way!) I have to tell you that   &quot;cool&quot; does not equal &quot;usability&quot; - as the designers of the the London 2010  Olympics Logo discovered! 

Your designer has fallen into a similar trap - he needs to take a closer look at W3C guidelines for Web Accessibility. 

As Kathy points out, there&#039;s not enough contrast and it&#039;s too cluttered. Simple, it ain&#039;t. Not one iota. It is  very difficult for anyone with visual problems. Like me. No, I&#039;m not colour blind or obviously &quot;disabled&quot; (are they not welcome at your site?) but I won&#039;t visit a site like this for leisure. 

It&#039;s also now looks like a hundred other sites - pretty generic. Sorry, but a big thumbs down from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give it a 3 out of 10, Will. Asyou mya remember, I&#8217;m doing a Master&#8217;s on Information Architecture and Design, and having done a heuristic evaluation on your old site ( and got top marks for the assignment, by the way!) I have to tell you that   &#8220;cool&#8221; does not equal &#8220;usability&#8221; &#8211; as the designers of the the London 2010  Olympics Logo discovered! </p>
<p>Your designer has fallen into a similar trap &#8211; he needs to take a closer look at W3C guidelines for Web Accessibility. </p>
<p>As Kathy points out, there&#8217;s not enough contrast and it&#8217;s too cluttered. Simple, it ain&#8217;t. Not one iota. It is  very difficult for anyone with visual problems. Like me. No, I&#8217;m not colour blind or obviously &#8220;disabled&#8221; (are they not welcome at your site?) but I won&#8217;t visit a site like this for leisure. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also now looks like a hundred other sites &#8211; pretty generic. Sorry, but a big thumbs down from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/comment-page-1/#comment-177025</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/#comment-177025</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an old stick-in-the-mud. I hate change.

I think there&#039;s not enough contrast between the white of the background and the very very pale grey of the headings and boxes, particularly when you&#039;re commenting. And on the main page I think the no2 and no3 posts are too close together â€” need more of a margin between them.

Otherwise, I&#039;m sure it&#039;s very pretty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an old stick-in-the-mud. I hate change.</p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s not enough contrast between the white of the background and the very very pale grey of the headings and boxes, particularly when you&#8217;re commenting. And on the main page I think the no2 and no3 posts are too close together â€” need more of a margin between them.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s very pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/comment-page-1/#comment-177023</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/#comment-177023</guid>
		<description>Looks nice, although the pages are taking a while to load.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks nice, although the pages are taking a while to load.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/comment-page-1/#comment-177019</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 06:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/#comment-177019</guid>
		<description>So a new look, to go with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://stumpcam.blogspot.com/2007/06/espn-buys-cricinfo.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new boss&lt;/a&gt; hey Will?

BTW - nice look.  Particularly &quot;cricket&quot; with predominantly white and a hint of red...Cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So a new look, to go with the <a href="http://stumpcam.blogspot.com/2007/06/espn-buys-cricinfo.html" rel="nofollow">new boss</a> hey Will?</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; nice look.  Particularly &#8220;cricket&#8221; with predominantly white and a hint of red&#8230;Cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpryCorpse</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/comment-page-1/#comment-177012</link>
		<dc:creator>SpryCorpse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/06/12/neck-and-crop/#comment-177012</guid>
		<description>Not a bad &#039;facelift&#039;.  Yes, it is a cool sort of effect.

Seems a tad anaemic though and a little difficult to distinguish the major &#039;columns&#039; of the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a bad &#8216;facelift&#8217;.  Yes, it is a cool sort of effect.</p>
<p>Seems a tad anaemic though and a little difficult to distinguish the major &#8216;columns&#8217; of the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
