Andrew should have noted that all England coaching careers have to end in failure.
Australian coaches end because of getting sick of all that tiresome success.
England needs to get any recently retired Australian cricketer. Steve Waugh? He could probably play and coach actually….
Duncan’s departure
By Will last year, mid-April Leave a comment on this post
We knew it was coming, so it came as no surprise that Duncan Fletcher today resigned as England coach. As Andrew Miller notes in his piece, all coaching careers (like politicians’) have to end in failure. Fletcher, for all his faults in the past 18 months, has been the single most important figure in the English game over the last eight years. England needs someone new, less jaded and cynical - a bright-eyed replacement with fresh ideas. But let’s not forget what he has given to his adopted country.
Your thoughts? Are you sad, surprised or sullen about his resignation? Who should replace him?
Tags: 2007-world-cup, duncan-fletcher, england, resignation |
13 Responses to “Duncan’s departure”
April 20th, 2007 at 1.22 am
April 20th, 2007 at 2.59 am
I have to agree with SpryCorpse. It wasn’t Andrew Miller, it was Simon Barnes at The Times who wrote it and I think it’s loosely written.
Who says coaches have to end in failure? I’m quite certain John Buchanan is about to end in glory.
I’d need some time but I reckon I could dig up a good list of Soccer, Rugby, Cricket and other coaches who retired having won a Championship or Tournament.
It was a sensational tidbit. Made for punchy and fun reading though.
April 20th, 2007 at 6.19 am
Yup.. the first time I read the piece (can’t remember who wrote it though) I thought it was a bit of a sweeping statement. Anyway, who wasn’t surprised at Fletcher’s resignation? You’d have to be buried 6 feet underground - or live in America, maybe - to not be surprised.
Lots of coaches and all that seem to retire after the World Cup, that this is the one GOAL they’ve been striving for (though not England, though, heh). Does this happen all the time? Did a whole legion of coaches and players retire after the 2001 WC? I admit, during the last World Cup I was still a snotty-nosed teenager completely uninterested (not disinterested) in cricket.
April 20th, 2007 at 7.49 am
Personally I’d like to see someone like Atherton have a crack at the job.
As evident in his column, he has numerous plans to save England’s woes.
April 20th, 2007 at 8.09 am
The viciousness with which the English treat the defeated continues to sicken me — and the calls for bloodletting and sacking smack of scapegoatism, particularly when calls are being made by former players/captains who did no better in the World Cup. Personally, I don’t give a flying one about the World Cup anyway. The All Blacks are usually the best rugby team in the world but they always crap out in the Rugby World Cup (except for the once, when they were captained by David Kirk, who is now chief executive of Fairfax Media, the Australian media company which owns half New Zealand’s newspapers and is right now stripping half the staff out of them — so maybe they won under him because he was a tough, smart nasty shit). And the shit always hits the fan and all the management get sacked and it makes no bloody difference.
As for all this crap about planning right now for the World Cup in four years time — how ridiculous. You could pick whoever you liked right now to be your brave new team for 2011 but to guarantee that squad’s form, fitness and availability four years’ in the future would require more prescience than the Almighty possesses. It’s nonsense talk.
Well done, Duncan Fletcher. Thanks for everything. You didn’t serve the crap and abuse you got. And if they sack Michael Vaughan, then English cricket can go fuck itself, because I won’t be following it anymore. There’s no way I trust the judgment of the numerous pundits who pontificate about the captaincy when they’re the very ones who thought it was a smart idea to appoint Flintoff for the Ashes when any fool could see what a stupid idea that was. And I don’t say that in hindsight — I was saying it way before the series started.
Vaughan hasn’t been given the chance to find his form after being out of the game for a year. He’s the best leader they’ve got. Appointing Collingwood would just be another case of fucking up your best allrounder (and he is now the best allrounder, rather than Flintoff whose form is just as much a concern as Vaughan’s) and Strauss isn’t exactly in form either. The England side started getting their shit back together when Vaughan was returned to the captaincy and they never would have made the CB series final if it wasn’t for his skilled handling of the crucial game that knocked NZ out. As for his form, he’s not the only one who performed on the poor side during the World Cup. There’s a whole list of them. The team went into their shell. You can’t just blame one or two players.
April 20th, 2007 at 9.15 am
Kathy I know what you mean about Former Players Who Failed slagging off the current lot - its a bit buttock-clenching.
In my conspiratorial mind I strongly suspect that the England dressing room is in turmoil because of the appointment of Flintoff as captain. Widely seen outside the the ECB as a dodgy idea - Freddy as a larger-than-lfe, jack-the-lad character was great as a goto talisman but such a big personality does not a captain make however. Unquestionably Vaughan was returned to the fold at the earliest opportunity to get the captaincy out of Freddy’s hands when it was realised that it was a mistake. However one mistake has begot another and Vaughan’s repeated failures with the bat are hardly a surprise given his lack of practice. This has undermined his own position. Furthermore the stripping of the vice-captaincy from Freddy can be seen as a manoeuvre to ensure that he never again captains England rather than a suitable punishment for his misdemeanours. Does Freddy suspect this? Is he disaffected? Fletcher may well view the current off-the-field mess (which may or may not be of his making) as a headache he can do without. He may feel that the present England side is poisoned beyond recovery and something best walked away from.
The Fletcher-Vaughan combo was an unqualified success for England until Vaughan’s knee gave way. It was period that took England to a second place Test ranking and regained the Ashes. Not a bad effort at all. So thanks for that Fletch - you can smile now.
April 20th, 2007 at 9.38 am
AgainsttheWall — I agree, the whole handling of Freddie was a complete mess that the England management have definitely bent over backwards to extricate themselves from this year. Last year it was patently obvious that Strauss was having some success and could be the brain to lead the Freddie brawn in Vaughan’s absence, but I got the feeling that the management were so scared of “upsetting” their national hero Freddie that they made the wrong decision. And what a balls-up has transpired from that decision. I’m not at all convinced that the Ashes debacle should be laid at Fletcher’s feet. It’s not as if Monty would have turned the whole series round as the Fletcher critics would have us believe. I think the team were demoralised from a year of upheaval — four different captains, a raw bowling line-up, players just back from injury (and not just Giles — FLintoff as well) — you would have had to have been a magician, not just a coach, to fix that lot.
April 20th, 2007 at 12.48 pm
It has to be conceded that Vaughan’s injury was dreadful luck for England.
Australia has been blessed by steadiness at the helm since AB took the reins. No significant injuries to him or Taylor or Waugh or Ponting (touch wood) over the years.
England desperately needs Vaughan to recover physically , recover form, and spend the next three or four years in firm control. If he can’t do it, Strauss is the obvious choice.
I didn’t originally think Flintoff’s selection as skipper was a mistake. Imagine if it had worked!
But it didn’t (certainly not all Flintoff’s fault) - the team didn’t seem inspired by him.
April 20th, 2007 at 2.06 pm
Fletcher gave me one of the greatest days of my life (12th September 2005) I’m truly grateful.
As for a successor - looks like Peter Moores is going to get the ECB nod. No real problem with that, but it does mean that Kevin Shine is more likely to keep his job, and he’s been atrocious as bowling coach. A new man coming in from outside like Moody would want to pick his own backroom staff.
April 20th, 2007 at 6.16 pm
Is there any chance of offering Troy Cooley enough of a secure contract to tempt him back as bowling coach?
April 20th, 2007 at 11.58 pm
Nick —— yeah, letting Cooley go was one big screw-up by the ECB. They should have given him anything he wanted. And all he wanted was a two-year contract, wasn’t it?
April 21st, 2007 at 11.40 am
Apparently so. Given what he got out of Harmison, the ECB were mad not to offer him what he wanted. Smart move by the ACB to approach him at just the right time, it must be said.
May 6th, 2007 at 1.45 am
Kathy.You seem to get it right most of the time.
Was there any point in going to university?
Anyway, I’ve been out of commission for a while but the answer to your question [put it on Geraint Jones-should he resign or something sight]is:-
Laura Nyro album ‘Christmas and the Beads of Sweat’.
Track ‘Blackpatch’.Worth searching out along with her others.Just a play on the words ‘party’ and ‘Jones’.
Anyway, it’s not just the interminable keeper spot but everyone from 1 to 11 plus captaincy that needs deep thought as always.
Comments
« Wherefore art thou, Pakistan? | Main | Brian Lara retires from international cricket »
