<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Wait there, mate&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/</link>
	<description>Peering down the corridor of uncertainty.  It's about cricket, sport and journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:16:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fiona</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-175371</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-175371</guid>
		<description>Wraye, just to get back to you 10 days later, and answer your little question about &quot;what was R(icky P(onting) doing at the BBC?&quot;

Dear Wraye! RP is not Ricky Ponting, but Received Pronunciation! Wot used to be known as &quot;pure&quot; spoken English! as spoken byQueen and BBC newsreaders once upon a time! No doubt Queen still does.

Such glory days are obviously long gone, especially if you lot don&#039;t even know what RP is!! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wraye, just to get back to you 10 days later, and answer your little question about &#8220;what was R(icky P(onting) doing at the BBC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Dear Wraye! RP is not Ricky Ponting, but Received Pronunciation! Wot used to be known as &#8220;pure&#8221; spoken English! as spoken byQueen and BBC newsreaders once upon a time! No doubt Queen still does.</p>
<p>Such glory days are obviously long gone, especially if you lot don&#8217;t even know what RP is!! <img src='http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-175370</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-175370</guid>
		<description>Wraye, just to get back to you 10 days later, and answer your little questionabout &quot;what was RP doing at the BBC?&quot;

Dear English lady! RP is not Ricky Ponting, but Received Pronunciation! Wot used to be known as &quot;pure&quot; English! and BBC newsreaders only ever spoke RP!

Such glory days are obviously long gone, especially if you lot don&#039;t even know what RP is!! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wraye, just to get back to you 10 days later, and answer your little questionabout &#8220;what was RP doing at the BBC?&#8221;</p>
<p>Dear English lady! RP is not Ricky Ponting, but Received Pronunciation! Wot used to be known as &#8220;pure&#8221; English! and BBC newsreaders only ever spoke RP!</p>
<p>Such glory days are obviously long gone, especially if you lot don&#8217;t even know what RP is!! <img src='http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-175092</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-175092</guid>
		<description>Clearly the most logical conclusion here is that Australians in fact don&#039;t speak English, and therefore &quot;Yes/No mate&quot; is as natural and right as &quot;Oui/Non&quot; or &quot;Ja/Nein&quot; would be.

Heaven knows, while us Englanders continue to enunciate with (near) perfect diction, much the of the world is shoehorning the language into various new configurations.  Perhaps in a few hundred years&#039; time, it will be taught in its pure form in schools, like Latin is today.

Cor blimey, ma, say it aint so... *sob* [stiff upper lip trembles]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly the most logical conclusion here is that Australians in fact don&#8217;t speak English, and therefore &#8220;Yes/No mate&#8221; is as natural and right as &#8220;Oui/Non&#8221; or &#8220;Ja/Nein&#8221; would be.</p>
<p>Heaven knows, while us Englanders continue to enunciate with (near) perfect diction, much the of the world is shoehorning the language into various new configurations.  Perhaps in a few hundred years&#8217; time, it will be taught in its pure form in schools, like Latin is today.</p>
<p>Cor blimey, ma, say it aint so&#8230; *sob* [stiff upper lip trembles]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leithj</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-175084</link>
		<dc:creator>Leithj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-175084</guid>
		<description>Just attended the Australian Under 15 National Cricket Championships in Canberra. Pleased to report there were plenty of &quot;mate&quot; comments and even a few &quot;matey&quot;&#039;s. Judging from the standard of play it seems like plenty of years of more pain coming your way, Will.
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just attended the Australian Under 15 National Cricket Championships in Canberra. Pleased to report there were plenty of &#8220;mate&#8221; comments and even a few &#8220;matey&#8221;&#8217;s. Judging from the standard of play it seems like plenty of years of more pain coming your way, Will.<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-175030</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-175030</guid>
		<description>Using mate in cricket has been around for a fair amount of time... 

For certain in the 8 years I&#039;ve been playing competitive cricket, &#039;yes, mate&#039; has been occasionally uttered - in particular when you are batting with a good mate (heh). You&#039;ll find whenever an Australian player does it, he will be with a noted friend within the team; Ponting with Hayden, Hayden with Gilchrist, Symonds with everybody. 

Friendship and unity within a team is better than chaos and fractures right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using mate in cricket has been around for a fair amount of time&#8230; </p>
<p>For certain in the 8 years I&#8217;ve been playing competitive cricket, &#8216;yes, mate&#8217; has been occasionally uttered &#8211; in particular when you are batting with a good mate (heh). You&#8217;ll find whenever an Australian player does it, he will be with a noted friend within the team; Ponting with Hayden, Hayden with Gilchrist, Symonds with everybody. </p>
<p>Friendship and unity within a team is better than chaos and fractures right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simply wondered</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-175025</link>
		<dc:creator>simply wondered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 14:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-175025</guid>
		<description>sprycorpse and chris: yes, mates. have to agree with both of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sprycorpse and chris: yes, mates. have to agree with both of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174962</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 02:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174962</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll stop saying mate if the poms stop that stupid glove touch.  Bell ducks under a bouncer, Pieterson calls him over, presumably to say &quot;well ducked old chap&quot;, and they glove touch.  An easy push for a single to long on, great shot, glove touch.  Save it for the big shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll stop saying mate if the poms stop that stupid glove touch.  Bell ducks under a bouncer, Pieterson calls him over, presumably to say &#8220;well ducked old chap&#8221;, and they glove touch.  An easy push for a single to long on, great shot, glove touch.  Save it for the big shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpryCorpse</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174958</link>
		<dc:creator>SpryCorpse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174958</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected, simply w.
Tho Symonds may actually be talking to the bowler.  &#039;Yes, mate [bowl me some more of that rubbish]&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected, simply w.<br />
Tho Symonds may actually be talking to the bowler.  &#8216;Yes, mate [bowl me some more of that rubbish]&#8216;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simply wondered</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174957</link>
		<dc:creator>simply wondered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174957</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t be so daft! there&#039;s a world of difference between : &#039;wait, mate&#039;, &#039;wait; yes&#039; and &#039;mate, wait; yes, mate&#039;. and aren&#039;t we missing the point? symonds doesn&#039;t exactly need to run much when the bloody thing keeps disappearing ever deeper into the crowd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t be so daft! there&#8217;s a world of difference between : &#8216;wait, mate&#8217;, &#8216;wait; yes&#8217; and &#8216;mate, wait; yes, mate&#8217;. and aren&#8217;t we missing the point? symonds doesn&#8217;t exactly need to run much when the bloody thing keeps disappearing ever deeper into the crowd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpryCorpse</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174956</link>
		<dc:creator>SpryCorpse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174956</guid>
		<description>Are Symonds and co. in danger of having their &#039;Yes, mate&#039; calls being misinterpreted as &#039;Yes. Wait.&#039; ?
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are Symonds and co. in danger of having their &#8216;Yes, mate&#8217; calls being misinterpreted as &#8216;Yes. Wait.&#8217; ?<br />
 <img src='http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simply wondered</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174954</link>
		<dc:creator>simply wondered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174954</guid>
		<description>javed miandad was alleged to have three calls: &#039;go&#039;, &#039;no&#039; and &#039;whoah&#039; - must be urban myth; wouldn&#039;t he have called in urdu?

we played against a guy we called deon - his call was &#039;deon one&#039; (or two etc).

the call i would like outlawed is &#039;can you?&#039; - should be answered with &#039;none of your fucking business, MATE&#039;.
nearly as bad is &#039;not now&#039; - so you&#039;re going to wait a couple of minutes &#039;til the ball is actually in the keeper&#039;s gloves before attempting a run? also sounds like you&#039;re treating the guy at the other end like a naughty schoolboy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>javed miandad was alleged to have three calls: &#8216;go&#8217;, &#8216;no&#8217; and &#8216;whoah&#8217; &#8211; must be urban myth; wouldn&#8217;t he have called in urdu?</p>
<p>we played against a guy we called deon &#8211; his call was &#8216;deon one&#8217; (or two etc).</p>
<p>the call i would like outlawed is &#8216;can you?&#8217; &#8211; should be answered with &#8216;none of your fucking business, MATE&#8217;.<br />
nearly as bad is &#8216;not now&#8217; &#8211; so you&#8217;re going to wait a couple of minutes &#8217;til the ball is actually in the keeper&#8217;s gloves before attempting a run? also sounds like you&#8217;re treating the guy at the other end like a naughty schoolboy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174941</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174941</guid>
		<description>Good points unspeakable.

Did you watch how best mate Matthew Hayden somewhat shepherded Andrew Symonds to his first test Century in Melbourne? That&#039;s what &quot;mates&quot; are for. That&#039;s what &quot;mates&quot; are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points unspeakable.</p>
<p>Did you watch how best mate Matthew Hayden somewhat shepherded Andrew Symonds to his first test Century in Melbourne? That&#8217;s what &#8220;mates&#8221; are for. That&#8217;s what &#8220;mates&#8221; are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174936</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174936</guid>
		<description>And I.


&lt;b&gt;Full name&lt;/b&gt; Andrew Symonds
&lt;b&gt;Born&lt;/b&gt; June 9, 1975, Birmingham, Warwickshire, England

England fluffed that opportunity didn&#039;t they? ;)

And regarding &quot;terminological inexactitude&quot; Scott, it pisses me off when people can&#039;t talk with the slightest sense of grammar and spelling. No matter where they come from. 

U no wot I meen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I.</p>
<p><b>Full name</b> Andrew Symonds<br />
<b>Born</b> June 9, 1975, Birmingham, Warwickshire, England</p>
<p>England fluffed that opportunity didn&#8217;t they? <img src='http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And regarding &#8220;terminological inexactitude&#8221; Scott, it pisses me off when people can&#8217;t talk with the slightest sense of grammar and spelling. No matter where they come from. </p>
<p>U no wot I meen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174931</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174931</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t think you can get rid of me that easy Caroline. I&#039;ll be haunting the Corridor for a long time to come!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think you can get rid of me that easy Caroline. I&#8217;ll be haunting the Corridor for a long time to come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unspeakable</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174926</link>
		<dc:creator>unspeakable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174926</guid>
		<description>I know the article here is more like poking fun, but I think it does bother some English commentators since I&#039;ve heard it referenced in the past.  

To me, the usage of &quot;mate&quot; by the Aussies is just one of many positive team-mate supporting thing they do in batting partnerships.  They are always talking mid-pitch between balls etc.  Many other teams (particularly England) don&#039;t communicate verbally much at all.  I really think this communication between the Aussies is a contributor to why they are so strong a team.  The usage of &quot;mate&quot; automatically makes you feel like you&#039;ve got a mate there batting with you, rather than just a colleague propping up the other end.  It&#039;s a psychological positive.  England should try it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the article here is more like poking fun, but I think it does bother some English commentators since I&#8217;ve heard it referenced in the past.  </p>
<p>To me, the usage of &#8220;mate&#8221; by the Aussies is just one of many positive team-mate supporting thing they do in batting partnerships.  They are always talking mid-pitch between balls etc.  Many other teams (particularly England) don&#8217;t communicate verbally much at all.  I really think this communication between the Aussies is a contributor to why they are so strong a team.  The usage of &#8220;mate&#8221; automatically makes you feel like you&#8217;ve got a mate there batting with you, rather than just a colleague propping up the other end.  It&#8217;s a psychological positive.  England should try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caroline</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174924</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174924</guid>
		<description>Hey Will, I like it . . . again . . .

Yeah, so you probably are grasping for something to have a go at, but it&#039;s your blog: you go for it, mate!  

For what it&#039;s worth, Kathy was also only having a laugh, in case you can&#039;t understand humour, and was infact the first to point out the apparent lack of a rational argument here.  

Surely Scott has something more interesting for you guys to read and comment on, on his new blog?  Something with a more &#039;strine&#039; slant?  Then we can get on with venting our unjustified frustrations without condemnation.

Hey Will, is the preview button busted, or is it just my &#039;puter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Will, I like it . . . again . . .</p>
<p>Yeah, so you probably are grasping for something to have a go at, but it&#8217;s your blog: you go for it, mate!  </p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, Kathy was also only having a laugh, in case you can&#8217;t understand humour, and was infact the first to point out the apparent lack of a rational argument here.  </p>
<p>Surely Scott has something more interesting for you guys to read and comment on, on his new blog?  Something with a more &#8217;strine&#8217; slant?  Then we can get on with venting our unjustified frustrations without condemnation.</p>
<p>Hey Will, is the preview button busted, or is it just my &#8216;puter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174912</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 12:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174912</guid>
		<description>Kiwi, SA and Zim cricketers use the term, as well as us and you lot, so the post does come across as tinted by a little hostility.

On the claim itself, I think you&#039;re just tracking Roy&#039;s influence on the game.  He&#039;s the only regular user of &#039;mate&#039; in run calls.  There&#039;s nothing at all mannered about it; he&#039;s just a better example of the broad Australian accent and lexicon than anyone else in the current Oz batting lineup.  A well-known Australian social imperative then requires those batting with him - Clarke, for instance - to use the term more often themselves.  That&#039;s my theory, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kiwi, SA and Zim cricketers use the term, as well as us and you lot, so the post does come across as tinted by a little hostility.</p>
<p>On the claim itself, I think you&#8217;re just tracking Roy&#8217;s influence on the game.  He&#8217;s the only regular user of &#8216;mate&#8217; in run calls.  There&#8217;s nothing at all mannered about it; he&#8217;s just a better example of the broad Australian accent and lexicon than anyone else in the current Oz batting lineup.  A well-known Australian social imperative then requires those batting with him &#8211; Clarke, for instance &#8211; to use the term more often themselves.  That&#8217;s my theory, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174903</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174903</guid>
		<description>It was a tongue-in-cheek remark. Clearly I&#039;ve struck a nerve here. Relax, people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a tongue-in-cheek remark. Clearly I&#8217;ve struck a nerve here. Relax, people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174902</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174902</guid>
		<description>That&#039;d be like stopping the West Indies calling each other &quot;man&quot; (or should that be &quot;mon&quot;) and outlawing the high five.

So Will, mate, she&#039;ll be apples, it&#039;s &quot;too easy&quot;...mate... (or would you prefer Pommie B@stard?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;d be like stopping the West Indies calling each other &#8220;man&#8221; (or should that be &#8220;mon&#8221;) and outlawing the high five.</p>
<p>So Will, mate, she&#8217;ll be apples, it&#8217;s &#8220;too easy&#8221;&#8230;mate&#8230; (or would you prefer Pommie B@stard?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174900</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174900</guid>
		<description>Yeah ok. It was a pointless rant. But it got you all talking...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah ok. It was a pointless rant. But it got you all talking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpryCorpse</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174897</link>
		<dc:creator>SpryCorpse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174897</guid>
		<description>Maybe the excessive use of &#039;mate&#039; between wickets was in response to Nixon&#039;s incessant trash-talk behind the stumps.  I have no doubt that it would drive me quickly insane.  And the Aussies that I saw looked under significant pressure although they played it pretty well (Ponting and Clarke, and Symonds in the end).  So if they were to act in command and cocky between the wickets it may be a bit of a pressure release.
Am I stretching?
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the excessive use of &#8216;mate&#8217; between wickets was in response to Nixon&#8217;s incessant trash-talk behind the stumps.  I have no doubt that it would drive me quickly insane.  And the Aussies that I saw looked under significant pressure although they played it pretty well (Ponting and Clarke, and Symonds in the end).  So if they were to act in command and cocky between the wickets it may be a bit of a pressure release.<br />
Am I stretching?<br />
 <img src='http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wraye</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174896</link>
		<dc:creator>Wraye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 07:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174896</guid>
		<description>er... by the way, Fiona? When did Ricky Ponting work for the BBC?



:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>er&#8230; by the way, Fiona? When did Ricky Ponting work for the BBC?</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wraye</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174895</link>
		<dc:creator>Wraye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 07:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174895</guid>
		<description>I say, my dear old things, there are some jolly good eggs making absolute spiffing comments here, what ho! Simply splendid. Gosh. And mine, oh a large one please darling, ice and a slice! Top stuff!

and there goes another red bus ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say, my dear old things, there are some jolly good eggs making absolute spiffing comments here, what ho! Simply splendid. Gosh. And mine, oh a large one please darling, ice and a slice! Top stuff!</p>
<p>and there goes another red bus &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174890</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 05:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174890</guid>
		<description>Yes, I heard Atherton say &quot;mate&quot; to Vaughan, too - what are you  rabbitting on about, Will?

Kathy, don&#039;t be so self-righteous! I think Fiona&#039;s taking the piss, you know. Anyway, you could hardly call the English on this blog  gracious - Will&#039;s been having silly anti - Aussie rants for weeks now - so why is everyone else supposed to be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I heard Atherton say &#8220;mate&#8221; to Vaughan, too &#8211; what are you  rabbitting on about, Will?</p>
<p>Kathy, don&#8217;t be so self-righteous! I think Fiona&#8217;s taking the piss, you know. Anyway, you could hardly call the English on this blog  gracious &#8211; Will&#8217;s been having silly anti &#8211; Aussie rants for weeks now &#8211; so why is everyone else supposed to be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174889</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 05:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174889</guid>
		<description>We have to say &#039;mate&#039;. It&#039;s in the Mates&#039; Act.

One of the points about the Australian team is that we don&#039;t restrict our team to the upper-middle classes. Maybe if England made cricket a friendly sport to working class people they&#039;d be good at it too. Over recent years, we&#039;ve had the likes of Ponting, McGrath, Symonds, Michael Clarke and Jason Gillespie play matchwinning roles for Australia. If they&#039;d been born English, I doubt they&#039;d have been made welcome in the English set-up.

Needless to say, with this proletarian outlook, the average Australian cricketer&#039;s grammatical expressions do sometimes have terminological inexactitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have to say &#8216;mate&#8217;. It&#8217;s in the Mates&#8217; Act.</p>
<p>One of the points about the Australian team is that we don&#8217;t restrict our team to the upper-middle classes. Maybe if England made cricket a friendly sport to working class people they&#8217;d be good at it too. Over recent years, we&#8217;ve had the likes of Ponting, McGrath, Symonds, Michael Clarke and Jason Gillespie play matchwinning roles for Australia. If they&#8217;d been born English, I doubt they&#8217;d have been made welcome in the English set-up.</p>
<p>Needless to say, with this proletarian outlook, the average Australian cricketer&#8217;s grammatical expressions do sometimes have terminological inexactitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174886</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 04:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174886</guid>
		<description>Head- kicking again, Kathy?  Your favourite sport, isn&#039;t it. I&#039;m just playing along with Will&#039;s rant, It&#039;s just FUN, you know. You don&#039;t have to ALWAYS kick an Aussie in the head everytime when one of us actually  gives back to a Pom.

 By the way, just heard Mike Atherton. on the replay of the match on Foxpsports, greet Vaughan after winning the toss, with &quot; Well, mate....&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Head- kicking again, Kathy?  Your favourite sport, isn&#8217;t it. I&#8217;m just playing along with Will&#8217;s rant, It&#8217;s just FUN, you know. You don&#8217;t have to ALWAYS kick an Aussie in the head everytime when one of us actually  gives back to a Pom.</p>
<p> By the way, just heard Mike Atherton. on the replay of the match on Foxpsports, greet Vaughan after winning the toss, with &#8221; Well, mate&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 13th Man</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174879</link>
		<dc:creator>13th Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 02:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174879</guid>
		<description>The problem for you, &lt;i&gt;mate&lt;/i&gt;, is that they &lt;i&gt;were&lt;/i&gt; having a Sunday knock around in the park. Normal service has been resumed against you clowns, and you don&#039;t like it, do you?
Kathy: Fiona made a reasonable response to a completely spurious - and fatuous - comment by Will. If you Poms (or in your case, wanna-be Poms, like half of NZ) can&#039;t take it, don&#039;t start it. Stop bringing knives to gunfights. Hell: stop bringing a &#039;team&#039; to matches - you&#039;re only wasting everyone&#039;s time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for you, <i>mate</i>, is that they <i>were</i> having a Sunday knock around in the park. Normal service has been resumed against you clowns, and you don&#8217;t like it, do you?<br />
Kathy: Fiona made a reasonable response to a completely spurious &#8211; and fatuous &#8211; comment by Will. If you Poms (or in your case, wanna-be Poms, like half of NZ) can&#8217;t take it, don&#8217;t start it. Stop bringing knives to gunfights. Hell: stop bringing a &#8216;team&#8217; to matches &#8211; you&#8217;re only wasting everyone&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174878</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 02:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174878</guid>
		<description>Gosh, Fiona, and you&#039;re being a gracious winner again!

I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll find any of the Australian commentators know how to pronounce the name of their own country either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, Fiona, and you&#8217;re being a gracious winner again!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll find any of the Australian commentators know how to pronounce the name of their own country either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174877</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 02:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174877</guid>
		<description>ban the aussies from playing international sport!!!!  all cause we don&#039;t speak your type of english. u r right we speak australian, mate! and we r not paying no royalties.
The ponsie english team should stick to playing minnows
and yes u should stop writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ban the aussies from playing international sport!!!!  all cause we don&#8217;t speak your type of english. u r right we speak australian, mate! and we r not paying no royalties.<br />
The ponsie english team should stick to playing minnows<br />
and yes u should stop writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fiona</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174875</link>
		<dc:creator>Fiona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 02:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174875</guid>
		<description>If I hear one more Pom commentator say &quot;Or-stray-ya&quot;..
....then there&#039;s  the excessive number of glottal stops Londoners stuff up their mouths with...( actually, it goes far beyond glottal stops these days - hence  that missing  alveolar lateral approximant  from &quot;Australia&quot;)...to say nothing of all those missing &quot;haitches&quot;.... 

Hell, I haven&#039;t heard a Pom speak proper English for years! Not since they got rid of RP from the BBC.

Not being a bad loser,  again,  are we,  Will?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I hear one more Pom commentator say &#8220;Or-stray-ya&#8221;..<br />
&#8230;.then there&#8217;s  the excessive number of glottal stops Londoners stuff up their mouths with&#8230;( actually, it goes far beyond glottal stops these days &#8211; hence  that missing  alveolar lateral approximant  from &#8220;Australia&#8221;)&#8230;to say nothing of all those missing &#8220;haitches&#8221;&#8230;. </p>
<p>Hell, I haven&#8217;t heard a Pom speak proper English for years! Not since they got rid of RP from the BBC.</p>
<p>Not being a bad loser,  again,  are we,  Will?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/comment-page-1/#comment-174873</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 01:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2007/04/09/wait-there-mate/#comment-174873</guid>
		<description>Will, you&#039;re scratching.

You&#039;re unhappy and you&#039;re scratching for insults!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, you&#8217;re scratching.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re unhappy and you&#8217;re scratching for insults!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
