Quotehanger

  • "It's pretty humbling, isn't it? For an old fisherman and surfer in Queensland, who now and then plays a bit of cricket."
    Matthew Hayden is overwhelmed at being Usain Bolt's favourite cricketer

    Aug 21, 2008

  • Recent Posts

    Try DVD rental for £3.99 per month!

    The headlines

    The news

    TWC



    The big one! Australia v England, Super Eights

    By Scott last year, mid-April Leave a comment on this post

    Right then. Australia v England, 2007 World Cup. Actually Bangladesh kind of spoiled this by beating South Africa last night; had that gone to script, this would be a do-or-die dogfight for England. Now, England can still make the semi-finals even if they lose, as Andrew Miller pointed out. Still, Australia could take on England at Twister and there’d be an edge to the contest, and after losing the Commonwealth Bank finals, Australia’s quite keen to dish out some revenge to England. Revenge really motives Ricky Ponting.

    The main question about the Australian team is if they will go with an extra batsman or an extra bowler to cover the injury to Shane Watson. Brad Hodge has a claim for scoring a century in his last innings, but I would prefer to see Australia go with an extra bowler.

    Obviously an impartial writer would hope for a good close game, but I’m not impartial. I want England to be thrashed. I doubt it will happen mind you- England are getting to be good at derailing Australia’s best laid plans. In fact, I think England might just sneak a victory on this occasion. There’s been a few upsets about, and I think this might be another one.

    Scorecard.

    Tags: , , , , , , , |

    32 Responses to “The big one! Australia v England, Super Eights”

  • Fiona wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 2.30 pm

    Scott, just because there have been a few upsets, it doesn’t follow that England will get one. Been reading too much J. Agnew, have we? “Australia are due a loss” he said hopefully. Engalnd always think they are “due” something, That’s their problem.

  • Sean wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 2.44 pm

    Afternoon all. Listening on five live whilst at the in-laws. Just as Vaughan is bowled. Oh balls.

  • Scott wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 2.46 pm

    Woohoo go Tait!

    Fiona, I’m a born pessimist.

  • Wraye wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 2.49 pm

    And Vaughan goes again for bugger all. Why on earth do the selectors even let him neat a limited-over match? Save him for the Tests and get someone else in, please :(

  • Michael wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 2.53 pm

    The commentators are talking about pinch hitting right now and why England are not going with this strategy. We’re seeing two new flavours in the top 3 today and there’s still no basher

  • Scott wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 2.59 pm

    Woohoo go Tait x2!!!

  • Michael wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 3.11 pm

    Regarding dominating opening batsmen, Cricinfo writes:

    What England would give for an opening batsman who could dominate the opposition. Well, there is one, but sadly he has spent the winter back home due to illness. Marcus Trescothick flew home two weeks into the Ashes tour, but has been involved in Somerset’s pre-season. During a friendly against Devon today he has smashed 256 in a 30-over game, including 25 fours and 18 sixes.

    Now, that doesn’t sound like someone sick to me. It sounds like someone who can’t handle the pressure and runs away from it. What are your thoughts?

  • Michael wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 3.19 pm

    This is weird - Michael Clarke is bowling the 11th over, the first over of the second Power Play.

  • Sean wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 3.26 pm

    Michael - it sounds to me like someone who doesn’t like running at all!

  • Michael wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 3.33 pm

    Well Sean, if the best England can put on the park is Mehmood and Anderson then one musn’t read too much into the quality of the attack. I suppose you still have to hit it though.

  • Sean wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 3.34 pm

    McGrath is going for an over. That won’t last!

  • Sean wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 3.35 pm

    oops that should read 8 an over. Typing on a foreign laptop.

  • Wraye wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 4.15 pm

    whee! Dumbnut Vaughan is gone on and my Dearling Straussy with him but Pietersen and Bell are finding the boundaries. Fun game. Let’s see what happens next.

  • Michael wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 4.48 pm

    Masterful Powerplay set then.

  • Sean wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 4.54 pm

    Sri Lanka did this also - quite a good tactical move. It could all go horribly wrong now. England could be 200 all out or 300-6 after 50. I wouldn’t like to guess which way either although my natural pessimism leans towards the former.

  • Michael wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 5.06 pm

    You little beauty! WHAT a ball to Fred!

  • pamela wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 6.44 pm

    England bowled out for 247 - only a couple of decent scores, the rest single figures - I can’t see Fred, Jimmy Anderson, Sajid or Monty actually bowling out Gilchrist, Ponting, Hussey and co. Though Hayden might be a bit easier, after that dolly he dropped. After Bell’s wicket, England have, as planned, folded obediently.

    I do wish Strauss had done something, I was backing him even for the vice-captaincy. Cuh.

  • Wraye wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 7.13 pm

    hey, Pam, miracles can happen. OK, maybe not today :(

  • Michael wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 7.33 pm

    I was hoping for something from Strauss as well, I have been pushing for his inclusion.

    As for Hayden, he’s the best batsman in the world at present. It won’t be easy. Cuh on anyone thinking it’s Pietersen.

    That was a shocking hundred in my opinion. When he could have grabbed the match by the horns he batted for his hundred. The way he celebrated his 50 I knew he was playing only for himself.

    England will most likely tumble from the World Cup after this match, and in my opinion, it will all be this dickhead’s fault. Kevin Pietersen. He’s not a team player. He’s not a match winner.

  • Scott wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 7.52 pm

    Okay I slept through the England innings. And England got 247. Probably about par. I think if England bowl well they can still win this.

  • Wraye wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 7.56 pm

    Got one! Only nine more to go!

  • Scott wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 8.32 pm

    Aus 96 for 2 after 22 overs. I think it’s all up to Ponting now.

  • Michael wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 8.54 pm

    England were in a position to score 300. They fluffed it.

    Mark Nicholson is spending his superlative energy on Nixon right now and I tend to agree with him. Shock inclusion for the Comm. Series in Australia, he really has been quite a shiner for England. His effort the other day against Sri Lanka was awesome. His enthusiasm, yes even his chirp, is alright with me.

  • Scott wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 9.18 pm

    152 for 2 after 32. Ponting taking charge. Will in the commentary chair at cricinfo. Flintoff on to bowl and he’ll be looking for reverse swing.

  • SpryCorpse wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 9.37 pm

    Top effort from Ponting and Clarke so far. They’ve walked the line between too much risk and too little beautifully. A few times they’ve looked under pressure and a little jumpy but have managed to keep their heads. England are bowling reasonably without appearing particularly threatening. The fielding has been enthusiastic.

  • SpryCorpse wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 9.51 pm

    I wonder if Ponting sometimes thinks it’s unfair to the opposition that he’s so good.
    Two hundred up for the Aussies.

  • SpryCorpse wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 9.56 pm

    Ponting gone for 86.
    Should be too late for England.
    It would be nice though if Clarke decided to see it out to the finish.
    Symonds in.

  • SpryCorpse wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 10.07 pm

    I think Collingwood needs to give away the slower ball when bowling to Symonds.
    Bad luck for Pieterson on the boundary with that catch. He did well to save a couple of runs in the end.

  • Michael wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 10.08 pm

    Slower ball, FOUR.
    Slower ball, bizarre effort from Pietersen on the boundary. He caught it, tip-toed the boundary incredibly but could not maintain the balance and prevent flailing over the boundary so he backhand flings the ball back into play.
    Slower ball, SIX.

    Slower ones aren’t working Colly.

  • SpryCorpse wrote:
    April 8th, 2007 at 10.24 pm

    Symonds doesn’t seemed to have lost a lot of power or eye with his injury.
    An excellent little cameo. He looks very comfortable out there.

  • pamela wrote:
    April 9th, 2007 at 4.16 am

    Michael, I have to admit I quite like Nixon now - I was all against his inclusion, seeing as Chris Read has done absolutely NOTHING to warrant his exclusion from the WC squad (or should I say ICC 2007 World Cup….) but Nico really seems to have something, albeit at the ripe old age of 36.

    Anyway, pfft to England. The pity’s that they just don’t deserve to win, I’m tired of supporting a team that looks like they don’t want to be there. I don’t think it was so much that they were outfoxed completely by the Aussies, more that they just gave up, rolled over and died. Hell, I even hope Bangladesh beats them, the Banglas certainly seem to want it more than them.

  • Michael wrote:
    April 20th, 2007 at 8.09 pm

    More KP poking here. Check out the table at the footer of this article.

    Certainly the leading ODI batsman rankings are set to change. This table doesn’t even include Hayden’s latest hundred. You can move him to 1289 runs with 5 centuries.

  • Comments

    Receive email updates on new comments


    « Mark Waugh takes the long handle to Twenty20 | Main | Banger’s back (albeit against Devon) »