I liked both Andrew Miller’s and Sambit Bal’s takes on recent events. The ICC have shown themselves once again to be totally lacking in common sense. If I thought that all of the revenue was going towards grassroots cricket it might - might be a different story. But it so blatantly isn’t.
Who will rid me of this turbulant lawyer?
By Scott last year, at the end of March Leave a comment on this post
The ICC has stepped in to prohibit cricket clips of the World Cup being available online via YouTube. Andrew Miller skewers this incredible piece of stupidity here. I’m just left gasping at how ICC’s powerbrokers have managed to get themselves so ‘out of touch’ that they thought this was a good idea.
Short of actually prohibiting broadcasting of the games, they could not have made a worse decision. Imagine an attempt by ICC to prohibit cricket blogs or newspaper coverage or forums and you have an idea of how stupid this is. Does Malcolm Speed know how to turn on his PC?
Tags: 2007-world-cup, cricket-videos, ICC, malcolm-speed, stupid, video, youtube |
12 Responses to “Who will rid me of this turbulant lawyer?”
March 26th, 2007 at 7.53 pm
March 26th, 2007 at 8.09 pm
Honestly, the ICC aren’t the only ones taking this approach; they’re following a procession of other companies who are starting to attack You Tube and other video services.
It’s a dumb move and the organizers are indeed on a money grab. YouTube definitely has it uses, but the lack of organization and the number of pre-teens on there make it a virtually useless site to me.
I don’t care what they do. As a true cricket fan I am on a constant search for legitimate DVD/VHS footage anyway. In fact, just yesterday I pulled out my Connoisseurs of Cricket DVD featuring Richard Hadlee, Viv Richards, Doug Walters, Waugh Brothers and more.
Damn it, why is it FireFox spell check and MS Word can’t fix my pathetic attempt at spelling the word “Connoisseurs” but Google can?
March 26th, 2007 at 10.42 pm
Yet another paradoxical and short-sighted move by the ICC.
Why would you want to promote the game to millions, when its easier prevent the spread of the game? With India and Pakistan gone, you’d think the ICC would use the opportunity to push the game into ‘casual’ markets - markets where cricket is a played sport, but maybe 3rd or 4th played. Instead this move smacks of the ICC attempting to protect whatever revenue left in the World Cup, including TV rights.
March 26th, 2007 at 10.49 pm
It’s completely insane.
Of course there’s a point where people posting your copyrighted material on the net is eating into your ability to make money from it. But low-quality YouTube videos of a few minutes of a cricket match is not where you draw the line.
When it comes to sporting events, for everyone except the core fans, out of sight is out of mind. I don’t have Sky, so I’m just following the World Cup via the radio and the papers; it wouldn’t take much for me to tune it out altogether. This just makes it a little more likely. It kills a whole source of grassroots buzz that might keep people interested.
Harry
March 26th, 2007 at 10.59 pm
I couldn’t agree more with the article indicating how the ICC is fooling itself with it’s overzealous oppression of online coverage of world cup clips. What is the point of the ICC? Beyond a few creditable attempts to bring fringe nations into the fold, they seem to be presiding over a sport which risks permanent decline on a global scale.
You Tube is not their problem. Branded T-Shirts are not their problem. Rum imported to games in Sun-lotion bottles is not their problem. Nervous overprotection of commercial partners in the face of bleak times for the sport is going to cause major problems.
Still, at least we have the guile of New Zealand and Sri Lanka to stop us getting too depressed.
Best,
Chris
March 26th, 2007 at 11.09 pm
Scott, be careful what you wish for!
At this point, nothing would surprise me. Though I can’t help but wonder if recent events, and I include those of the past year, are signs of a deep disease in the ICC. At the moment, they appear to be trying to brush Bob Woolmer’s murder under the carpet, by virtually disassociating themselves from it, the way they have with so many issues. They appear toothless, but I wonder…..is there hidden agenda that’s only begining to show itself, with this sort of petty powerplay over YouTube?
March 27th, 2007 at 2.10 am
I’m totally failing to be moved by this. At all.
I can’t say I’ll miss watching grainy clips of cricket in second-long bursts (as the thing downloads) for one minute.
I also can’t say that watching a few home runs or touchdowns in the same crappy manner will suddenly convert me into a money-spending baseball or “football” fan.
Nope, I just don’t get it.
March 27th, 2007 at 12.27 pm
I think the ICC are just protecting their copyrighted material and have every right to do that. If YouTube would like to benefit from copyrighted material then they have to pay for it.
I also think there are better ways to promote cricket around the globe than through YouTube.
March 27th, 2007 at 12.35 pm
Of course they have every right to do it. I just think it’s a decision which is going to cost them goodwill and gain them nothing.
March 27th, 2007 at 3.34 pm
Excellent article by Andrew Miller, I thought. Like Harry R above, I am currently subsisting on a meagre diet of radio, newspaper and internet coverage, much of which is terrific of course, but there’s no substitute for the square meal of actually watching the games. The BBC’s late-night highlights are all very well, but by the time I’m able to sit down and watch the video, another match has already finished. I refuse to line Murdoch’s pocket (not that my wife would let me anyway), so all that’s left to me is to head for the pub. This will be the ruination of us all!
March 28th, 2007 at 2.59 pm
You might be interested to know that this year’s NCAA Basketball tournament was similarly banned from being shown on YouTube.
March 31st, 2007 at 1.20 pm
The ICC needs to take it’s collective head out of its collective ass and smell the real world.
Comments
« Bermuda vs Bangladesh, World Cup, Trinidad | Main | The Geoffrey Oi!cotts (disGrace on bass; Alan Knott on drums) »
