Quotehanger

  • I think those speed guns are a load of crap. Somehow the white ball goes faster - I bowled 83-84mph in the Test match, and 93mph in the one-dayers. It's crazy. I hadn't bowled a ball for ten days.
    Steve Harmison has his doubts about the pace at which he's been bowling

    Aug 28, 2008

  • Recent Posts

    Try DVD rental for £3.99 per month!

    The headlines

    The news

    TWC



    England v New Zealand, World Cup, Gros Islet

    By Will last year, mid-March Leave a comment on this post

    England’s opening World Cup match against New Zealand is making me very nervous indeed. I would rather they played anyone but the Black Caps (the “Blick Cips”) who always seem to perform better than you expect them to in a World Cup. Nevertheless, now’s the time for England to really show the tournament what they are capable of. Kevin Pietersen, please stand up, etc.

    Scorecard here. History of Gros Islet here. Chat below. Rock on.

    Tags: , , , , |

    94 Responses to “England v New Zealand, World Cup, Gros Islet”

  • basketer wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 11.49 am

    I will go with the NewZealand team. The England team is high on confiidence but again, their side is very inexperienced. As you said, NZ perfrom well under pressure.
    I did a post on comparison of wc squads to day check it out:
    World Cup 2007 squads batting comparison

  • pamela wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 12.03 pm

    I’ve just taken a 5 hour nap in preparation to stay up the whole night - the match starts at 9.30 pm for me. ARGH. with Jimmy Anderson and Vaughan all dodgy, Flintoff still not the man he used to be, Strauss probably not playing, it’s all just very worrying. England may have edged the “Blick Kips” (I love that!) out of the CB series, but NZ seriously, genuinely, absolutely outplayed Australia in the CH trophy. gaah.

  • Matt wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 1.20 pm

    Looking forward to it.

    I posted a gratuitous pic of the Carib Beer Girls, but hey … this is the Windies.

  • griff wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 1.31 pm

    No tv coverage available here in this baseball country Japan and the 5Live radio commentary online is always blocked to overseas listeners because of rights issues so does anybody reading this have an internet feed, video or just audio? Any Stickam streamers out there?

    Thanks

  • Matt wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 1.33 pm

    Ooooh. You naughty man - I didn’t put that in the comment.

  • Tobi wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 1.37 pm

    Griff, I have posted this in another comment but anyway ;-)
    The Kiwis are putting up a Radio broadcast for their games: http://www.radiosport.co.nz
    It’s free and it has decent commentary. Unfortunately you have to live with ads…

  • Matt wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 1.50 pm

    While I’m on the Corridor - can anyone recommend any new cricket blogs covering the World Cup.

    Cheers.

  • Will wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 2.01 pm

    Matt. No. This is the only one. Joyce gone. Fucking Muppet.

  • griff wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 2.02 pm

    Thanks, Tobi - it’s very comforting to hear the voice of Angus Fraser straight up, if not the bank ads…

    ..nor a wicket going down in the first over!

  • Scott wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 2.54 pm

    England dodge another runout bullet.. 2 for 34 after 12.

    Vaughan’s had a bit of luck but also played some classy shots.

    I want another tie. I don’t want to see either side doing well and I want Kenya to knock off one of them as well.

  • Will wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 4.33 pm

    Well well well. Watched the first half in the pub, which was encouraging when Colly and KP were going along. Get back to my flat, switch on my shiny new TV to listen to the radio - and they lose 3 for 1 in seven balls. Great. Welcome to the World Cup. Eejits, the lot of ‘em.

  • Will wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 4.33 pm

    Was the Flintoff dismissal as depressing as it sounds?

  • Caroline wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 4.42 pm

    Crap - this is not worth being woken at 1 in the mrning for!

    But seriously, is there any better way to enjoy an England collapse, than by clicking the refresh button in between solitaire games? Only to see three wickets go down in one hit!

    Think I’ll try Tobi’s NZ link . . .

  • Wraye wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 4.46 pm

    Sigh. Another England collapse. Where did this blogline go to then, Will? Matt and I missed you for a couple of hours.

  • Coalster wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 4.54 pm

    In an attempt to be an eternal optimist, if we can somehow scrape 200, would that be enough on this pitch?

    I can’t watch it so can’t tell how much of this latest collapse is feckless batting, and how much is the pitch. I suspect its 99.5% vs 0.5% in favour of feckless.

    At least it appears I’ve found a new favourite word, feckless

  • Kathy wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.13 pm

    FLintoff’s performance was just as depressing as it sounded Will, all one ball of it. Once again he has failed to make any contribution at all with the bat but seems to be immune to English criticism. The commentators are still going on about what a bully he is with the bat. Since when? I think Plunkett has probably scored more runs than Flintoff this year.

    Nixon and Plunkett are hanging in there, as I speak. Plunkett can hit the ball. Nixon can reverse sweep. Sometimes. ;-)

    I got up at 2.30am for this and was just as nervous as the England batsmen looked.

    Feckless is a fine word, Coalster.

  • Caroline wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.15 pm

    Can’t even win a trick at solitaire: utterly, utterly . . . well, feckless, really . . .

  • Kathy wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.17 pm

    You’re right, Will. I tested myself and I DO say: “Blick Cips.” And “fush’n'chups”. For all you foreigners who can’t tell a Kiwi accent from an Aussie one, ask them to say fish’n'chips. The Aussie, of course, will say: “feesh’n'cheeps”.

    Oooh, a reverse sweep to the boundary! Go Badger!

  • Kathy wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.21 pm

    Pardon me while I talk to myself — Nixon and Plunkett are putting some of their higher order colleagues to shame. I love a bit of lower order grit.

    So, er, you’re playing solitaire by yourself, Caroline? ;-)

  • Coalster wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.25 pm

    200 up. I’m feeling strangely more confident now! I’m sure that will disappear within 10 overs of NZ’s reply…

  • Caroline wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.27 pm

    Hi Kathy,

    Is there any other way to play? Or is there some sexual reference there of which I am completely unaware?

    Which leads me to my next comment - to tell a Kiwi from an Aussie accent, ask them to say “six”.

    By the way - our fortunes must be looking up: I won a game . . .

  • Caroline wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.28 pm

    Hey - how’s that for fortune telling - we made 200!!!!! YAY!!

  • Wraye wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.33 pm

    Hi all, oh laugh myself silly here listening to the radio. Nixon and Plunkett did bring us up to a reasonable total, but the fact that TMS are now saying that England are in with a chance is, er … fecklessly optimistic, at best. Caroline, are you playing with cards or on the PC?

  • Kathy wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.35 pm

    No, no innuendo intended, though as soon as I posted it, I realised it sounded a bit wink-wink! I just meant: are you the only one up in your household.

    Nixon and Plunkett were fantastic. England will have to field and bowl as tight as tight to defend this.

    England looked very nervous, didn’t they, particularly up the order. Vaughan looked very angry at himself for getting out. He needs to stop playing daft shots because he looked liked he was playing well. He needs to redeem himself by squeezing the best out of the team in the field.

  • Caroline wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.35 pm

    Well, 209 is better than it could have been, thanks Mr-Flintoff-tosser.

    Just finish my game of ’solitaire’, then off to bed. Goodnight all, and go you slow bowlers . . .

  • Scott wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.37 pm

    Stop whining, you Poms. At least your not getting tonked by the South Africans like the Netherlands are.

    That was a great partnership between Plunkett and Nixon though. England looked like going out for less then 160 at one point.

  • Caroline wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.42 pm

    Well thanks for that Scott - that puts it all back in perspective!

    For those who asked, I’m the only one up (having been woken at 1.00am by a small semi-conscious child climbing on me) and I’m playing on the pc, whilst flicking the refresh on BBC every now and then . . .

    Just won the last game, by the way, so England may be in with a chance! Stranger things have happened . . .

    See ya!

  • Coalster wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.44 pm

    Scott, its only a matter of time before we do (assuming we scrape past Kenya and Canada).

    To be fair, we should only judge the England total once New Zealand have knocked off the runs. I think its about 30 runs light of par, but that didn’t stop the Windies beating Pakistan…

  • Kathy wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.51 pm

    Well, Flintoff had better do something with the ball because I’m seriously hacked off at him.

  • Coalster wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.56 pm

    Kathy, remeber all the talk before the Champions Trophy about how he might open the batting?

    I’m not sure he knows how to play or what he’s trying to do at the moment. Lately he seems to get out to tentative shots outside the off stump (instead of the more usual lame pulls to midwicket/deep midwicket/long on).

    Its as if he’s trying to rein himself in and not get out, rather than just batting and going with his instinct.

    Having said that, its just one innings, albeit an important one..

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.59 pm

    Gibbs has just hit six 6’s in an over.

  • Scott wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 5.59 pm

    Gibbs has just tonked dan Bunge for six 6’s in an over.

  • Coalster wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.00 pm

    6 6s in an over for Gibbs vs the Cloggies!

  • Coalster wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.01 pm

    Dare I suggest the bowler was (van) Bunge-ing the balls down to him?

  • Kathy wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.02 pm

    I’m not jumping on Freddie just for this innings. I can’t remember when he last batted well. He has forgotten how to bat.. I think he completely lost his confidence in Australia while trying to captain. And he’s bowled very tightly lately, but I can’t remember when he last got a good bag of wickets.

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.03 pm

    The one thing Kathy and I get along with is the whole Flintoff situation. It’s so shambolic that when Pietersen was out the Commentators wrongfully announced Flintoff was out to a shocker first ball.

    They then realized their mistake and Flintoff gave them a reprieve an over later. Out to a shocker first ball.

  • Wraye wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.05 pm

    Good point Kathy, the Man-god FF seems to be immune to critisism without performing in the field. Every wretched game, we here about the explosive partnership that KP and Fred are going to implement to destroy the opposition. Have we seen this happen yet? They have to bowl like possessed now. If Fleming gets his eye in, we will all be early to bed tonight.

    It could be worse as Scott said, Herschelle Gibbs hit six 6’s in an over. P.S. Scott - I have plenty of wine in tonight ;)

    Whee! a wicket already. Now ther’s a thing!

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.05 pm

    Thanks to the Gibbs annihilation Kallis should be able to milk himself to a century here.

  • Wraye wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.11 pm

    Freddie must have been reading the blog, he finally contributes to the game - 3 for 2! Good job I bought all that wine. Looks like I’m going to need it.

  • Coalster wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.12 pm

    I should think that catch should make you feel better towards Freddie…

  • Kathy wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.12 pm

    Freddie, all is forgiven. What a catch!

    I hope you stayed up, Caroline.

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.18 pm

    You guys better get Fleming early. Forgot to add him to my list of soft-spot players yesterday. He has the ability to win this thing himself. South Africa and all those fans in Jo’burg will remember well…

  • Coalster wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.24 pm

    On another note, the Dutch must really be poor if Kallis can get to his ton at better than a run a ball

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.24 pm

    Kallis just registered his 15th ton with a beauty! Six over long off.

  • Raj Solanki wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.26 pm

    Thx Micheal for inviting me here :)

    I agree Flemming needs to go early. Fleeming was lucky when he did not get tht close LBW decesion.

    well i just got on and flemming is out ;)

  • Coalster wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.26 pm

    Thanks for that Michael.

    One lazy shot later, and Fleming is out.

    Can we (Poms) dare to dream?

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.26 pm

    It turns out to be Kallis’ first ton in World Cups.

  • Raj Solanki wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.29 pm

    Hi all

    my money is with England.

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.30 pm

    Most welcome. Boucher about to record fastest World Cup ODi Fifty…

  • Wraye wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.36 pm

    Just a quick aside, although I should be supporting the Associates, and although SA have never been one of my favourites, I am enjoying the tonking they are getting from pure venial “Schadenfreude”. The Netherlands took part in my Girls tournament last month - the first ever held in Germany. They told us they were not very good … we had 10 years olds who had only been playing for 6 months in this tournament.

    So the NL sent their National team and tonked everyone out of the hall. So, “Hello, big boys in orange! Now you know how my little girls felt!” Ha!

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.42 pm

    Most sixes now in an ODI. South Africa has scored 175 in the last 11 overs. Kallis just hit 3-in-a-row.

  • Raj Solanki wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.53 pm

    phew !! it took 3 to 4 ppl to fix something to let me post here :)

    Looks like england loosing plot here. They need to introduce Monty now.

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.54 pm

    Not just because he is Indian, right Solanki? ;)

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 6.58 pm

    You know Solanki; Monty went for 4.23 an over at 37.90 with only 10 wickets in the Ashes and 4.60 an over at 37.88 with only 9 wickets in the ODI series right?

    He’s a character no doubt; but as with Flintoff, is getting undue attention and praise.

  • Raj Solanki wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.00 pm

    Well monty by birth is brit :)

    if u see how Patel and vettori bolwed on this track u should get clue . also monty is strike bolwer wkt taker :)

  • pamela wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.09 pm

    Ah well. I’m still wishing Strauss played, I swear he’d have done good, but that might just be me. Joyce caught one to reprieve himself of his duck, but I’m still sure Strauss would have got at least 2 runs.
    I doubt England can win, anyway.

    on the subject of Monty, he’s a bit like Leverock, isn’t he - a pretty decent spinner, but gets more attention for other things.

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.11 pm

    You guys all falling asleep out there or what?!

  • Raj Solanki wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.15 pm

    Well game is boring :) looks like NZ will win :)

  • Raj Solanki wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.19 pm

    heheehe took 3 balls for monty :) game is on now :)

  • pamela wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.19 pm

    at least this game looks far less one-sided than SA vs Holland.

    Monty’s got a wicket!
    hurrah! Monty leaps.

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.22 pm

    Put 5 slips back there Vaughny!

  • Raj Solanki wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.23 pm

    Vaughny needs to bring back strike bowler now !

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.25 pm

    I liken Monty to an over-excited child on Christmas morning; presented with such a sight and not knowing how to handle the abounding of joy and enthusiasm welling up inside. What ends up happening is a hodge-podge of jittery nervous energy. Or something.

  • Muff Diver wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.25 pm

    For the guy who wanted to know about other cricket blogs - there’s a really good blog run by a close mate of Will’s … a chap called Andrew Nixon. Will, what are the details for that as he speaks really highly of you.

  • pamela wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.29 pm

    Michael, I think that’s exactly how Strauss described Monty a few months back!
    I think that’s why the fans love Monty so much, he clearly loves cricket more than anything else. Maybe that’s why Harmy doesn’t have that many fans.. heh. There was that story of the footballers who tried to Monty-leap after a goal…

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.31 pm

    Then Strauss and I have another thing in common; we’re both not out there batting and doing what we really love :P

    Hi Pamela, nice to meet you. Are you English?

  • Raj Solanki wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.35 pm

    who is here watching Wcup live on Direc TV ?

  • pamela wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 7.37 pm

    hehe.
    No, I’m not actually, though I was born there - I’m in Singapore now. Mad supporter of England, though, and embarassingly India as well.

  • Raj Solanki wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 8.01 pm

    {yawn}

  • pamela wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 8.03 pm

    Strauss is fielding - his first World Cup experience. Pity, really, I think England are either too quick to jump to new players, or too slow to move off old ones.

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 8.04 pm

    Such a shame ;) We had something going there.

    Jokes aside, how is Singapore treating you? Must be gorgeous this time of year! If not all year…

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 8.20 pm

    “18.3 Langeveldt to van Bunge, FOUR, slides it down the leg side and flicked away. Ashoka de Silva, the umpire, who is watching the game from the sidelines makes the stop!”

    So when he’s not giving poor LBW decisions he’s out there trying to prevent runs from the minnows ay?

  • pamela wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 8.27 pm

    I still think nothing beats Billy Bowden getting hit by Geraint Jones - classic stuff. One good thing Jones did during the Ashes.

    Singapore’s busy drenching our shoes at this time of year, but the cricket-wise it’s a desert. I’ve resorted to hanging out at cricket nets spying on the fat wobbly expats and their little children pretend to bat and bowl.

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 8.30 pm

    That was brilliant, and wasn’t ol’ Crooked Finger angry when it happened? Banged the ground in disgust is what it looked like to me!

    Sounds like fun - I don’t mind the heat, came from northern Queensland myself. Why don’t you jump in and have a bat yourself?

    Avagoyermug is the slang. ;)

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 8.34 pm

    Pietersen just found his fielding form he had in Ashes 2005…

  • pamela wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 8.49 pm

    he might drop another 5 more catches, that’ll even things up, maybe it’ll be good enough for a squeezed WC win - just like the Ashes.

    I think it’s hilarious how some of the English journalists hyped up England after they won the CB series, declaring that they could win the WC and all that. 3 games does not a world-class ODI team make! They can smash Bermuda all they want, when the time comes, England ARE still ranked right at the bottom.

  • Michael wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 8.58 pm

    I have nothing to add ;)

    Well… flip the coin and you get pretty much the same thing. You dominate for 10 years (losing virtually nothing), go through the CB Series 7-1, hiccup in the finals and burp in New Zealand, and suddenly the wheels have fallen off and people start to wonder if you can beat Scotland.

    I guess time will tell. No matter what happens, it’s very difficult to find a good journalist out there.

  • Tom wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 9.11 pm

    I’m confused - who should I be supporting…England or New Zealand!!?

  • pamela wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 9.17 pm

    Maybe England can get 6 wickets within 6 runs?
    no, that’s the end of the match.

  • Scott wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 9.18 pm

    Well, NZ did that easy in the end!

  • Larry Teabag wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 9.31 pm

    Bloody hell. I go to the pub with everything looking good at 19 for 3, and now we’ve been thrashed. Well at least I didn’t stay in and watch it, I suppose.

  • Fiona wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 9.42 pm

    Just saw the final score - how very pleasant! as a Scottish friend of mine would say.

  • Matt wrote:
    March 16th, 2007 at 10.50 pm

    I stand by my prior prediction:

    “England need:

    * KP to grow up.
    * Freddie to turn up with a bat.
    * No one to do anything *too* stupid.”

    That’ll be 3 out of 3 then.

  • Kathy wrote:
    March 17th, 2007 at 1.17 am

    Michael, I can’t help but agree on both Monty and Freddie, both hyped to the hilt, and can do no wrong, regardless of actual performance. While Monty should have been selected earlier in the Ashes, the hype about it from the cricket writers was so ludicrous that we were supposed to believe he would have made the difference between winning and losing. Which is utter nonsense.

    But then, I can’t believe what I heard Nasser and Atherton saying during commentary today. They said that England’s problem was that they didn’t have any bowlers who took wickets, and that you couldn’t expect Monty or Freddie to take more than one wicket per match. I’m SORRY??!! What the hell are they there for then? And why on earth is FLintoff no 4 in the world in the ODI bowlers’ list if he’s not expected to take wickets? Well, he’s certainly living down to expectations, as there seemed to be no criticism implied in the commentators’ remarks. So one of the world’s top ODI allrounders is not expected to get runs or take wickets, and he’s not being criticised for it either? I don’t get it. Well, at least he’s economical. And takes the odd catch. Maybe they could swap him for Gilo and no-one would notice. And I mean no offence to Ashley Giles since I admire him very much and respect him hugely for the dignified way he handled the shit heaped on him in Australia.

    ANyway, that was a very depressing loss, made more depressing by sleep deprivation which I don’t seem to handle very well these days — sign of creeping decrepitude. I think the two sides are pretty evenly matched but the Blick Cips played better on the day. On the England side, great grit showed by Nixon and Plunkett. If Nixon keeps this up, who knows what might happen to his career?….. tests (cough, cough)…

  • Wraye wrote:
    March 17th, 2007 at 7.05 am

    … he’ll be dropped, of course.

    Then he can go back to Leicestershire, my home county and help them win. Yah!

  • Ashwin wrote:
    March 17th, 2007 at 8.21 am

    I can see a lot of English supporters here. First of all, congratulations on winning the tri series down under. That was SOMETHING. Way to go!

    Now, coming onto the world cup, I see the media all the time talk about Collingwood, Flintoff and Pietersen. Oh,ofcourse…how can i forget to mention..Vaughn’s knee! What happened to the rest of the guys? Too much hype given to your star players. Guys, your top order better fire. Thats the only way Kev and Flintoff are going to be one bit effective. Im sure, I dont see those two steadying the ship, say, after the score is 21/3. They are instinctive players. And they perform best that way. You have gone down to the Kiwis. The good thing is , this is only the starting of the world cup. And the world cup always has this weird history of teams peeking at right time. Losing NOW is better than losing later. Im saying this, not because Im being optimistic. But I truly do believe England have the potential to make it to the semi finals. After that, its anyones game. Now, when I say the top order has to fire, Im not talking about 130/3 mates. Im talking about a century from any one of ur top 3 batsmen…and at least somewhere in the range of 200 within 35-40 overs for Freddie to come in and play his little cameo. You guys have a good bowling attack to defend something in the range of 260-270.. not 210.

  • Ashwin wrote:
    March 17th, 2007 at 8.27 am

    Oops..I forgot to mention. Its time England won a world cup. At the same time, I dont mind S.Africa (who have always deserved to win) or India (my home country)win. But yeah…I think, England do deserve to bag one and you guys should be good enough to do it this time. Please stop those damned Aussies. Cant take another aussie world cup win! That..Ricky Ponting …%$#%$%#^(censored)

  • Wraye wrote:
    March 17th, 2007 at 9.06 am

    One German newspaper, “The World” (Die Welt), is reviewing the Cricket World Cup, with that perverse Hun mixture of misunderstanding and confusion. According to them, the WC is the 5th largest sporting event in the world - apparently the USA basketball championship pips us.

    I just loved this quote, “the men in their tight, long trousers …”

    Well, really? I guess as a scorer I was concentrating too much on the fat, old umpires and missed out on all that.

  • Nick Jones wrote:
    March 17th, 2007 at 10.51 am

    Too many England players eating meals on the balcony. One minute I spotted Vaughan sucking up strips of linguine, and then after Pietersen had lobbed to long on (or was it long off?) I spotted him scoffing his food.
    Is this some new regime? No meal until you’re back from the middle? Surely this has not been thought out. KP probably was starved.
    So don’t the players eat together anymore? I wasn’t allowed to leave the table until everybody has finished, and it never did me any harm!!!

  • Tobi wrote:
    March 17th, 2007 at 11.54 am

    Wraye, I just read the article mentioned above. I must say I have read worse things in Germany about Cricket. (Of course with your quotation you have a point ;-)) The Financial Times Germany had a couple of weeks ago a feature about Cricket that seemed even less well investigated.
    But is it true that they offered TV rights to Germany as well??? Heck, why didn’t anyone buy that??? At least an hour of highlights on Eurosport. Is that too much to ask for???

  • Wraye wrote:
    March 17th, 2007 at 4.43 pm

    Sigh, all too true Tobi, but they asked for too much money and apparently there is not a bit enough market in Europe. Moan, groan. :(

  • Peter wrote:
    March 18th, 2007 at 12.24 am

    Go the Black Caps!!! I don’t even feel sad for England. As they say, class will float to the top!

  • Michael wrote:
    March 18th, 2007 at 5.32 pm

    Kathy, you are spot on in your dismay at the Commentators. I have nothing to add at all. Flintoff’s demise has been an absolute shocker and it is a real shame.

    Cricket needs to open a School of Commentary lead by Mark Nicholas and Bill Lawry. And I am dead serious. Mark Nicholas is a scholar in terms of his knowledge of the game and the very few mistakes he makes, Bill Lawry is your excitable type that is so lacking from this World Cup. I believe Mark Nicholas even told his team that he wanted “More Bill Lawry out of everybody today”.

    I still can’t believe Tony Cozier’s comments to the Irish captain after the tie with Zimbabwe. “You couldn’t want a better start to the World Cup than this?” How about a win.

  • Web Traffic - April - Report on Larger Referrers wrote:
    May 2nd, 2007 at 5.58 pm

    [...] have also been writing about the Cricket world cup, and the International Cricket [...]

  • Comments

    Receive email updates on new comments


    « Ireland win a tie | Main | Ireland v Pakistan, World Cup, Kingston »