Sarwan literally came out swinging. First ball he tried to lash it through the offside with no foot movement at all and was lucky to survive. He has played some classier shots since, but there is still a sense of urgency to his batting. Chanderpaul is batting slower than the worst of them - Sunil ought-to-shut-my-mouth Gavaskar.
West Indies v Pakistan, World Cup, Kingston
By Will last year, mid-March Leave a comment on this post
At last it’s here. The opening match of the 2007 World Cup gets underway this afternoon (or this morning. Or even this evening, depending on where you are) at Kingston. The hosts, West Indies, against Pakistan. We’re doing ball-by-ball commentary for every match, along with our usual bulletins, verdicts, photos, galleries, blogs and thoughts from our chaps at the grounds.
Dileep Premachandran is out there at the moment, albeit without his luggage which is on a Parisian holiday, and has provided a preview.
As ever, keep an eye on the scorecard post your thoughts on the game.
Tags: 2007-world-cup, live-coverage, pakistan, west-indies |
10 Responses to “West Indies v Pakistan, World Cup, Kingston”
March 13th, 2007 at 3.36 pm
March 13th, 2007 at 6.00 pm
I think 241 will be enough. Samuels is finally showing the class we all knew he had. And POW! What a finish!
March 13th, 2007 at 6.48 pm
Yeah baby! No sense in bashing a six second ball if you’re going to slash and out third ball. Goodbye Nazir.
March 13th, 2007 at 8.18 pm
Two of the most combustable and inconsistent teams in world cricket, so with Pakistan languishing at the moment, expect at least two more twists in the game.
March 13th, 2007 at 8.51 pm
You can’t expect anything out of inconsistency. Perhaps expect the unexpected? Makes it fun doesn’t it?
March 13th, 2007 at 10.43 pm
Beg to differ from your report at CI, Will but did you realy think the Windies were that convincing? WI faltered at the start but so did Pakistan. I confess I missed a whole chunk of the middle of the game due to a late meeting, but still, the game was far from a classic and no promise of what is to come.
March 13th, 2007 at 10.49 pm
I disagree. We shouldn’t expect 300+ plus scores to dictate what is a good game and what isn’t. Ball dominated bat today, somewhat, and it’s refreshing. West Indies rallied after a mid-innings collapse that I feel proved to be the difference in the match.
What if they had have done what’s relatively normal for them and folded for 200 (from 6/183)? Pakistan were cruising at 3/99 at one point. But then the Windies fought back again in what I thought was a sterling bowling and fielding effort.
They earned the win in what I thought was a good game!
March 14th, 2007 at 3.14 am
Not a classic match, but a good one nevertheless. Loss scores tend to bring out ‘dog-fights’ as bowling becomes enthralling to watch, while batting becomes a real fight to keep your wicket intact - quite simply, the cricket I prefer.
March 14th, 2007 at 3.15 am
Not a classic match, but a good one nevertheless. Low scores tend to bring out ‘dog-fights’ as bowling becomes tight and in turn enthralling to watch, while batting becomes a real fight to keep your wicket intact - quite simply, the cricket I prefer.
March 14th, 2007 at 3.16 am
Argh, bloody browser… ^^
Comments
« Times World Cup supplement | Main | Do it for Sir Frank, West Indies »
