Quotehanger

  • "I think their minds were already on the plane home. I am just not sure they were here to play today."
    Jamie Siddons on Bangladesh's performance in the last league match of the Asia Cup

    Jul 4, 2008

  • Recent Posts

    Try DVD rental for £3.99 per month!

    The headlines



    Collingwood takes England to a famous victory

    By Scott last year, mid-February Leave a comment on this post

    A brilliant century by Paul Collingwood has powered England to a four wicket win over Australia at the MCG, chasing down Australia’s 252. Given that England were 3 for 15 when he came in, his coolness and poise is worthy of the highest praise.

    England have won three ODI games in a row. If a week is a long time in politics, it might be an even longer time on tour.

    Tags: , , , , |

    23 Responses to “Collingwood takes England to a famous victory”

  • Caro wrote:
    February 9th, 2007 at 11.35 am

    Apart from congratulating Collingwood, who almost deserves his MBE after all, (almost, because this is ODI, not Ashes, therefore less at stake)all I can say is the Oz selectors need their heads read for putting Watson into the final after not playing all summer. You’d think they’d have learnt not to make that mistake from the English!

    but yes, all hail , Collie! til sunday anyway. After all, a week in ODI’s may be long, but fans’ memories (and obviously selectors’) are short.

  • Galvo wrote:
    February 9th, 2007 at 11.36 am

    Yee Hah! It’s been a long uncomfortable summer here in Sydney. My Aussie mate has just set off home looking a bit glum. I’m off to the game on Sunday. I know it’s only a Mickey Mouse tournament but hell it feels good! Well done lads.

  • Kathy wrote:
    February 9th, 2007 at 11.53 am

    Collingwood… sigh… I could listen to that Geordie accent all day. Sorry, I mean watch him bat all day. Fabulous seesawing tight match — gives the fans their money’s worth.

  • Pamela wrote:
    February 9th, 2007 at 12.21 pm

    Well, hurrah, England have won another match!

    I just hope that this streak isn’t a fluke, and that the team really can win without Michael Vaughan. But Colly sure can make a difference!

    But for now, a beer!

  • Tom wrote:
    February 9th, 2007 at 1.04 pm

    I went along to the match, and was reasonably glad I did so despite the loss.

    The Australian collapse was hard to watch, but Collingwood’s batting more than made up for it. I’ve gone well past the point of caring about this tournament, and purely went along as an excuse to drink. Still, Collingwood’s innings was masterful and most importantly for the World Cup in a month, proved he can steer England home through a difficult part.

    I have quite a large headache so I really can’t be bothered going into any other details…oh, Mexican wave is probably worth a quick mention though.

    There was a plea to wear anything Mexican to the game tonight (I took a sombrero) in support of the Mexican Wave. Bay 13, notorious for their antics over the years, stood up every hour or so and did a ‘mass Mexican Wave’, i.e Everyone, rather than an individual began the wave. The police threw out a couple, but a large majority stayed as police couldn’t realistically remove 1000+ people.

    Rather amusing really.

  • marcus wrote:
    February 9th, 2007 at 1.46 pm

    Well, all those Collingwood naysayers can wipe the egg of their faces now!

    Just one other thing. I’m sure it’s just a coincidence, but did anyone else hear that Andrew Flintoff was using “Ring of Fire” as his intro song while bowling? Which begs the question of whether the English would have put up a better fight in the Tests if HOGGARD HADN’T FORGOTTEN THAT TAPE!

    Seriously, well done to England for enlivening the series and wiping that dumb smirk off Ponting’s face, just a little bit.

  • Justcoz wrote:
    February 9th, 2007 at 3.06 pm

    An amazing, professional performance from Collie. He never looked in trouble at the crease, and his fielding gave England the momentum it needed when it looked like the chase would be 350 and not 250.

    A quick word for Ian Bell though. He is beginning to look like a game changer at number 3. Soon he will be the batsman winning games; will be a pleasure to watch when that happens!

  • simply wondered wrote:
    February 9th, 2007 at 10.28 pm

    presumably as england are simply too crap to give the invincible australians a challenge (that was it, wasn’t it,mr buchanan you smug twat?)this match was lost deliberately by those who can do no wrong. even the formerly possessed-of-a-sense-of-perpsective punter - (except when run out by a pratt, of course)was remarkably keen to expose himself to hubris when he rubbished talk of an england recovery. australia may well win the next two matches and win them handsomely, but when you forget that the whole point of sport is that all results are possible, you really do give yourself a chance to look very very stupid. never disrespect your opponents (no matter how useless you think they are) because you’ll probably be there yourself soon enough. it’s a variant on the old one of not slagging someone off for dropping a sitter because it’ll be you doing it next - or glenn mcgrath - surely there is a god!

  • ugyen wrote:
    February 10th, 2007 at 1.32 am

    No Wonder Collingwood has show why he is key member of england cricket team… a memorable century for him and for all the england fans!!! great going for england!!

  • Caro wrote:
    February 10th, 2007 at 5.48 am

    simply wondered, if England turning up in Oz last November without even bothering to prepare properly, subjecting their faithful fans to weeks of debacle, isn’t the grossest disrepect for both the fans and the opponent, I dont’ know what is!

  • andrew schulz wrote:
    February 10th, 2007 at 9.34 am

    I think it might be a tad early to say that, Marcus. Still some egg-wiping and smirk-wiping to go over the next few days. Simply wondered: what Buchanan said was absolutely correct at the time. And Ponting’s was a fair assessment too. What would you prefer, mealy-mouthed patronising? And as for your allusion to swings and roundabouts and cycles- there hasn’t been much of it in Aust/England cricket for the last 20 years. Covered yourself well though, by saying Australia might win the next two handsomely. Can’t lose now, can you?

  • Caroline wrote:
    February 10th, 2007 at 11.53 am

    Come on Kathy - I’m in if you’re in:

    Marcus, you appear to have been held responsible for simply wondered comments, which incidentally, I think are spot on. And no Caro, the grossest disrepect for opponents I have ever seen are the repeated acceptance, or otherwise, speeches of Ponting, in which he manages to completely omit any reference to his opponents. In his self-centred little world nothing else seems to exist. Including chairmen of cricket boards who are trying to conduct their own presentation ceremonies as host nation . . . Have you been watching the same Ashes series? I saw English players try time and time again and play their hearts out in 40 degree heat, but the opposition was just too good.

    To take it away from us vs them, try Federer for a model of winning speeches. At least he doesn’t get embarrassed by continually winning, and doesn’t ignore the efforts of his opponents if he loses.

  • Graham E Smith wrote:
    February 10th, 2007 at 1.08 pm

    Dear Caroline,…..Would I be correct in my assumption that you are a member of the Diplomatic Core?
    I have never read such beautifully crafted letter in relation to a sport…..well done lass,long may you continue….my sentiments exactly.
    Well done England…..now please remember how you did it on Sunday….and for the opening batsmen who failed yet again!There’s still time to have a lesson in pure guts from Collingwood……after all you should know the technicalities of Batting after all the hours you’ve put in at the nets?

  • Caroline wrote:
    February 10th, 2007 at 1.53 pm

    Wow, thanks Graham . . . I was beginning to think I was on a little planet of my own for a while there. Probably not been described as ‘diplomatic’ before, either . . . Although I did misread Simply Wondered’s name as part of the text there in Andrew’s post. Oh well: what you get for jumping in boots an’ all!

    Let’s hope tomorrow brings some more joy for the boys (and for us, of course). I think Vaughan must be going to miss some of the match, at least, as I believe he will be on a plane home? Such a pity when he has probably been one of the main catalysts. However, I believe there is no reason why Flintoff can’t carry on the good work in the short term, as he showed yesterday.

  • simply wondered wrote:
    February 10th, 2007 at 8.14 pm

    Caro - we are perhaps in danger of over-stressing australia’s importance.
    you really think the england management sat around and thought ‘well chaps - it’s an away fixture against the best side in the world who are desperate to whip our miserable arses after last summer. i say, here’s a cunning plan: let’s show just how little we respect them by not preparing. we may get thrashed, but they’ll be so angry!’
    murmurs of agreement round the room.
    up pipes PR guru: ‘yes it would also piss off our fanatical supporters (’the mad army’, i think they’re called) who will have spent buckets of dosh going half way across the world.’
    …well it’s certainly an ‘interesting’ theory (just for the record that’s ‘mealy-mouthed patronising’).

    no, they ballsed it up; they got the wrong schedule, they had to make some gambles on fitness - all of which were proved wrong, they stupidly lost the services of a really good bowling coach. but amazing as it may seem, the world does not revolve around australia. it might be more attractive for me to think they did this out of bloody-mindedness and not because they fucked up big time, but the simplest explanation is usually the right one.
    we prepared badly, we probably believed our own ridiculous pr (open-top buses full of hung-over cricketers? tea at the palace? oh please!!! another excellent example of hubris)and lacked the hunger of an angry bunch of aussies many of whom knew this was the last hurrah and were fucked if they were going to let the colonial power lord it over them. particularly given the fact that of the two squads in australia, the australians had at least a small edge at virtually every position.
    however, for me, the buchanan comment had all the charm and maturity of pointing a dismissed batsman at the pavilion - just a bit cheap. if a player on my own team did it, i’d tell him he was a twat, too.

    andrew - yes, saying ‘anything could happen and it probably will’ (as i think jack karnham did) is something of a trueism and a long odds-on bet, but if i say that sport is a glorious uncertainty (blah blah blah etc)and then add a prediction that england will win 2-0, that isn’t exactly consistent. for what it’s worth, i think the aussies will either win 2-1 or england 2-0. i just don’t think english morale is strong enough to win a nail-biter. they really have been the poorest side of the tourney and i can’t quite work out how they got to the final (mind you i REALLY can’t work out what loye and nixon are doing there, estimable county pros though they are; still, both have been right up for the fight - nixon not worthy to ask punter for batting tips let alone sledge him - punter probably cracked a rib). this will not stop me laughing long and hard if england pickpocket the win - as the aussies would if in some weird world the positions were reversed. for what it’s worth i think it’s more about aussie weakness than english quality and other sides may have more chance in the world cup than we thought. and here was me kicking myself for not taking some of the generous odds on england going home without winning a game in oz…it’s a funny old game, andrew.

  • Caro wrote:
    February 11th, 2007 at 12.04 am

    Gee, Caroline! I don’t think we were watching the same Ashes. Which planet are you on again? Your players playing their hearts out in 40C heat? I’ll get out my violin. The Aussies were in air conditioned lounges, were they? . As for Ponting never mentioning the opposition, I think you must have auto-delete on anything complimentary he says. Perhaps I have it too, when listening to Flintoff, who as I recall, never took responsibility all tour for England playing so badly and never said sorry to his fans for their poor showing. It took Vaughan to finallly come out and say that. English fans who were actually here, the ones I sat with in pubs or chatted to on buses were either very depressed or absolutely ropeable at Flintoff’s media comments and the team’s performance.

    Having said that, charm is not Ponting’s strong point and I always feel disappointed in him when he fronts the media. He, and most other captains’ could do well to follow Stephen Fleming’s example as to how a real leader speaks and acts. Certainly Flintoff is a most generous person and I love him for that gesture of his alone towards Langer at his final Test appearance, but Australians generally value honesty and directness above diplomacy and pussy-footing around.

    I’m won’t bother answering simplywondered’s rant as he’s obviously an aussiephobe and it’s water off a duck’s back.

  • Graham E Smith wrote:
    February 11th, 2007 at 1.38 am

    I never thought that I would live to see cricket generating so much heat…Woweee!
    Roar on the next match……I love it!

  • Caroline wrote:
    February 11th, 2007 at 2.37 am

    Actually Caro, nine of them were in the airconditioned dressing room on the day I went, because they were batting . . . But seriously, I agree with you about Fleming’s presentation as a Captain, and Vaughan definitely outstrips dear Fred. But then, he’s just dear old Fred, isn’t he? I don’t expect too much from him other than on the field. Yes, I do have a bias as far as Ponting and many other things go - there is definitely a pervasive filtering effect on any info which comes into my brain cricket-related. Most of it comes out spelling v-a-u-g-h-a-n!

    I just don’t think the players should be that responsible to the fans. As an follower of the England team, I choose to support them whether they play well or poorly. I don’t feel they owe me much - some level of turning up and putting in, but if I don’t like it, I can choose not to follow them anymore. I haven’t felt particularly let down by them. They don’t play for my sake, but for their country, representing that and themselves. Did that make sense to anyone?

  • Kathy wrote:
    February 11th, 2007 at 5.25 am

    I don’t mind Ponting — he’s certainly a no-frills Aussie with few pretensions, and clearly a brilliant batsman. I don’t really rate him as a captain though — with a team of the calibre of Australia over the last few years, Chris Cairns’ mother could have captained them just as well, as Cairns put it himself a few years back.

    And I don’t really mind what Ponting and Buchanan say either — captains and coaches sound smug and arrogant when they’re winning and like shifty dolts when they’re losing — just listen to Ponting and Buchanan in the 2005 Ashes: they don’t sound any sharper than Flintoff and Fletcher have on this tour. What can you say when you’re losing?

    I certainly think it’s damned easy to be a fan of a team when they’re winning. It’s when they’re losing, and losing badly, that it takes grit and shows you what you’re made of. Some fans go ballistic and want inquiries and heads to roll and spew out a lot of anger. And yeah, England made mistakes and took gambles with selection and fitness in the recent Ashes. But every team does that. And sometimes they come off spectacularly well. There was great debate about whether to choose Pietersen for the 05 Ashes. Seems hard to countenance now, but there was. But England had a terrible year last year, four captains, multiple injuries which meant they had to rebuild their team again and again with young inexperienced players. And everything went wrong in Australia, and it was bloody hard to watch. But form and confidence and success are mysterious things and not at all things that you can conjure up by firing people and having inquiries and spewing a lot of hot air. I was intrigued to hear Collingwood say the other day that his dramatic reversal of form was due to nothing that he could pinpoint. He said the only thing he did differently was change the grip on his bat. And I’m sure Australia have felt they’ve gone out with exactly the same intent in their last two games with England, yet lost.

    And Caro, as far as Aussiephobes go, maybe you should look at the tone of your own comments over the last couple of days before you start casting stones.

  • Caro wrote:
    February 11th, 2007 at 5.47 am

    Yes, Kathy, ” I love Flintoff” is very anglophobe, I agree. And feeling sorry for poor old Strauss go out for 6 again is very anglophobe, too. Strauss’s tour from hell.
    Haven’t heard you say anything positive about Aussie players, you just “tolerate” them. Good of you! And now you’re waffling about the grit needed to be an English fan! I think it takes a bit more grit to be Strauss!

  • Caroline wrote:
    February 11th, 2007 at 7.47 am

    What is this - a target on Kathy or what? Fair enough you like Flintoff, Caro, but what red-blooded female doesn’t?. That’s no challenge at all! I think it is the comments about the MBE’s which alerts us to the Anglophobe (capital letter thanks!) part of you. Don’t worry, I’m a confessed Aussiephobe, but only for those who piss me off with their pommie-bashing.

    Let’s agree to disagree, and not get so personal, hey? Anyway, what are we all doing on this thread- let’s talk about the game on the other one!

  • Caro wrote:
    February 11th, 2007 at 8.09 am

    I meant that in a complimentary way about the MBE! I think Collie’s been great! Gee, I think you lot just don’t have a sense of ironic humour. My Scottish surname means wrymouth.

  • simply wondered wrote:
    February 11th, 2007 at 9.34 am

    simplywondered…’s obviously an aussiephobe

    *preens* you’re too kind, caro and i’m delighted to be of service; i hope that by studying your even-handed comments i may soon be as impartial as you
    xxx

  • Comments

    Receive email updates on new comments


    « Who makes these rules, and why do we put up with them? | Main | England can smash and grab a trophy today »