Quotehanger

  • "The fact is that once I was playing again I was automatically available for everything on the schedule and that meant Stanford. I make no apologies for that and, as for the suggestion that I should waive the fee or give it to charity, I don't see why I should be a special case."
    Steve Harmison feels strongly about suggestions that he came out of one-day retirement in order to play the Stanford Twenty20 for 20

    Sep 7, 2008

    • Recent Posts

    Try DVD rental for £3.99 per month!

    The headlines

    The news

    TWC



    England vs New Zealand, and I’m not going

    By Scott last year, at the end of January Leave a comment on this post

    The New Zealanders are bringing back Jacob Oram and Kyle Mills. But Shane Bond isn’t yet fit. With the greatest respect to Oram and Mills, I’m not shelling out money to watch them.

    Anyway, chat away yonder, my merry readers. An England victory here would be a great leap forward towards them making the finals.

    UPDATE - Oh, Bond’s been included. New Zealand are batting first, so I might wander along after all.

    Tags: , , , , , |

    3 Responses to “England vs New Zealand, and I’m not going”

  • Allie wrote:
    January 23rd, 2007 at 10.27 am

    120 all out. So much for the great leap forward.

  • Scott wrote:
    January 23rd, 2007 at 11.25 am

    I did go, and it was a great leap forward, alright.. for New Zealand.

  • Graham E Smith wrote:
    January 23rd, 2007 at 2.18 pm

    I was listening to the match commentary ,in my bed…luckily I fell asleep when NZ reached 200…so I did not have to endure the pain of yet another England collapse……I will not be watching the replay on the box tonight……..Why,oh,why…. don’t they all come home now?……And spend the saved money on Australian coaches for our Junior cricket schemes!

    • Comments

    Receive email updates on new comments


    « Kiwis rue their lost opportunities | Main | Egad, an Englishman coaching England? I’ve a better idea »