Love sport? Try betting on your favourite team and win!

 


Twitter

 

Recent Posts

Cricket news



Fantasy Cricket

Cricket’s coming home!

By Scott 4 years ago, mid-December Add your comment below

Ahhh, Victory!

To be honest, 3-0 after 3 is no reflection of the tightness of the contests, or the gap between the teams. I have a lot of respect for the power of this English team, and especially its batting potential. Even this morning I pondered the odds of an English victory, because in my view, Pietersen is good enough a batsman to orchestrate it. He just needed someone to stay there at the other end. He was unbeaten at the end as well.

How much harder Australia would have had to work if Hoggard, a tough defensive batsman, had been able to hold an end up with him, I leave to your imagination.

But how do I feel? This picture sums up my feelings. I’m having a Bundy Rum and coke, and lapping it up!

The Ashes at the Herald on Sunday
(Via Tony the Teacher)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , |

17 Responses to “Cricket’s coming home!”

  • Tony.T wrote:
    December 18th, 2006 at 11.04 am

    KP is a gun, a lot better than I initially thought, but when batting with tail enders he needs to sharpen up his act. For one thing, he must farm the strike better. Certainly he should stop hitting singles off the first ball of the over. The cause may well have been lost, but I’m getting a faint whiff of “playing for red ink”.

    Hussey’s the go-to guy here. Pietersen should have a look at how Shameless goes about batting with bunnies.

  • Caroline wrote:
    December 18th, 2006 at 11.47 am

    On ya Scott! Hope you enjoy it. Love the pic . . .

  • Alan de Bristol wrote:
    December 18th, 2006 at 4.37 pm

    Congratulations to Australia!

    I don’t think it’s going to take 17 years to get them back though…

  • Justcoz wrote:
    December 18th, 2006 at 5.48 pm

    Congrats Australia: I agree that the matches have been closer than 3-0, but the convicts deserve it:

    So… five reason why England lost

    1) No Simon Jones – the real leader of the attack
    2) No Michael Vaughan – we missed his Sheffield steel
    3) Too much respect for the old guard (Geraint Jones and Ashley Giles)
    4) Poor mental preparation (Harmison, Jones)
    5) Too many dodgy decisions cut down the top order… In each innings at least one top order wicket went on the conn… Compared to just McGrath for England in T3.

    But five reasons for England to be hopeful for the future

    1) The best young batting class in world cricket… Cook, Bell, Pietersen will only learn and grow from the experience
    2) Monty – a real match-winning spinner – and new talisman
    3) Hoggard has become a threat in any circumstances
    4) The Flintoff captaincy experiment will come to an end
    5) Harmison may learn from the experience… and finally grow up.

    And five reasons for Australia to worry a bit

    1) Goodbye Langer, Hayden, Gilchrist, Warne, McGrath
    2) Brett Lee – pace may not be everything
    3) The all-rounder question is still open
    4) Now England will be motivated to respond again!
    5) And hopefully England will never again show up to an Ashes eo poorly prepared.

    At least the remaining tests will be interesting!

  • Tony.T wrote:
    December 18th, 2006 at 7.46 pm

    By the way, that picture’s alternate text “The Ashes at the Herald on Sunday” is ever so slightly misleading.

    You’ve got to read the BIG print.

  • England11 wrote:
    December 18th, 2006 at 8.50 pm

    we lost for several reasons, mostly centered around the fact they outplayed us but I hold massive hopes for next time. A lot of the aussies I’ve spoken to seem to think they can dominate us again and looking into my crystal ball, I just can’t see it.

    I agree with Justcoz, another couple of years, sprinkling of confidence and the young England team are going to be formidable. Cook, Bell, Pietersen, Jones, Monty the old(er) pros that will be Freddy and Strauss are making me salivate with excitment already. Those that were off form and ill prepared were just that, they didn’t suddenly become rubbish in 18 months.

    Just need the right guy in the gloves and we’re good to go. Sad to get excited about the next Ashes I know but I can’t help but wonder if they’re so excited about this one because it could be the end of a cricket era?

  • amused wrote:
    December 19th, 2006 at 12.05 am

    And five reasons for Australia to worry a bit

    1) Goodbye Langer, Hayden, Gilchrist, Warne, McGrath

    Hello Johnson, Bracken, Tait, Voges, Cosgorve, Jacques oh and of course Michael Hussey has a younger brother

    2) Brett Lee – pace may not be everything

    One bad series does not an Englishman make. He’ll bounce back.

    3) The all-rounder question is still open

    We don’t need one. Our bowlers can pile runs on better than your middle order.

    4) Now England will be motivated to respond again!

    We endured 16 years of English ‘motivation’ you folded after 15 months.

    5) And hopefully England will never again show up to an Ashes eo poorly prepared.

    I’ll have to agree with that one.

  • Caroline wrote:
    December 19th, 2006 at 1.22 am

    So if we get them back in less than 17 years this time, we can say that we’re on the up and up?

    Justcoz – I like your thinking. That’s my consolation too.

  • Bilbo wrote:
    December 19th, 2006 at 5.34 am

    Well I didn’t come here to gloat. There’s no need. We have the Ashes and I have a Tee-shirt, a black one, with the words “Five – NIL” printed in big white letters. I’ll wear it with pride. I’m happy with both.

    What we all seem to have lost sight of in this series is that England really did nothing wrong except come to Australia with a roughly average Test team prepared to play Test Cricket.

    What they didn’t realise was that they were about to be ambushed. The Australian Team that lost The Ashes went to ground after that defeat in England. Many ideas, theories, suggestions were bandied around, but basically it was “Danger Men at Work”. They trained, they practised, they dissected each English players strengths and weaknesses,,,,,,,,,and then waited in deep bush for the passing victims. All this happened in secrecy. There was never a whisper in any “Oz” newspapers let alone abroad.

    Only those of us with a nose to the air in “Oz” had an inkling of what was about to happen. We said nothing. Loose Lips Sink Ships.

    Add into this mix, a good dose of wounded pride, a hefty dollop of revenge and a whisp of good fortune.

    The English Team arrived here thinking this was going to be a turkey shoot. It was indeed a turkey shoot. The English Team were the turkeys.

    England you have a lot to be proud of. Your players served you well. Some were heroes. Some weren’t. But Australia had this in the bag before the English Team got on the plane to Australia.

    What’s left of still wrigglng body of English Cricket will be decapitated in the next 2 remaining Test Matches.

    As the Barmy Army would chant,,,,,,,,,

    “Ding dong”

    “Ding dong”

    “Five nil”

    “Five nil”

    To the supporters of English Cricket I’d advise not to distress yourselves about this loss, don’t look to blame your team or it’s management. This defeat was simply unavoidable. There is more to cricket than individuals. Cricket is a game just like life. It needs deep thought, comittiment, a gambler’ nerves, a dedicated team effort and a belief in yourself, the nerve to back yourself to win. Australia had these qualities in spades. England had it, but not in spades. You had individuals and you banked on individuals. That’s dangerous. Australia had it in spades. That’s arrogance. Sometimes, the good guy doesn’t win.

    Please pass on my sympathies to the following English players:

    Flintoff

    Hoggard

    Collingwood

    Strauss

    Panesar

    And the next Captain of England, a talented batsman, a leader, a perfomer under real pressure – Cook.

    For they are the true heroes of English Cricket today.

    Bilbo

  • Tassiedevil wrote:
    December 19th, 2006 at 12.40 pm

    Well done England.
    Remember, it matters not who lost or won,
    but how you played the game…
    If I may be so bold, I have been giving some thought to the relative youth of the English team and would like to offer a suggestion.
    Why don’t you scour the retirement villages for ex players who can still go a bit and slip them into the current team. Play the Aussies at their own game as it were…. just a thought.
    Anyway, have a very merry Christmas. I know I will.

    Cheers,

    JQ.

  • Bilbo wrote:
    December 19th, 2006 at 2.13 pm

    I’ve just been reading again and again the comments posted by “Justcoz” at 5.48pm.

    “Just”, You’ve left out a whole paragraph of why you were beaten and will continue to be beaten.

    You never made one mention of a superior, united TEAM of cricketers, Not once. But the truth is there for all to see – if they want to see it. Cricket is after all a team game.

    The English Cricket Team has been torn apart by internal division that resulted in an uncohesive mob of individuals – talented, yes, but not all on the same page of the hymn book. Fletcher saw to that. Divide and conquer and get your own way – the Fletcher family motto.

    As for our future, you’ve looked at the obverse side of the coin. Our future for bowling is assured with the likes of Stuart Clarke -leading wicket taker for the series, young enough to continue and he actually “OutMcGrathed McGrath” His accuracy was laser like – consistently. Prior to this series, Clarke was regarded as a run of the mill State league bowler playing in New South Wales – nothing really special and yet he creamed the cream of Englands batsmen. There are more where he came from, all playing in State Cricket. All young and a bit raw, but we’ve got 3 years,,,,,,,

    Batting? Michael Clarke, Mike Hussey (who has a younger brother, David, just like him playing in State Cricket), Voges will be tried out in the next test at the expense of one the best one day players in the world – Andrew “Roy” Simons. “Roy” just doesn’t have the temperament for Test cricket.

    The biggest problem for Australian selectors will be who to leave out. That’s why Hussey couldn’t get a game until now. Hussey has been flailing runs in State Cricket for years. But who were we going to drop so that he could have a hit?

    We are not in the least bit concerned because by 2009 you will have only just recovered from the bloodbath that will shape English Cricket when “Fletchers Failures” are held to account back in England.

    Remember, this vendetta of Ricky Ponting’s has only just begun. It has 2 more Tests and several one day games to run yet. Your only chance is that “Warney” doesn’t play one day games.

    Ponting’s anger knows no bounds. The humiliation will continue.

    Bilbo

  • England11 wrote:
    December 19th, 2006 at 9.43 pm

    Tassiedevil, i am going to roughly translate that as you think Alec Stewart should keep wicket again……and I agree.

  • Woodyway wrote:
    December 20th, 2006 at 7.51 am

    Blimey! Bilbo thinks cricket is just like life.I remember someone being severely chastised for saying cricket is a mircocosm of life,but he does overdo it a bit.

    ‘One swallow does not make a summer’ and one keeper does not make a team.
    Off to work!Sigh.

  • Tassiedevil wrote:
    December 20th, 2006 at 7.57 am

    Hello there England 11,

    No, I was thinking more along the lines of Dr W G Grace.
    Now there was a player in his day. Is he still around?

    Cheers JQ.

  • Sean wrote:
    December 20th, 2006 at 9.23 am

    Just want to say well done to the Aussies – England were outplayed in the key areas of the game, simple as that. Before the series started I thought Aus would win 3-1 (although to be fair I thought that last time too) but as soon as Adelaide happened 5-0 was odds on; you just don’t come back from that sort of mental scarring.

    I don’t buy into the dodgy decisions, Justcoz. Look at the number of shockers Martyn and Katich had last time round; what goes around comes around IMO although Strauss does appear to be the chief victim this time round.

    Well done Aussies you make a pretty decent side look very ordinary indeed. I just hope we come back from our beating as positively as you did yours.

  • jon wrote:
    December 20th, 2006 at 12.00 pm

    Well done to the Aussies – they were prepared for the series and it showed.
    As for England – there were a few bright spots but not many. We have talented players, but 4 or 5 talented players ain’t enough. Cricket is a team game and the team as a whole wasn’t good enough. England were severely weakened without Vaughan.
    To play Giles in Aus was the biggest mistake they could have made. The Aus tracks were bound to turn. With arguably the greatest cricketer ever to live in Warne playing in their team the Aussies would have stupid beyond belief to not produce turning tracks.
    England were unprepared and picked the wrong team – two combinations that simply cannot work at that level of cricket.

  • George Patterson wrote:
    January 4th, 2007 at 11.01 pm

    Ref.Justcoz comments Dec.18th. Would you please cease your references to [English] convicts. surely our orginal
    pioners are worthy of much kinder consideration. Their compulsoy presence in Australia. illustrated the predudices of the British Legal System of the time. Your comments indicate the expression of ‘Ridicule’ remains ‘Alive and Well’in the ‘Land of Mixed Content’.
    What ‘Strangeways’ you have!

  • Comments

     


    Receive email updates on new comments


    « | Main | »