Quotehanger

  • "The fact is that once I was playing again I was automatically available for everything on the schedule and that meant Stanford. I make no apologies for that and, as for the suggestion that I should waive the fee or give it to charity, I don't see why I should be a special case."
    Steve Harmison feels strongly about suggestions that he came out of one-day retirement in order to play the Stanford Twenty20 for 20

    Sep 7, 2008

  • Recent Posts

    Try DVD rental for £3.99 per month!

    The headlines

    The news

    TWC



    Monty’s two-finger salute

    By Will 2 years ago, mid-December Leave a comment on this post

    It’s been as emphatic a two-finger salute to Duncan Fletcher as he could have produced; a five-wicket haul, enthusiastic fielding and a classy cameo at No.11. Monty Panesar hasn’t put a foot wrong and has made Fletcher look even more stubborn, righteous and pig-headed than we already suspected.

    And his time is nigh. This is it for Fletcher. Only he will reason why he chose to alter a winning attack for the first Test at Brisbane, trying blindly to resurrect the dream of Ashes 2005. But come January the call for his head will ring louder than the Barmy Army’s bugler, and so it should. For all his outstanding work during his tenure, his copybook has been spectacularly blotted. Sadly, for he really did help engineer a change in attitude in English cricket (for the better), he is now a millstone around England’s neck.

    Before this series, any decision he made was justified by the media. Nasser Hussain, in particular, has always been quick to defend Fletcher’s selections while describing him as a coach who rarely, if ever, makes the wrong choice. When Monty on-drove Stuart Clark for four, straight back past the bowler, during a vital last-wicket hurrah with Steve Harmison, there were quizzical looks from the Australian fielders. Who is this bearded wonder? It was as classy an on-drive as any left-hander could have dreamed for. And another nail in Fletcher’s coffin.

    Tags: , , , , , , , |

    17 Responses to “Monty’s two-finger salute”

  • Jon wrote:
    December 15th, 2006 at 9.04 pm

    I think he will leave after the World Cup, but it doesn’t make sense for him to go beforehand. I’d like Bob Woolmer to take the job, but I think it’ll be Peter Moores.

    It is easy to forget the state English cricket was in when Duncan took over- losing to New Zealand and ranking almost last in the world. England are a far better team now and that’s what makes this Ashes debacle so hard to take. It’s a shame, since with the likes of Panesar, Broad, Cook (he’ll get over this blip) and Bell and the more established players in what is still a young side, the future is a bright one.

    A lot of the qualities which Fletcher has and that helped England climb out of the mess they were in, are the ones holding them back now.

  • Patrick Kidd wrote:
    December 15th, 2006 at 9.52 pm

    There are many reasons why England have not been competitive, not least the skill and determination of the Australians. England’s biggest mistake, bigger even than leaving out Monty, is the lack of preparation time they allowed before and during the series.

    They should never have flown home to be with their families after the Champions Trophy, particularly as it appears that half the team had their families fly out to Australia for the start of the tour (which they could do as long as it was at their own expense) while the rest of the spouses have come out after the second Test.

    Instead, we should have had two proper first-class warm-ups before the first Test so we could tell who was fit and in form. Even if you think Giles is a better player than Panesar, it was a hell of a risk to pick him on the back of a two-day hit and giggle.

    There should also have been a four-day game between the second and third Test instead of the Lilac Hill one-dayer and the two-day WA match. People like Flintoff and Bell desperately needed batting practice, but instead we gave an innings to Joyce and Vaughan, and the latter didn’t even bat.

    Good teams take time to come to the boil, it was extreme arrogance to think we could just rock up and retain the Ashes. Bad preparation is not really Fletcher’s fault, but surely he wields enough power to insist that his team should have the best of chances. It is just so horridly reminiscent of why Clive Woodward left the RFU after winning the World Cup. He could see that England could only get worse.

  • Will wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 12.17 am

    Spot on Patrick. The lack of warm-ups, though, is one thing Fletcher (I presume) doesn’t have much, if any, control over.

    I don’t know if boards such as the ECB can fight/decline the schedule laid out to them by the ICC. I suspect not. But I cannot see how much longer teams can continue to arrive in foreign parts with scant time for warm-ups. I wrote about Harmison’s plight at Brisbane, and the lack of preparation he had before this series. My editor in India called it naive, and pointed out that it wasn’t just England who are affected by the crammed schedule. Valid point…but if everyone’s in the same boat, it doesn’t make the situation any better, or right.

    It’s a major problem and I’m equally unsure why it isn’t discussed/attacked more. Cricket is seasonless these days; they merge into one another with no space to breath.

    So that’s one aspect we can’t blame Fletcher for. And to jump to his defence briefly, the crammed schedule has clearly affected his judgement in selections. I’m convinced the reason he doesn’t pick certain players for warm-ups (and protects them from playing *any* county cricket) is the fear of picking up injuries. Nasser Hussain once pointed out that Fletcher (and coaches per se) *have* to look three, four years ahead all the time. So, perhaps in Fletcher’s eyes, a warm-up is little more than a banana skin. Flawed thinking or indicative of modern times?

    I’m waffling again. Time to go to work, then.

  • Patrick Kidd wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 1.01 am

    You’re not naive, Will. Practice times may be restricted for everyone (although Australia seemed to have plenty of county matches last time they were here) but the trouble with England is that they had so many injuries and no way of gauging if the players were fit to be thrust into the Test side.

    We know that Harmison and Giles can be terrible on occasion even when fully fit, but might their poor form on this tour (especially Harmison) be due to a lack of match practice? Perhaps we should refuse to tire out players by sending elite teams to things like the Champions Trophy and Twenty20 World Cup.

  • Bilbo wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 2.40 am

    You lot really make me laugh. Every time YOUR countries sportsmen even looks like failing then you start devouring your own team. Show some spine and back ‘em up. Typically English I suppose,,,,,

    Ricky lost The Ashes for us - but he’s still there.

    Mind you, it’s delightful watching you lot imploding and eating each other.

    Bilbo

  • Will wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 3.56 am

    I guess it’s a whole mix of problems: injuries, no practice, poor selections and Australia have simply played a lot better. As for the Champions Trophy, well…

    Bilbo: honest dissection of your own team’s failings is wrong, is it? And it’s “country’s”, not “countries” - although I suppose you’ll blame Britain’s education system for your failing grammar, too.

  • Kathy wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 4.02 am

    For once, Bilbo, I agree with you. England are vicious to their own. I think the last thing England should do is sack Fletcher.

    However, you can’t deny there were people calling for Ponting’s and Buchanan’s heads last year. And fair play to Australia for sticking with them, despite Warne trying to undermine Buchanan at every turn.

  • Bilbo wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 4.06 am

    Will,

    I knew somebody would fall for it. Gawd you lot are so predictable. You were sucked in a BEAUTY mate,,,,,,,

    “Countries” is correct in this context.

    England,,,,,,South Africa,,,,,,,,Australia (yes - you had an Australian Bowling coach when you won The Ashes)

    Oh dear,,,,,

    Bilbo

  • Bilbo wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 4.10 am

    Will,

    43 years ago,,,,,,,,,,98% in GCE English Language “O”Level.

    42 years ago,,,,,,,,,,,,89% in GCE “A” level English

    I couldn’t go to university. Family was broke. Had to get a job. Ended up as truck mechanic!! The money was good.

    As I said before, Will my youth was wasted in the UK.

    Next patient nurse!

    Bilbo

  • marcus wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 9.36 am

    Bilbo

    “Country’s”, as in one (singular) country. “Countries(’)” is a plural for “country”, i.e there is more than one. In this case, one country, therefore “country’s.” And I’ve been raised on the Australian system.

  • Bilbo wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 12.20 pm

    Marcus,

    We could talk all night about which “rys” and which “ries” of which “Count” it was ;) Thiiinkkk Abouuutt it before you say any more!

    But I think you’ll find I was correct when I used the plural version. Or have you missed the point entirely?

    I’ll explain - England’s Cricket team is not entirely English is it? Hence the plural version is correct.

    Bilbo

  • Caroline wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 12.59 pm

    Bilbo, even if you consider the England team to be made up of players from several countries, you missed the apostrophe. May I be the first to say, “Sod off you arrogant lout”. And Will, I fully support your frustration over this loser . . . even if you are too much of a gentleman to say it.

    I was always taught it is poor manners to flout your ‘qualifications’, too.

  • Caroline wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 1.06 pm

    Sorry if this post comes through twice - seem to have lost it in the process (my temper as well . . . )

    Bilbo, regardless of whether you consider the members of the England team to have come from one or from many countries, you still missed the apostrophe. Where do you get off being so offensive?

    Will, behind you 100% in your frustration, even if you are too much of a gentleman to say it.

    ps. In case you didn’t know, as you obviously had a poor,hard-done-by time at the hands of the English education system, Bilbo, it is poor form to flout your ‘qualifications’.

  • Caroline wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 1.31 pm

    Dammit! I knew that would happen. Is it too weak to blame the laptop?

  • marcus wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 1.54 pm

    Bilbo

    You do realise that Symonds was born in the West Indies and raised in England, right? No matter- if you were talking about the plural “countries” you should still in this context put an apostraphe after it.

  • Bilbo wrote:
    December 16th, 2006 at 10.03 pm

    Ladies and Gentlemen,

    Caroline - I get off being so offensive when the mod of this forum apolgises for the most offensive remark you can make to a person that emigrated - divided loyalties, loyalties of convenience, THAT is VERY offensive to me. In Australia, it represents the ultimate insult.

    All this acrimony was started by the moderator of this forum who called me an “Australian of Opportunity”, a person that chose to be on the winning side only out of convenience. Prior to that point, I came on here for a bit of friendly banter. But it seems the English can give it out but can’t take it when the going gets tough.

    Your team have done you proud against a superior force. That WACA ground is one hell of a hot place when the weather is the way it is right now. I’ve been there amny times in the past. (I stopped going when the Australian Lager Louts were pissing on peoples lunches - true story)I’m not surprised that Hoggard collapsed. There were many at the WACA that were shipped to the ambulance yesterday and they were in the crowd, not out in that stinking hot hell hole. But I wander a bit,,,,,,,,

    Your team are doing thier best and except for a valiant few here, you’ve pilloried them for trying thier guts out. Freddie must be heartbroken and I really feel for him, Hoggy, Monty, Collingwood - the ones that are trying. I’m entitled to attack your team. I’m the opposition. But you are bigger traitors than I’ll EVER be.

    In typical English fashion you’ve not seen the funny side of “my qualification’s”. They are pathetic - 2 GCE’s !! My math’s are abominable! As is my punctuation. You just don’t get it do ya. It’s all a bit to subtle for a nation that not only wants to attack its opposition but also its own team. That’s all you ever see. That’s all the English have ever done - drag everything down if it looks like getting above its station in life. The English Class System is alive and well. Perhaps poor Freddie was put up as Captain for this trip because The English Establishment knew that England would not be able to retain the Ashes. You see, Freddie is a Lancashire Lad. We couldn’t have Michael copping the blame for losing the Ashes could we? So, I suggest collective, nationwide surgery, an oprectomy. That’s the operation that cuts the nerve that runs from your eyes to your sphincter. It stops you having a shitty outlook on life.

    Your team deserves better than you lot and we’d take half of ‘em tommorrow as Australians. Why? WE love ‘em because they’re trying. They’re giving 110% of all they’ve got. They’re not sitting around moping, slashing thier wrists, renting clothes and gnashing teeth sitting in an English living room. They’re out here getting pasted just so you can abuse ‘em. It’s just a shame they’re getting hammered. The Barmy Army aren’t knocking ‘em.

    Yes I knew Symonds was English/West Indian. Like me he chose Australia over England and somehow you can’t forgive us can you.

    Today could be the day. I hope not. Your lads deserve something to hope for. There’s not much to come home to is there? There never was.

    Bilbo

  • Caroline wrote:
    December 17th, 2006 at 12.16 am

    Ah, hilarious rant Bilbo! Keep it up buddy . . . Let’s see if you can get even more repetitive and less succinct in your ramblings.


  • « Super jacket, that | Main | Hoggard’s 5th video diary from Australia »