Quotehanger

  • I think those speed guns are a load of crap. Somehow the white ball goes faster - I bowled 83-84mph in the Test match, and 93mph in the one-dayers. It's crazy. I hadn't bowled a ball for ten days.
    Steve Harmison has his doubts about the pace at which he's been bowling

    Aug 28, 2008

  • Recent Posts

    Try DVD rental for £3.99 per month!

    The headlines

    The news

    TWC



    A rift through the English team?

    By Scott 2 years ago, at the start of December Leave a comment on this post

    This can not be a positive for England:

    A MAJOR internal rift is brewing in the England camp following the revelation that coach Duncan Fletcher has been wrongly blamed for snubbing spin bowling cult hero Monty Panesar.

    Fletcher is privately fuming at being held accountable for omitting Panesar from the Adelaide Test, a match where England’s No.1 spinner Ashley Giles took just 2-149 to leave his career hanging by a thread.

    The Courier-Mail has learned that at team selection meetings in Adelaide, Fletcher leaned toward Panesar to play in the Test but captain Andrew Flintoff went for his Lancashire teammate, swing bowler Jimmy Anderson, who went on to perform poorly and may not play another Test on tour.

    Flintoff won out after the issue was discussed by a committee of senior players including Geraint Jones and Andrew Strauss.

    The fallout over the omission of Panesar has become so great in England that it is threatening to undermine Fletcher’s future as England coach and also drive a wedge between Fletcher and Flintoff.

    It is remarkable England performed as well as they did in the Second Test given this dispute, and it is hard to imagine what the mood is like in the English camp now. These relevations make things work; the British media will be on to them like a pack of dogs on a three legged cat.

    Tags: , , , , , , |

    22 Responses to “A rift through the English team?”

  • Chris wrote:
    December 7th, 2006 at 3.09 pm

    This would explain Fletcher’s comments after the defeat, he seemed keen that the media know that others (in particular Flintoff) were involved in the selection. It seemed out of character at the time.

    You do have to keep wondering why Jones is one of the inner circle. The guy hasn’t even got a central contract. Looks like the ‘yes men’ are beginning to turn on their leader!

  • india_fan wrote:
    December 7th, 2006 at 4.43 pm

    This does bring up yet another question about Flintoff’s captaincy; can he really act against his nice guy image to make the difficult choices?

  • ty wrote:
    December 7th, 2006 at 6.50 pm

    well surely duncan had the final say on selection… he must have gone along with it

  • Kathy wrote:
    December 7th, 2006 at 6.52 pm

    Very interesting and perplexing. Does Freddie not rate Monty? Or was it a pitch thing?

    I think the “yes men” tag is a bit bitchy. I would say Jones is in the inner circle because of his age, his experience with the team and his knowledge, being the wicketkeeper, of how pitches and bowlers are performing.

    Did Fletcher back Fred for the captaincy? The choice has made me uncomfortable all along and I don’t just say that in hindsight. Christ, if only Vaughan had had his bloody operation a couple of months earlier. If only. And I don’t mean for his batting.

  • Fancyclown wrote:
    December 7th, 2006 at 9.32 pm

    “This does bring up yet another question about Flintoff’s captaincy; can he really act against his nice guy image to make the difficult choices?”

    From this account it appears so. I got the impression from the summer tests that Strauss had more faith in Panesar than Flintoff. He seemed to go to him more in pressure situations while Flintoff instead over bowled himself.

  • The Ashes Blog wrote:
    December 7th, 2006 at 9.42 pm

    Blame Freddie…

    After copping it for the past few days, coach Duncan Fletcher is now saying that it was Freddie Flintoff’s decision to play Ashley Giles instead of Monty Panesar:
    “The Courier-Mail has learned that at team selection meetings in Adelaide, Fl…

  • Irim wrote:
    December 7th, 2006 at 11.09 pm

    Jesus, Mary and Joseph. No wonder the team is such a mess.

    I find it extraordinarily difficult to believe that Duncan Fletcher would allow himself to be overruled by Flintoff. It goes right against what we’ve seen of his character - he’s one of the toughest, most stubborn men around. This smacks more of the Fletcher camp trying to ease the pressure on him by ‘leaking’ that story. I cannot imagine a coach giving way to his captain, and certainly not this coach. It doesn’t add up. And a coach should have carried the can in silence, without shopping his captain and creating even MORE divisiveness amongst the team before a crucial test. The damage that’s going to be done to Flintoff’s reputation remains to be seen.

    And players do NOT *select* other players. Keep in touch with the selection committee by email/phone/whatever. Graveney was there, for God’s sake. This is NOT a playground game. Get a selection board of 5-7 - I understand England’s is only 3 - and give the coach and captain a VOICE, NOT a VOTE. They can advise, but they MUST be free of the final choice so that there is no resentment directed towards them. I believe Australia has a system like that; maybe Scott or another Aussie can help me out and correct me if I’m wrong.

    But whilst you DO have a team selection committee, Geraint Jones, whose position with the team is in question, should not be on the ’selection committee’ Jones - despite his knowledge and age. I cannot see him making a case for Chris Read, saying, “Fair dues, mate, he’s better than I am. Freddie, we can still have our beers with Shane after the Tests.”

    Actually, perhaps these losses were a blessing in disguise - it brought this to light, which means there’s a chance it will be sorted, and the England team can move onwards and upwards from here.

  • Kathy wrote:
    December 7th, 2006 at 11.29 pm

    I appreciate your arguments, Irim, but I do find it hard to believe that Fletcher is this dour, negative, conservative, controlling character, who was only kept in check by Vaughan’s strong and positive personality. Despite his facial expression, he hasn’t come across to me as you describe. And if he’s been such a crappy coach, why has England developed so well under him and why did Buchanan give Fletcher’s book to his players as required reading in their preparation for this series?

    My feeling is this: that FLetcher and Vaughan together built a positive, successful, tightly-bonded team whose achievements culminated in last year’s Ashes victory. However since then Fletcher has had a bastard of a job trying to hold things together under very trying circumstances. Instead of moving onwards and upwards with the same tightly bonded unit who believed in their own abilities and those of their team-mates, he’s had one crisis after another. Vaughan, Trescothick, Jones, Giles, Flintoff, the injury list was appalling. The captaincy changed at least three times and is still not settled. The team has never become settled or bonded since. They have a rookie, barely fit captain on the most trying and stressful tour imaginable. Their senior opening batsmen departs abruptly with depression. Selection issues are tricky and terribly divisive. Suddenly it’s all Fletcher’s fault. I don’t buy that. All things considered, I’m amazed they played as well as they did on the first four days at Adelaide.

  • Doctor Gonzo wrote:
    December 7th, 2006 at 11.49 pm

    How on earth can Geraint Jones be considered a ’senior player’? If that’s true, and Jones is involved in selection matters - when his inclusion is by no means a certainty - then England haven’t a hope. In fact they deserve to lose.

  • SpryCorpse wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 1.52 am

    All the signs of yet another team smashing to pieces on the rock of an Australian Test tour.
    Always a delightful sight! :-)

    Here’s to Perth bringing the final nail in the coffin….

  • 13thMan wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 3.12 am

    You may find this interesting:
    http://www.theage.com.au/news/columns/scapegoat-on-menu-if-cupboard-is-bare/2006/12/07/1165081089053.html
    I agree with the good doctor: if the Poms are really allowing Jones to exert selection pressure, they’re mad. If he’s not good enough for a central contract, he’s not good enough to make those crucial decisions. Sure: ask him for pitch reports, but leave it at that. it appears that a boys’ club is running the team. In which case, you may as well go home now.
    SpryCorpse has it spot on: This is marvellous theatre. No-one self-immolates like the English

  • Tony.T wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 3.25 am

    This just in: Martyn retired, effective immediately.

  • SpryCorpse wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 3.46 am

    Wow!
    His dropping would not have been entirely unexpected, but retirement!
    Mind you, the manner of his last Test innings made me think that, in his own mind, the writing was on the wall.
    Someone else has already mentioned Jaques as the likely replacement. Any other possibilities? Hodge? Any 23-year old tyros ready to step in that I’ve failed to notice?
    Watson will be crying in his tear-filled beer now….

  • Tony.T wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 3.50 am

    Hodge has just got injured. Bad timing.

  • Tom wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 5.47 am

    Symonds and Voges into the 13-man squad. Jaques has been batting poorly recently, while Voges is dominating.

    Voges is a decent player, a worthy successor for Martyn. However I think with the preference for an all-rounder in the team, Symonds will get the nod and move into number 6. Furthermore he can turn a game in hours; similar to Peitersen or Gilchrist.

  • Irim wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 7.42 am

    Of course there have been a lot of problems beyond Fletcher’s control - I’m not denying that. And I’m taking issues with his actions, not his facial expression. For example, why pass the blame off onto Flintoff a week before the team have to play in a crucial Test to ease the pressure on himself? As you pointed out, Flintoff’s already struggling. You just don’t do that, no matter how much heat you have to take, if the team is your top priority. A real leader shoulders the blame, says “I’m sorry, I was wrong,” and moves on - if he had done that, people might have said, “Stubborn old goat,” but they would have respected him.

    As I’ve said before, Duncan Fletcher did a great job rebuilding - but his apparent stubbornness is undoing all his good work, and I think it’s fair for people to criticise that.

    And most of my post took issue with the form of selection. Geraint Jones, in particular, has NO business being on a selection committee when his place is one in question. I suggested a setup more like the Australian one b/c it seems fairer and it seems to work.

  • AgainsTTheWall wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 8.45 am

    Whatever the truth of the matter, Fletcher was foolish (and cowardly) to try to pass the buck for Giles’ inclusion. As if the media pack did nt have enough to chew on already this revelation may well destroy the tour. Fletcher (or anyone else) should make absolutely no further comment on team selection and the side must win in Perth. Things might then get back on track. In an ideal world Freddy would fall on his sword and Strauss take up the captaincy but I guess thats just expecting too much.

  • Caroline wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 11.43 am

    This is not altogether a surprise, and makes some sense to me, but not exactly a useful thing to be public knowledge. Geez, imagine how the boys must be feeling now! Unless they’ve got more sense than to listen to the media misrepresentations. But they can’t ditch Freddie now, unless Vaughan has a really strong claim to a place, which is not yet the case. Since taking over the Captaincy Vaughan appears to have learnt to use his calm nature to bring out the best in his players by demonstrating his confidence in their ability and professionalism - a very difficult thing to do in current circumstances, but I reckon he would still do it. Dear old Fred is playing by instinct, and not really planning his responses in a measured way.
    On Geraint Jones, I confess I know little about Read, but I think Jones is a great team man - he has kept well on this tour (admit one mistake on the last day, but that’s not that big deal for me) and I haven’t seen or heard anything about Read’s batting which inspired me so far. The main thing I remember about Read (correct me if I’m wrong here) was an altercation on the boundary in a county match a while ago, where he lost his temper. Jones seems to be a team player through and through, and in the absence of any significant difference in form, I would agree with Dunc and pick him time and time again over some twerp who spits the dummy under pressure and seems more interested in his own prospects than the team’s. OK - I may have the wrong guyin mind, but I’m sure you will tell me toot sweet if that’s the case . . .

  • Kathy wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 3.34 pm

    Againstthewall, this is what makes me angry — you talk about a “media pack” and about “destroying the tour”. It amazes me the kind of brutality being shown by this “media pack” who are attacking like a pack of dogs, attacking their own national team and if there is any “destroying” of the tour going on, it is by the media and by a lot of the fans as well.

    This is what it seems to me you English do when your team is down — you proceed to stick in as many knives as possible, then twist them as hard as you can. Then, if there isn’t enough twitching and bleeding going on, you give the team a thorough kicking for good measure, then threaten to chop off its head. And maybe its arms and legs as well. That’s bound to make them play better!

    It makes me sick listening to it. These people are human beings, under a great deal of pressure already. You want them to play better — give them a bloody break, and maybe even a tiny modicum of support.

  • Irim wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 4.28 pm

    May I lighten the thread a wee bit by plumping for Alec Stewart’s return to the team, since there isn’t a Lilac Hill entry yet? I wasn’t only convinced by his performance, but also (perhaps especially!) by this picture:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/6220158.stm

    Cheeky monkey!

    Meanwhile, all the best to Damien Martyn - especially after all he went through, the hard work he put in and the pleasure of watching him bat. What a gracious exit.
    Thank you, Damien - I raise my coffee mug to you now, but later it’ll be a G&T!

  • Irim wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 4.31 pm

    ps - I didn’t realise it didn’t go straight to the picture I meant - it’s number 5! Sorry about that.

  • AgainsTTheWall wrote:
    December 8th, 2006 at 8.09 pm

    Kathy, when I say ‘destroy the tour’ perhaps I might have better said ‘destroy the team’. The so-and-sos will seize upon any internal rift and ‘run with it’ (as they say). DF has gifted them the opportunity of the tour - at a time when the team should be uniting the press will niggle away at this wound….and if Geordie Steve does nt exdigitate and give Freddy his gonads in the next Test then that could become another sorry tale that has legs.

    In defence of the English sport supporter I dont know any who would not support their team to the (usually) bitter end as long as they demonstrate some professionalism and a TOTAL and uncompromising commitment to the cause…..on Tuesday England went down without a ripple. One way and another English sports fans put shed-loads of money the way of our best sportsman and we are entitled to comment harshly on their failings(and that includes the press who are fans like the rest of us). Too often and too long have Englismen had to witness our best sides being outplayed by countries who dont have half our potential - and yes I include Australian cricket in that!

    Having said all that this English side have shown that they can bounce back so Im not yet ready to write them off. Come on you whites (and Monty)!!!!

  • Comments

    Receive email updates on new comments


    « Who would have thought all those words could translate into action? | Main | Damien Martyn announces retirement »