My only complaints have to do with our boys giving away their wickets – Strauss in particular, who really needs to bed in and lead from the front. I could cope better if he had KP’s personality, but he doesn’t – he’s thoughtful, intelligent and steady most of the time, and he just seems to be losing his head. Bell and Cook are young, one can forgive them (well, a bit) some impatience. As for Bell, he has progressed so quickly, he’s unrecognisable from last year’s “Deer in the headlights walking wicket” – and he gave us a hard fought half century in the first match.
Strauss just seems AWOL at the moment…and we need the player who scored big innings in 2005 – both to shape the match and to steady the ship – back again. Can’t help but wonder if the captaincy wouldn’t have done that for him.
Now that’s Test cricket!
By Scott 4 years ago, at the start of December Add your comment below
Right then, that’s the sort of cricket I want to see.
Tough, hard as nails, no mucking about, just getting in down and dirty.
Before we have any complaints that England ‘batted slow’, I just want to point out that it used to be always like this. Steve Waugh’s first day as captain was in the West Indies and Australia crawled to be 6 for 174 at stumps on Day 1. Off the full 90 overs. Of course, you don’t want to rush when you are facing Walsh and Ambrose.
And Australia went on to win that game by a mile.
No, today’s play was classic cricket, at its best. The Adelaide Oval was packed, the pitch was perfect, so it was just head to head between batsmen and bowlers. And a lot of what we saw in Brisbane flowed through to this game. England can bat well enough, but they just let themselves down with poor concentration. Strauss, Cook and Bell all gave their wickets away, after playing themselves in. These guys just have to kick themselves, because they’ll never get a better place to bat.
Not that it was that easy out there, because Australia did bowl well. Clark was the pick of the bowlers, even though he was confused as to why he didn’t bowl more. To be honest, I wasn’t entirely surprised myself- Clark was bowling beautiful lines and all, but you want to be bowling Lee in conditions like this. Lee bowled plenty of rubbish between his best bowling, and that is actually more likely to get you a wicket
That’s how Bell got himself out.
Even though England have had a strong day, as an Australian I’m not too worried yet. Once both sides have had a bat, it will be easier to tell who is placed the best. Australia’s batsmen are good at concentrating as well, and if England back themselves to score 450, Australia’s game-plan will be to first get something like that themselves, then, if possible, to build a first innings lead and try to erase the worry of a fourth innings chase.
But having said that, it has been a very good day for England and they will sleep well tonight.
Tags: adelaide-oval, alastair-cook, andrew-strauss, ashes, australia, brett-lee, courtney-walsh, curtly-ambrose, england, ian-bell, slow, steve-waugh, stuart-clark, west-indies |
5 Responses to “Now that’s Test cricket!”
December 1st, 2006 at 11.03 am
December 1st, 2006 at 12.31 pm
Too true, Irim.
I also notice that Lee is having his little no-ball problem again, oh dear
No complaints about the dogged way Colly has been playing though – I have see Boycott batting! Aaaah, real Test cricket, lovely Test cricket!
December 1st, 2006 at 2.47 pm
I know why Stuart Clark bowled so few overs – it was cause Ricky Ponting got him confused him with Michael Clarke who bowled 10 overs in the last session. [:d]
December 1st, 2006 at 3.08 pm
I have to say I expected better from our openers on that pitch, but I spent the best part of the morning thinking “I can’t wait to see Collingwood and KP out there.” Didn’t have to wait too long! At tea I was thinking that 240 for 3 would be a good result for England so I’m well pleased. And 266 isn’t that bad a score on the first day against Australia is it?
Btw, I love the “Cluster Map,” but I can’t believe there aren’t more cricket fans in Northern Siberia?
Think I’ll add one to my site – please come and visit if you want to read about a load of poms whinging about life in China.
December 1st, 2006 at 6.26 pm
A very solid day for England, even if it fell a bit short of what might have been accomplished with the bat, even if a lot of us are scratching our heads over Monty not being in the squad. First, it’s disconcerting to see Strauss fail three times in a row for small scores, and Cook get out just as he is getting played in. Second, on that fairly benign wicket England should have got to 300 runs. Still, those are minor concerns in the big scheme balanced against the immediate need to show that the crushing defeat at Brisbane was not a good indicator of the relationships between the teams.
What was excellent was how Bell and Collingwood showed discipline and patience (old test cricket virtues) to blunt the Aussie attack. At 45-2 with the unknown Stuart Clark looking very dangerous and uncannily McGrath-like England could have had another batting disaster on its hands. Instead a solid platform was built from which the highly entertaining and energetic post-tea counterattack was launched.
Very nice to see Bell get another controlled, organized, patient 50. Too bad it wasn’t more, but he’s showing a lot of class and poise at #3, and more importantly a refusal to be anyone’s victim. What a difference 18 months makes. What we saw in his batting against Pakistan is being underscored, and an Ashes ton will surely be coming soon. The selectors were absolutely correct to persevere with him.
Collingwood’s ability to adapt his play to the needs of the situation made him the perfect foil for Pietersen’s last hour smash-and-grab raid. In fact, even though he’s the junior partner in that pairing, if you look at his contribution he added quite a few runs himself. It just seemed like he was doing a lot less run-accumulating than Pietersen because of his lower-key approach. It’s too soon to say he’s got the measure of Warne, but he played him extremely well back-to-back, which is far more than I’d expected.
For day 2 nothing less than a total of 450 will do. 500 would be nice. 550 even better. All followed by a late-evening full-bore go at their openers. A smooth and sensible start followed by putting the Aussies back on their heels. Set the stage so that when Flintoff and Jones come in it will be about piling on the pressure. Make Ponting pay for only having four front-line bowlers. Make him either bowl McGrath a lot and risk his suspect heel breaking down or bowl his part-time spinner (Clarke, who actually did a pretty decent job) or his part-time medium-pacers (Hussey and himself) in a stock role to give Lee, Clark and Warne breathers. And run the risk of getting carted by England’s 4-5-6-7. Which will be just fine with me.
Anyway, this day was much more like it. While one day’s quality play doesn’t make a series it does show that there’s going to be a real contest for 5 matches. We wanted an Ashes rumble. England showed it’s got lads with mettle who can stand up to the Aussies on their turf and not back down, which was a big “?” without Vaughan, without Trescothick, without Simon Jones. If we can just get it right with the ball (“paging Grievous Bodily Harmison, not his pod-person imposter double”) this series can go the distance with every game being meaningful.
Comments
« Live: Australia v England, 2nd Test, Adelaide, 1st day | Main | Interview with Billy Birmingham »


