im guessing you didn’t get her number
Wily fox Fleming
By Will 2 years ago, mid-October Leave a comment on this post
I watched and commentated on New Zealand and South Africa today, and much to my surprise I actually found it bearable. Shock'n'horror. Anand Vasu has written a really good verdict which you should read immediately at that interwebsite thing called Cricinfo.
Incidentally I met a girl yesterday afternoon who works for the online Ad agency who deal with nPower. I told her who I worked for and, as ever, she sort of mouthed "Cric? Innnfooo? Cricketinfo? Cricinfo?". Is it that difficult to comprehend? Cric. Info. Cricinfo dammit!
Tags: cricinfo, icc-champions-trophy, new-zealand, south-africa, stephen-fleming |
9 Responses to “Wily fox Fleming”
October 16th, 2006 at 6.35 pm
October 16th, 2006 at 7.20 pm
She’s the friend of a girl I’m seeing. So that’ll be a NO then!
October 16th, 2006 at 8.27 pm
Got the impression that Patel was turning it a long way. Is he good or was it a krumbler?
October 16th, 2006 at 8.44 pm
He looks a very useful one-day bowler, certainly. Straight, sends it through quite flat - he was excellent today albeit on a favourable pitch. Looks a bit one-dimensional if anything
October 17th, 2006 at 1.30 am
A just bearable game, Will? It was the pick of the tournament so far, I’d say. People tend to underestimate NZ but the one-day game is certainly our strength and we’ve won this tournament before. I’d say if you combined England’s test form with NZ’s one-day form that you’d have a world beater.
October 17th, 2006 at 1.37 am
Npower’s online ad agency doesn’t know what Cricinfo is?
Gotta worry about their interactive srategy.
As regards the match… NZ showed the application England needed to show yesterday. If one England player had scored 80, we would have seriously scared India.
October 17th, 2006 at 4.07 am
Ricky Ponting and Graham Smith should watch and learn from the great man. Fleming is in a class of his own, when it comes to captaincy. Surpassing even Steve Waugh , in my book.
October 18th, 2006 at 2.40 am
Interestingly, Michael Vaughan, in his book Calling the Shots, goes on at some length about his admiration for Stephen Fleming, and says he modelled his captaincy on Fleming’s style. I’ll just quote a bit of it here:
“Fleming is very thoughtful and I am particularly impressed by how he goes about his job in such a calm manner. When I got the England job, I said I would do it my way, but my way was more a Fleming way than a Hussain way.
“Fleming kept his cool in all situations. He never seemed to get flustered, wave his arms around, kick dirt, hurl his cap on the floor or show any noticeable emotion if players made mistakes. He just controlled everything in a measured fashion although he obviously had harsh words to say in the sanctuary of the dressing room. His team on the field always appeared to have a huge amount of respect for him.
“When I went back to Yorkshire after one England game as captain, he sat me down [Fleming had a brief stint playing for Yorkshire at the time] and asked me how I was finding it. It was all new to me and I just said I was trying to learn as I went along, but that I couldn’t believe the amount of criticism I was taking especially when people said I was too laid back, calm and casual for the job.
“Fleming just said: `Don’t listen to that, it’s a lot of hot air.’ He said he got it in the neck from Martin Crowe during his first 18 months in the job, with Crowe constantly in the media saying Stephen wasn’t tough enough and didn’t show enough emotion on the pitch. Fleming said to me that emotion doesn’t win you games of cricket. He told me he liked the way I was dealing with things on the pitch, that my mannerisms were pretty similar to his and that he guessed that we were pretty similar people — laid back and playing the game as we saw it; trying to be as professional and thoughtful as we could but realising it’s not the be-all and end-all.”
Doubly interesting stuff to me, as a supporter of both England and New Zealand, and as a commentary on captaincy. Fleming has been unchallenged captain of NZ for so long that he is part of the furniture. And like Vaughan, he unfortunately seems to be better appreciated by those outside his country than within. Of course cricket takes a distant second place to rugby in this country, as it does to football in England. A huge deal here too, though, when the Aussies are beaten.
Vaughan’s and Fleming’s comments on captaincy also made me think, again, that Flintoff is not the man to captain England. He is the team’s champion, but not its leader — there’s a big difference.
October 18th, 2006 at 6.11 pm
Tasty piece of observation, Kathy.
Like many others, I’m a big fan of Fleming’s captaincy and can see the similarities between him and Vaughan.
I have a bit of a conspiracy theory about how Freddie got that captaincy in the first place; I think they’d have rather given it to Strauss but saw giving it to Freddie as a way to make him stay for the third test (Mrs F was with child if you remember).
As far as I’m concerned I think Flintoff is an able deputy who may one day grown into a tactically astute captain. At the moment he is a leader, in my eyes; I leader by example.
Comments
« Treading the catwalk, McGrath style | Main | Shoaib and his steroids »
