Quotehanger

  • "I think their minds were already on the plane home. I am just not sure they were here to play today."
    Jamie Siddons on Bangladesh's performance in the last league match of the Asia Cup

    Jul 4, 2008

  • Recent Posts

    Try DVD rental for £3.99 per month!

    The headlines



    Who should be in England’s Ashes squad?

    By Will 2 years ago, mid-September Leave a comment on this post

    It’s very simple: who should be in England’s squad to tour Australia in November? It’s the most important squad announcement since, well, whatever. It’s huge. You get it, we all get it.

    Should Jon Lewis get a chance? Has Stuart Broad shown enough? And who will you have as captain; Strauss or Flintoff?

    All that kind of thing. I’m not around much today so leave your opinions and let’s work out the squad.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , |

    22 Responses to “Who should be in England’s Ashes squad?”

  • Chris wrote:
    September 11th, 2006 at 12.56 pm

    I’ll kick proceedings off then with the following:

    A.Strauss (Capt), M.Trescothick, A.Cook, I.Bell, K.Pietersen, P.Collingwood, A.Flintoff, C.Read, G.Jones, S.Harmison, M.Hoggard, M.Panesar, S.Mahmood, + 1 more batsman + 1 more fast bowler, + 1 more spin bowler

    I’d opt to take a 7th batsman with serious question marks over Trescothick! With Cook in the side we’ve a ready made replacement as opener, but we’d need someone reliable in at 4 or 5 to prevent Pieterson and Collingwood getting too high in the order!

    Hence my remaining 3 candidates would be…wait for it:

    M.Ramprakash, S.Broad, J.Dalrymple!

    How’s that for controversial? …but you can’t ignore a man who, despite being 37 years of age, now knows his game inside out; and who has scored over 2000 runs at an average of 105.28! ;-)

  • Pamela wrote:
    September 11th, 2006 at 2.01 pm

    Well, re: captaincy - I think it definitely should be Strauss! The Guardian and BBC support Freddie while the Telegraph support Strauss, but I think Fred might have a bit too much on his shoulders, especially as he hasn’t played international cricket for months. Interestingly, the professionals seem to fancy Freddie, while us lay people want Strauss.

    I don’t think Broad’s shown enough - he might do well in later years, though - but though Tresco’s been a bit dodgy over the past few months, you can’t go into an Ashes series IN australia without him, can you!

  • Emma wrote:
    September 11th, 2006 at 2.15 pm

    I’m not convinced you need the extra batsman in the main squad. I can’t see Trescothick being left out - don’t want to see him left out - and if he is, then Cook has proved to be a more than capable opener. With a group in Perth, I don’t think they need anyone else there. If I were to take someone else with them, I don’t think I would take Ramprakash. He’s an excellent county performer, no doubt, but his Test average is well below par, and I think it’s too much of a risk.

    I agree with our main squad, and with your choice of captain. Before Flintoff’s selection in India, I believed Strauss to be the right choice, and whilst he did an excellent job in levelling the series, I still believe in spreading workload.

    As I wouldn’t take the extra batsman, I’d want to take two extra quicks and a spinner. I’m torn between Giles and Dalrymple, it must be said, but unless the former can prove his fitness before the series then it should be an easy choice. As for quicks… I like Broad, but if he’s not going to get a game, and will in Perth, that’s where I’d send him. Anderson, if fit, I would definitely give a place. Lewis, too, is a tempting option.

  • Chris wrote:
    September 11th, 2006 at 2.59 pm

    I hope Trescothick plays and plays well, all this talk of ‘mental health’ problems is not ideal preparation, and the press will be onto him should he have a poor start! Leaving him out leaves our middle order seriously exposed, and I’d like to have some experience in there; although I know Ramps isn’t the right option, there doesn’t seem to be anyone else out there just yet!

    I don’t see Lewis playing if Hoggard is fit, the conditions won’t favour traditional swing bowling, and we should use both Hoggard and Panesar as our ‘control bowlers, with Harmison and Mahmood as our ’shock’ bowlers.

    The decision to take Broad would be to gain experience, you’re right I don’t think he’ll play a big part in this Ashes, but he could be a big part of the next 3 or 4 Ashes series! …but Anderson is a good shout if he’s fit and getting some overs under his belt!

    I predict that most of the pitches will be spin friendly anyhow, seeing as Warne was the most effective Australian bowler, and that the Aussies will play both Warne and McGill at every available opportunity to make the most of Englands fragility against top quality leg spin bowling.

  • Jim wrote:
    September 11th, 2006 at 3.41 pm

    Right.

    Trescothick
    Strauss
    Cook
    Pietersen
    Bell
    Collingwood
    Flintoff (Capt)
    Shah
    Read
    G Jones
    Mahmood
    Plunkett
    Anderson
    Harmison
    Hoggard
    Panesar

    Mahmood’s done enough with the ball in Test cricket, and I still cling desperately to the hope of seeing Anderson in 2001/2002 form. You have to back talent - these two are the most likely to take 5 wickets in an innings amongst their rivals. Plunkett just gets the nod over Dalrymple and Giles.

    There is no point in taking Giles just in case we want to go with two spinners in Sydney. Even if we did, we’d throw him in raw (presumably off the back of a couple of warm up games). He’s bowling left arm spin - he’s not a batsman. You don’t come back after 12 months, just picking the ball up again. He’ll need to bank a shit load of overs before he’s ready to play grown-up cricket again, and he won’t get them before the SCG. Dalrymple to me looks like the 2006 version of Vic Marks - useful 1 day player, but not good enough in either department at the top level.

    Flintoff replaces Collingwood from the Oval side at Brisbane. That’ll be it. Geraint Jones will be back in the reckoning by Boxing Day.

  • Justcoz wrote:
    September 11th, 2006 at 4.57 pm

    Trescothick
    Strauss
    Cook
    Pietersen
    Bell
    Collingwood
    Flintoff (Capt)
    Read
    Mahmood
    Anderson
    Harmison
    Hoggard
    Panesar
    Dalrymple (plays in Sydney)
    Broad
    Joyce

    In Perth
    Giles
    G Jones (no need for 2 keepers in the main party)
    S Jones (depending on his rate of rehab)
    Vaughan
    Plunkett

    Not easy

  • Mickysfriend wrote:
    September 11th, 2006 at 5.31 pm

    Strauss (C)
    Cook
    Bell
    Butcher
    Pietersen
    Collingwood
    Flintoff
    Read
    Panesar
    Harmison
    Hoggard
    Broad
    Yardy

    There should be also strong claims for Pietersen to take up arms and train to be a wicketkeeper. It would calm his temperment and add an extra bowler or batsmen as required. A stronger batsman at wicketkeeper is better than a really strong keeper who is an average bat.

    My line up may change if Flintoff is voted in Captain but i don ot think he will.

  • sez wrote:
    September 11th, 2006 at 6.15 pm

    I’d bring Butcher or Ramprakash back, although not both. Buctcher didnt do much wrong before he got injured and is still 34..younger than hayden and langer and martin …and ramprakash is in the form of his life and has a record against the aussies. Forget any rubbish about looking back and not looking forward, and about looking to the future…im recommending this based on cold logic…if collingwood/bell cant buy a run and we’re 2-0 down..they are the best replacements…and i’d even say in the abscence of vaughan you may be able to squeez them into the top 6 for brisbane..and if trescothick isnt touring then we definitly need to do this..as it will provide some much needed experience.

    It just comes down to who you’d prefer to deal with Lee bowling 90mph at one end and Warne bowling into the rough at the other..an out of form collingwood or an experienced Butcher.

    David Graveneny please take note.

  • Jon wrote:
    September 11th, 2006 at 8.51 pm

    Flintoff (capt)
    Strauss
    Trescothick
    Cook
    Pietersen
    Collingwood
    Bell
    Shah
    Read
    Foster
    Panesar
    Dalrymple
    Harmison
    Hoggard
    Mahmood
    Broad

    on standby: Giles, Anderson, Plunkett

    I’d go for the bowlers that are fit. Flintoff is the exception, but he should be the only one. The others will be close by in any case. Dalymple won’t scare many of their batsmen, but could be a good foil for a more attacking Monty in a two man spin attack and if they need to be defensive (hope not) bolster the batting and play instead of Monty.

    A fit Anderson would get the nod over Broad, but Plunkett wouldn’t. But if Anderson is in the team, I can’t see who bats 8. As it is, Sajid: you’ll have to keep working on your batting because you’re batting 8. We need 5 bowlers, especially with Flintoff captaining and coming back from injury.

    Foster is there instead of Jones because Jones has had such a dip in form. He’s toured Australia before and is a far better keeper and batsman since he last played.

  • Alexander wrote:
    September 11th, 2006 at 11.52 pm

    1st choice XI:

    Strauss (Capt)
    Trescothick
    Cook
    Pietersen
    Bell
    Flintoff
    Read
    Harmison
    Anderson
    Hoggard
    Panesar

    +Collingwood, Shah, Key (batting)
    +Mahmood, Lewis, Broad (seamers)
    +Dalrymple (spinner-cum-batsman)

    (In that order)

    Bring Yardy in for the ODIs and possibly the World Cup, with Cook and Panesar dropping out.

    I’m afraid the King of Spain has had his day. Key is there to cover for Trescothick, but I have to admit that particular choice smacks of my own bias as I’m a Kent man. Since losing two stone he’s had a rotten season (remember what happened to slim Inzamam at the 2003 World Cup? stout batsmen are meant to be that way). Still, he has a double century to his name in Tests and showed some grit against the Ozzies last time we toured. I feel a bit sorry for Collingwood, and perhaps at the SCG he should get the nod over Cook as he plays spin well, with Bell moving up to No.3. Obviously he’d get a game if (God forbid) Freddie gets injured again. Shah comes in for Bell if the latter reverts to previous Ashes form. Lewis for Hoggard if he gets injured, Broad or Mahmood for Harmison or Anderson. On a uniformly happy and uncontroversial note - everyone so far has included Panesar in their first-choice XI. Now who’d have predicted that when Gilo first got injured? At least one slot is settled.

  • Michael wrote:
    September 12th, 2006 at 2.04 am

    Without trying to pick a squad (I haven’t seen enough of most of the probables/possibles other than snippets on Fox at some dead ordinary hour of the night), some thoughts - will Harmison be fit and even if fit, will he travel well? He is (or at least was) a notoriously bad tourist. That may be an increasing problem as the summer wears on.

    Chris (above) thinks the pitches will be prepared to suit spin. Sorry, old sausage, highly unlikely to happen. Sydney will spin - it has for decades. Melbourne will spin but only toward the end as the pitch deteriorates. Adelaide will be like Mum’s ironing board - a gazillion runs, and unlikely to be much spin. Brisbane will seam, especially if there’s a bit of rain about. Perth in recent years has not been the lightning quick track that it once was, but there was a reason McGill left WA for Sydney and it wasn’t the view of the Harbour Bridge. We are all looking forward to seeing Monty - I am sure that there will be the usuual moron element that might try to wind him up a bit, but the bleating about crowd hostility is all a bit overdone, and I doubt that it will bother him too much. Flight and drift, as much as raw turn, are the keys.

    There seems to be a lot of agonising over the captaincy - the role played by Fletcher seems to be quite different to that of, say, Buchanan - he seems to have a considerable influence on most aspects of the game, which inclines me to the view that it probably doesn’t matter that much. If Freddie is captain, there may be a risk of him overbowling himself, but other than that there is little to pick.

    The third quick is interesting, and may be the difference between the two sides. In the absence of Jones, there seems to be some fragility. Aus were well served by Clarke against a very ordinary SA, and I suppose loyalty, if not form , will cause Gillespie and Kasprowicz to be considered. One of Mahmood, Anderson Plunkett or Broad will need to perform if it is assumed that, over the series, McGrath and Lee on one side and Harmison and Hoggard on the other all stay fit and each have their moments.

    As much as I admire Giles for the way he played in 2005, I am struggling with the idea that he might repeat that again, especially given his prolonged absence. Finding a backup for Monty for Sydney (and, perhaps, Melbourne)who can bat a bit sounds like the question and Dalrymple sounds like the answer.

    The general view seems to be that Read is a better keeper than Jones. He must play. Runs from a keeper are a luxury, not a necessity. The second best keeper must tour - if that is Jones, fine.

    Trescothick? I am beginning to doubt whether he can be regarded as a first choice opener, especially on a long tour.

  • ClannZú wrote:
    September 12th, 2006 at 6.42 am

    Marcus Trescothick.
    Andrew Strauss.
    Alastair Cook.
    Kevin Pietersen.
    Paul Collingwood.
    Ian Bell.
    Andrew Flintoff (captain).
    Chris Read (wk).
    Steve Harmison.
    Matthew Hoggard.
    Monty Panesar.
    James Anderson.
    Sajid Mahmood.
    Chris Tremlett.
    Jamie Dalyrmple.
    Geraint Jones.

    Back-up :
    Simon Jones.
    Michael Vaughan.
    Ashely Giles.
    Liam Plunkett.
    Rob Key.

  • japaddy wrote:
    September 12th, 2006 at 9.28 am

    pick anybody, just don’t pick Ramprakash or Butcher.

  • shandy wrote:
    September 12th, 2006 at 10.09 am

    1 strauss (c)
    2 tres
    3 cook
    4 bell
    5 pieterson
    6 collingwood
    7 flintoff
    8 read (wk)
    9 hoggard
    10 harmison
    11 panesar
    12 mahmood
    13 davies (wk), though i reckon they’ll pick geraint jones
    14 dalrymple
    15 broad
    16 tremlett

    on standbye… s jones, plunkett, giles, ramps/butcher (prob butch as fletcher knows him) and one more…key i reckon

  • Bill Cluff wrote:
    September 12th, 2006 at 10.27 am

    my eleven for the first test:

    -Strauss (c)
    -Trescothick
    -Cook
    -Pietersen
    -Bell
    -Flintoff
    -Read
    -Tremlett
    -Harmison
    -Hoggard
    -Panesar

    If Tremlett is not picked in the touring squad I may well cry. I simply cannot understand why he has only been mentioned twice in this discussion. He is tall and will get wicked bounce in Australia. He has an outstanding record and having performed the 12th man duties for 4 of last summers 5 Ashes tests he deserves a go. His time is now - and his record in the latter part of the county season simply demands inclusion. Lewis - good bowler that he is in English conditions - will struggle in Australia, Mahmood bowls too many 4-balls (but may be worth playing on the bouncier tracks), Plunkett needs to prove fitness but should tour and Broad, whilst he is a very good prospect for the future should travel to Perth to gain experience in Australian conditions but should not be included in the Test squad unless there are injuries and circumstances dictate we need to take a gamble later in the series.
    If anyone can give me a valid reason why Tremlett should not tour - please enlighten me.

  • Craig wrote:
    September 12th, 2006 at 10.29 am

    it wont matter who you send

  • Paul Jackson wrote:
    September 12th, 2006 at 1.01 pm

    I’m astonished that people are still calling for Ramprakash to be picked.

    He has played 52 tests and only averages 27.32. Does he really deserve another chance ?

    He’s a great county player but 52 tests is enough to show he can’t do it.

    I would not take Giles. By all means plant him in Aussie club cricket as a third option if he is bowling well. But, you can’t take someone in the Ashes party who has not played for a year. Dalrymple gets my vote as second spinner.

    I don’t think I’d take Trescothick but I expect that they will. His record overseas is poor. His record against the Aussies is poor. He’s had a terrible summer and now he is ill. I’m not sure who I’d take instead; probably Key or Joyce.

    Fast Bowlers: Hoggard, Flintoff, Harmison, Mahmood and Broad.

    Paul

  • shandy wrote:
    September 12th, 2006 at 3.18 pm

    some very poor picks in the squad announcement i just listened to… way to many crook players… did we leaqrn nothing from the past series humiliations? and what about the fiasco that was the lions tour…having effectively a squad of 30 or so is lunacy… we won it with 13 last time if you include tremlett who didnt play, … or 14 if you include gary pratt! how silly the selectors have been. plunkett, giles, anderson all in… and freddie captain… very worrying decisions. should have been strauss. we have only included 1 spinner… and only lat week we were told that perth was showing strong signs that the deck would crack and turn… oh deary me.

  • Justcoz wrote:
    September 12th, 2006 at 5.34 pm

    All the talk of Perth spinning seems like hype to me. Bet its the normal trampoline it has been since Lillee and Thomson.

  • Sean wrote:
    September 12th, 2006 at 8.21 pm

    Justcoz - last I heard about Perth was that it’s lost a bit of pace and no no more than a bit of a road.

    My source was Goochie summarising on TMS last Friday night.

  • taylor hughes wrote:
    September 26th, 2006 at 2.01 pm

    taylor hughes will pay a very lage part in this years ashes

  • matt cook wrote:
    January 21st, 2008 at 12.24 pm

    taylor hughes is proberly one of th emost impresing younge crickets who is out there at at moment i hope that he will play a large part in englands next ture

  • Comments

    Receive email updates on new comments


    « All very football | Main | What has Twenty20 done to D/L? »