Quotehanger

  • "Fitness is a relative term. I mean to say that it does not necessarily mean that one who runs hard and lifts weights is fit. Cricketing fitness is different. So if you can perform, it means you are fit."
    Sourav Ganguly provides his unique take on what constitutes fitness

    Jul 19, 2008

  • Recent Posts

    Try DVD rental for £3.99 per month!

    The headlines

    The news

    TWC



    India v England, 1st Test, Nagpur, Day Two

    By Will 2 years ago, at the start of March Leave a comment on this post

    (Day one comments)

    Despite Chris’ Burnt Bail comments that it’s a “nothing sort of score”, I think 246 for 7 is way below the mark. I suppose, given England’s farcical preparations, it’s about as good as they could expect. India, however, must be sitting pretty happy - especially given the ironing board-flat pitch. My Indian colleages at Cricinfo must be laughing their backsides off by now. Anyway, it’s day two - so by the time I wake from my pit, I expect to see a flurry of comments to keep me up-to-date! Chat away like the cricket-starved wallies you are.

    Tags: , , , |

    20 Responses to “India v England, 1st Test, Nagpur, Day Two”

  • RJ wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 5.06 am

    What a major, but expected, turnaround! I posted a comment on D1 within the first few hours showing England’s RPO of a healthy 5.29.

    Its now about the same time as D1 and the RPO is a pale 2.68 in comparision. But Colly holding out thus far.

  • Pratik wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 5.32 am

    Harmy says, “It’s not over yet.”

  • Sean wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 6.29 am

    Morning all - I wake up as Colly hits a six to take him to 99 andthen a four to take him to 103. Nice way to wake up.

  • Pratik wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 7.40 am

    Awfully quiet here today. The Englishmen are missing a truly great knock from Pollingwood.

  • Jess wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 8.10 am

    Actually managed to watch some cricket this morning, thanks to my local gym.

    And now Sehwag is out! Oh ye of little faith…

  • Wraye wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 9.34 am

    Morning all,
    was awake and listening early this morning. Wow! PC wouldn’t start though. Am now gloating in the office!

  • Christopher wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 9.51 am

    Great to watch my mandatory half hour this morning with my weetabix and see Sehwag get out. Was hoping to see Panesar in action, but all I saw was a woeful bit of fielding. Anyway, I wonder if last night’s dream of Blackwell and Jones getting big centuries in the second innings will come true. Methinks not.

    Wraye and RJ, thanks for visiting my blog yesterday. It was nice to get a couple of comments.

    http://www.legitfront.blogspot.com

  • Wraye wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 10.24 am

    Those are some amazing skyscrapers, Christopher!

    How do you rate our chances of a wicket before stumps? Come on all, let’s praise Jaffer to the skies ;) he’s bound to be out then.

  • Christopher wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 10.33 am

    My prediction: Jaffer caught bat/pad for 52 of Panesar. Dravid follows next over to Blackwell off his first delivery in Test cricket. Yes, I am a Somerset fan.

  • The Googly wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 12.26 pm

    Collingwood and Jaffer

    Paul Collingwood and Wasim Jaffer stood out on the second day of the first Test between England and India at Nagpur. Collingwood finally made his maiden century. When I’ve watched the highlights I’ll post some more thoughts, and I’m particularly

  • Fancyclown wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 12.29 pm

    Panesar can bat and occupy the crease, which helped Collingwood get his century. What was all the talk about him being hopless?

  • Christopher wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 2.59 pm

    Fancyclown - thanks also for visiting my site. You know, I’m really touched that you lot take the time to comment on my blog as well. Do none of you have work to do? No, me neither.

    I thought they would always play Panesar from the moment they took him to India. He’s that rare thing in England - a wicket-taking spinner. Udal would have just been used as rest for the seamers. Come on Monty!

    http://www.legitfront.blogspot.com

  • Fancyclown wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 4.01 pm

    “Fancyclown - thanks also for visiting my site.”

    Feel free to visit mine Christopher

  • Tykrane wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 5.55 pm

    anyone know why trescothick flew back?

  • R J wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 6.12 pm

    Since everyone’s talking on everyone else’s blog, I’ll put me hat in the fray in response to Tykrane’s query on Tresco’s return.

    Not Just Cricket: India v England 2006: The Trescothick Story

    Not Just Cricket: India v England 2006: England in all sorts with 4 days to T1

    Whatever it may be. I hope it gets sorted and England can make use of Tresco’s talent at the very earliest.

    Cheers

  • Zainub - Zany wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 6.47 pm

    Tykrane,

    I suppose a Sun or Mirror correspondent could be ivestigating that as we speak, and the news might be out by the mid/end of this tour, who knows, at the moment though, the reasons for him flying back will remain “undisclosed personal” ones, and I respect his privacy, so no special ivestigations from my side on finding why…

  • Jess wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 7.06 pm

    I’m with Zany - it’s none of our business. Whatever it is, I hope that it can be resolved.

  • Sean wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 7.43 pm

    What Jess & Zany said.

  • Will wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 7.47 pm

    Watcha, Sean. How’s tricks?

  • The Googly wrote:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 9.27 pm

    The languid class of Steven Harmison

    Steve Harmison’s gem of an innings was a rare highlight for England on the second day at Nagpur

  • Comments

    Receive email updates on new comments


    « Flintoff’s decision not to be at the birth | Main | Abdul and his radio »