<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There&#8217;s nothing wrong with South African domestic cricket</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/</link>
	<description>Peering down the corridor of uncertainty.  It's about cricket, sport and journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:54:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-186312</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 11:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-186312</guid>
		<description>she is fit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she is fit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mubashir</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-175461</link>
		<dc:creator>mubashir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-175461</guid>
		<description>Dear God, what levels I have sunk to. I promise, one day, Iâ€™ll resume writing on this blog and not swearing profusely. Or posting pictures of massively attractive bok women.

But wait, look! More cheerleaders at the cricket! Canâ€™t see the MCC or Lordâ€™s being persuaded though, can you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear God, what levels I have sunk to. I promise, one day, Iâ€™ll resume writing on this blog and not swearing profusely. Or posting pictures of massively attractive bok women.</p>
<p>But wait, look! More cheerleaders at the cricket! Canâ€™t see the MCC or Lordâ€™s being persuaded though, can you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wraye</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18379</link>
		<dc:creator>Wraye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18379</guid>
		<description>Reasons to be cheerful Part II: Simon Jones has been voted 9th sexiest man on earth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reasons to be cheerful Part II: Simon Jones has been voted 9th sexiest man on earth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18378</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 20:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18378</guid>
		<description>About five years ago I remember observing that the typical female audiences at Aus/SA games were young and invariably scantily clad whereas at England games it was more &quot;grandma &amp; her knitting&quot;.

Since then of course English cricket got, for want of a better word, sexy and the twentysomething (and younger) female audiences are a very welcome addition to the crowds in my view (with the exception of the &quot;gels&quot; who treat Lords as a Henley or an Ascot).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About five years ago I remember observing that the typical female audiences at Aus/SA games were young and invariably scantily clad whereas at England games it was more &#8220;grandma &amp; her knitting&#8221;.</p>
<p>Since then of course English cricket got, for want of a better word, sexy and the twentysomething (and younger) female audiences are a very welcome addition to the crowds in my view (with the exception of the &#8220;gels&#8221; who treat Lords as a Henley or an Ascot).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RL</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18348</link>
		<dc:creator>RL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 20:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18348</guid>
		<description>This is already done in England though - they&#039;re called the npower girls, and Freddie Flintoff married one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is already done in England though &#8211; they&#8217;re called the npower girls, and Freddie Flintoff married one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wraye</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18336</link>
		<dc:creator>Wraye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 11:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18336</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I laughed when I saw the photo. No offense taken. Most of the best bloopers in cricket are loosely based jokes on sex and I find them funny too. Maybe I&#039;m odd.

I once took my top off at a game and stopped play. Mind you, I did have a beetle in my bra and the club players fell about with laughter. If I blogged about my womens cricket, I&#039;d have the whole world laughing at me, but I don&#039;t think I&#039;m ready for that yet! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I laughed when I saw the photo. No offense taken. Most of the best bloopers in cricket are loosely based jokes on sex and I find them funny too. Maybe I&#8217;m odd.</p>
<p>I once took my top off at a game and stopped play. Mind you, I did have a beetle in my bra and the club players fell about with laughter. If I blogged about my womens cricket, I&#8217;d have the whole world laughing at me, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m ready for that yet! <img src='http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan R</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18334</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18334</guid>
		<description>To put this issue in perspective, a couple years ago I opened up a copy of &quot;The Cricketer&quot; I&#039;d bought and discovered that it contained a near-nude photo of a male cricketer (Jim Troughton, I think, covered with nothing but strategically placed batting gloves, which his fully clothed wife was wearing while standing next to him).  Not my cup of tea, really, but I didn&#039;t get angry about it. 

In a way I think the cherleader photos are more relevant than this photo was, because while Troughton is a genuine cricket athlete, the photo was not of something one is likely to see at a cricket match. If one goes to a Nashua Titans cricket match in South Africa, one presumably will see what was posted to this blog.  Fair game, in my mind.

While Jess may have a point about the lack of coverage of women&#039;s cricket here, there&#039;s a whole bunch of cricket stuff which doesn&#039;t normally get covered here - not just the women&#039;s game. Personally, I wouldn&#039;t mind reading a good blog about women&#039;s cricket, but only if the blogger had a genuine enthusiasm for the women&#039;s game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put this issue in perspective, a couple years ago I opened up a copy of &#8220;The Cricketer&#8221; I&#8217;d bought and discovered that it contained a near-nude photo of a male cricketer (Jim Troughton, I think, covered with nothing but strategically placed batting gloves, which his fully clothed wife was wearing while standing next to him).  Not my cup of tea, really, but I didn&#8217;t get angry about it. </p>
<p>In a way I think the cherleader photos are more relevant than this photo was, because while Troughton is a genuine cricket athlete, the photo was not of something one is likely to see at a cricket match. If one goes to a Nashua Titans cricket match in South Africa, one presumably will see what was posted to this blog.  Fair game, in my mind.</p>
<p>While Jess may have a point about the lack of coverage of women&#8217;s cricket here, there&#8217;s a whole bunch of cricket stuff which doesn&#8217;t normally get covered here &#8211; not just the women&#8217;s game. Personally, I wouldn&#8217;t mind reading a good blog about women&#8217;s cricket, but only if the blogger had a genuine enthusiasm for the women&#8217;s game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innocent Abroad</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18333</link>
		<dc:creator>Innocent Abroad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 10:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18333</guid>
		<description>I see the cheerleader still hasn&#039;t figured out how to turn round...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the cheerleader still hasn&#8217;t figured out how to turn round&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dog</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18332</link>
		<dc:creator>dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18332</guid>
		<description>Putting the tit back into titans. Been missing ever since Cullinan left &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting the tit back into titans. Been missing ever since Cullinan left &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18328</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18328</guid>
		<description>Due to public demand(!), I&#039;ve reopened comments. So the case is open again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to public demand(!), I&#8217;ve reopened comments. So the case is open again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18327</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18327</guid>
		<description>Hey, Jess. Guess what. Easy solution. If you don&#039;t like the content, &lt;b&gt;then don&#039;t look at it&lt;/b&gt;!  No-one is forcing you.  Go and find a website that  doesn&#039;t offend you and let everyone else alone. It&#039;s not sexist - the sexism is in your mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Jess. Guess what. Easy solution. If you don&#8217;t like the content, <b>then don&#8217;t look at it</b>!  No-one is forcing you.  Go and find a website that  doesn&#8217;t offend you and let everyone else alone. It&#8217;s not sexist &#8211; the sexism is in your mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18308</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18308</guid>
		<description>Women&#039;s cricket isn&#039;t as big as men&#039;s. Fact. I work for Cricinfo, and take *very* seriously all aspects of cricket; women&#039;s, men&#039;s, and the minor countries. I run this &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.cricinfo.com/btw&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt;, for example, with my boss.

So don&#039;t accuse me of ignoring women&#039;s cricket. I might not write about the women&#039;s game an awful lot here, because I don&#039;t find it particularly interesting and I&#039;m perfectly entitled a) to that opinion and b) to write whatever I wish.

Case closed, sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Women&#8217;s cricket isn&#8217;t as big as men&#8217;s. Fact. I work for Cricinfo, and take *very* seriously all aspects of cricket; women&#8217;s, men&#8217;s, and the minor countries. I run this <a href="http://blogs.cricinfo.com/btw" rel="nofollow">blog</a>, for example, with my boss.</p>
<p>So don&#8217;t accuse me of ignoring women&#8217;s cricket. I might not write about the women&#8217;s game an awful lot here, because I don&#8217;t find it particularly interesting and I&#8217;m perfectly entitled a) to that opinion and b) to write whatever I wish.</p>
<p>Case closed, sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18307</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18307</guid>
		<description>And I&#039;ll develop a sense of humour about blatant sexism when I&#039;m not constantly on the receiving end of it.

So there^2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;ll develop a sense of humour about blatant sexism when I&#8217;m not constantly on the receiving end of it.</p>
<p>So there^2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18306</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18306</guid>
		<description>&quot;Calm down&quot;

No!  I refuse.

&quot;You yourself would like to see â€œpictures of half-naked boys as well.â€ Double standards?&quot;

Not at all.  You post about men&#039;s cricket all the time - &#039;tis a cricket blog, duh.  But the only acknowledgement of women is pictures of hotties.  So, either posts about women&#039;s cricket, or pictures of gratuitously-scantily-clad men!

So there.

Just be grateful that I didn&#039;t actually post what I wrote initially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Calm down&#8221;</p>
<p>No!  I refuse.</p>
<p>&#8220;You yourself would like to see â€œpictures of half-naked boys as well.â€ Double standards?&#8221;</p>
<p>Not at all.  You post about men&#8217;s cricket all the time &#8211; &#8217;tis a cricket blog, duh.  But the only acknowledgement of women is pictures of hotties.  So, either posts about women&#8217;s cricket, or pictures of gratuitously-scantily-clad men!</p>
<p>So there.</p>
<p>Just be grateful that I didn&#8217;t actually post what I wrote initially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18305</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18305</guid>
		<description>Clearly you have no sense of humour. Here&#039;s what I said initially:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Dear God, what levels I have sunk to. I promise, one day, Iâ€™ll resume writing on this blog and not swearing profusely. Or posting pictures of massively attractive bok women.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This ought to have implied the off-topic nature of the post, as well as my finding the photos funny and amusing. And yes, attractive. Not sure what&#039;s wrong with that, but if you don&#039;t like my attitude then I apologise. Those that know me will be finding this all very amusing, as am I!

You yourself would like to see &quot;pictures of half-naked boys as well.&quot; Double standards?

Calm down</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly you have no sense of humour. Here&#8217;s what I said initially:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Dear God, what levels I have sunk to. I promise, one day, Iâ€™ll resume writing on this blog and not swearing profusely. Or posting pictures of massively attractive bok women.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This ought to have implied the off-topic nature of the post, as well as my finding the photos funny and amusing. And yes, attractive. Not sure what&#8217;s wrong with that, but if you don&#8217;t like my attitude then I apologise. Those that know me will be finding this all very amusing, as am I!</p>
<p>You yourself would like to see &#8220;pictures of half-naked boys as well.&#8221; Double standards?</p>
<p>Calm down</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18304</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18304</guid>
		<description>Sorry - you don&#039;t see the problem with this?  F***ing hell, we have further to go than I thought.  I could spell it out for you, using very short words that I&#039;m sure even a bunch of chauvinist pigs would understand, I suppose.  But really, I thought you were better than this, Will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211; you don&#8217;t see the problem with this?  F***ing hell, we have further to go than I thought.  I could spell it out for you, using very short words that I&#8217;m sure even a bunch of chauvinist pigs would understand, I suppose.  But really, I thought you were better than this, Will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18303</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18303</guid>
		<description>Ah, I&#039;m glad you enjoyed the lady photos. Well, not all of you but can&#039;t win &#039;em all I guess!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed the lady photos. Well, not all of you but can&#8217;t win &#8216;em all I guess!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan R</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18296</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18296</guid>
		<description>I had a look at the flickr page (purely out of interest in the South African cricket game, of course). What&#039;s clearer from other angles (among other interesting things) is that those white socks they&#039;re wearing are actually miniaturized leg guards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a look at the flickr page (purely out of interest in the South African cricket game, of course). What&#8217;s clearer from other angles (among other interesting things) is that those white socks they&#8217;re wearing are actually miniaturized leg guards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18293</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18293</guid>
		<description>Well you didn&#039;t have to look :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you didn&#8217;t have to look <img src='http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18289</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18289</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s &lt;i&gt;outrageously&lt;/i&gt; sexist and patriarchy-enforcing of you, Will.

I&#039;ll only forgive you if you post pictures of half-naked boys as well, in future.

Humph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s <i>outrageously</i> sexist and patriarchy-enforcing of you, Will.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll only forgive you if you post pictures of half-naked boys as well, in future.</p>
<p>Humph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innocent Abroad</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18288</link>
		<dc:creator>Innocent Abroad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18288</guid>
		<description>Will, &lt;i&gt;promise&lt;/i&gt; me you&#039;re not going to post a photo of what they threw on the ground next...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, <i>promise</i> me you&#8217;re not going to post a photo of what they threw on the ground next&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sports : life magnified :: Protea domectic cricket rocks :: January :: 2006</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18287</link>
		<dc:creator>Sports : life magnified :: Protea domectic cricket rocks :: January :: 2006</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18287</guid>
		<description>[...] Will has brought to focus an aspect of South African cricket I was unaware of.    Posted in Cricket, General stuff, South African Cricket &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Will has brought to focus an aspect of South African cricket I was unaware of.    Posted in Cricket, General stuff, South African Cricket | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarun</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/comment-page-1/#comment-18282</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2006/01/30/theres-nothing-wrong-with-south-african-domestic-cricket/#comment-18282</guid>
		<description>I am searching for a cricket and my passport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am searching for a cricket and my passport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
