<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calamity and disaster all over the world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/</link>
	<description>Peering down the corridor of uncertainty.  It's about cricket, sport and journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:26:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan R</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-10995</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 07:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/#comment-10995</guid>
		<description>Did you really expect Australia to have trouble playing the Windies at home?  I think the match might have been closer if the Aussies had won the Ashes, but in getting beaten they learned some lessons, added some youth, and came out fired up. If the Windies are true to form, Lara will score a double century at some point - probably when it can&#039;t help them win. But otherwise they&#039;re overmatched.

As for England, is it ever easy to win on the subcontinent?  England was awesome on the green swinging wickets at home with a healthy Simon Jones, but they are in totally different conditions, and probably fatigued from the travel and change of environment and food.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you really expect Australia to have trouble playing the Windies at home?  I think the match might have been closer if the Aussies had won the Ashes, but in getting beaten they learned some lessons, added some youth, and came out fired up. If the Windies are true to form, Lara will score a double century at some point &#8211; probably when it can&#8217;t help them win. But otherwise they&#8217;re overmatched.</p>
<p>As for England, is it ever easy to win on the subcontinent?  England was awesome on the green swinging wickets at home with a healthy Simon Jones, but they are in totally different conditions, and probably fatigued from the travel and change of environment and food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-10864</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/#comment-10864</guid>
		<description>Huh, you see, all you have to do is complain about it, and voila - there it is.  O well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, you see, all you have to do is complain about it, and voila &#8211; there it is.  O well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-10863</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/#comment-10863</guid>
		<description>Found it - it was being moderated!  If you include a link in your comments then I have to approve it, which is a bind, but there we go.  Woo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found it &#8211; it was being moderated!  If you include a link in your comments then I have to approve it, which is a bind, but there we go.  Woo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-10862</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/#comment-10862</guid>
		<description>What time did you do it Jess - and on which post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What time did you do it Jess &#8211; and on which post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-10861</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/#comment-10861</guid>
		<description>Hmm, your blog seems to have eaten my last post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, your blog seems to have eaten my last post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-10859</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/#comment-10859</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/4413590.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eeek&lt;/a&gt;.  Hopefully Vaughan isn&#039;t out for the entire series - that would be a Bad Thing.  

Caroline - I saw that too, and was wondering what on earth was going on.  And yes, hoping against hope that we weren&#039;t really 76/7, or whatever it was at one stage.

Of course we&#039;ll all be up early for the series!  (Ulp...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/england/4413590.stm" rel="nofollow">Eeek</a>.  Hopefully Vaughan isn&#8217;t out for the entire series &#8211; that would be a Bad Thing.  </p>
<p>Caroline &#8211; I saw that too, and was wondering what on earth was going on.  And yes, hoping against hope that we weren&#8217;t really 76/7, or whatever it was at one stage.</p>
<p>Of course we&#8217;ll all be up early for the series!  (Ulp&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-10852</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/#comment-10852</guid>
		<description>Indeed not.  I&#039;ll be up with the larks at 4am for the Pakistan tour - as I trust will everyone here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed not.  I&#8217;ll be up with the larks at 4am for the Pakistan tour &#8211; as I trust will everyone here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-10832</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/#comment-10832</guid>
		<description>Seems that Vaughan is limping along too now.  Will, you must promise not to go away again, at least not until the end of this series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that Vaughan is limping along too now.  Will, you must promise not to go away again, at least not until the end of this series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caroline</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-10829</link>
		<dc:creator>caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 05:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2005/11/06/calamity-and-disaster-all-over-the-world/#comment-10829</guid>
		<description>Did anyone see the BBC and ECB scorecards on the web during the first day&#039;s play with Pakistan A?  During the first session they both had England batting and 7/76.  Then at lunch the BBC scorecard changed to have Pakistan A batting and 7/76, with Vaughan taking three catches, Hoggard two wickets, etc.  About half an hour later the ECB scorecard changed to the same thing, yet both sites had articles about England&#039;s batting collapse.  I was getting my hopes up that it was a hoax, and Pakistan A were actually batting, but then in the second session the scorecards changed back to England collapsing . . .  alas.  But what actually happened?  Was someone tampering with the web sites or what?!  I might add that I don&#039;t think Cricinfo ever changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone see the BBC and ECB scorecards on the web during the first day&#8217;s play with Pakistan A?  During the first session they both had England batting and 7/76.  Then at lunch the BBC scorecard changed to have Pakistan A batting and 7/76, with Vaughan taking three catches, Hoggard two wickets, etc.  About half an hour later the ECB scorecard changed to the same thing, yet both sites had articles about England&#8217;s batting collapse.  I was getting my hopes up that it was a hoax, and Pakistan A were actually batting, but then in the second session the scorecards changed back to England collapsing . . .  alas.  But what actually happened?  Was someone tampering with the web sites or what?!  I might add that I don&#8217;t think Cricinfo ever changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
