Love sport? Try betting on your favourite team and win!

 


Twitter

 

Recent Posts

Cricket news



Fantasy Cricket

Flintoff wants to sing. Professionally

By Will 5 years ago, mid-October Add your comment below

Oh for God’s sake, what’s wrong with cricketers these days? First it’s Darren Gough kissing his England career goodbye, and now Andrew Flintoff wants to be a singer. There really is no peace for the wicked…

But far more alarming for the nation’s cricket watchers is the revelation that Flintoff has told his new singing teacher that he would gladly give up cricket to sing professionally.

Flintoff’s vocal coach is Jon Christos, a rising opera star who was approached by the cricketer after performing at a charity ball in Manchester three weeks ago.

And to further baffle the mind comes this: 500 comments have now been posted about Kevin Pietersen. All this attention cricket is receiving is just not cricket…

UPDATE: And from Royaltech comes this:

A pair of diamond cricket ball studs valued at £25,000 and the diamond encrusted cricket bat that hangs around his [Pietersen's] neck was worth a measly £50,000.

Are today’s cricketers dabbling in the murky world of Football-esque extravagance?

Tags: , , , , , , , , |

16 Responses to “Flintoff wants to sing. Professionally”

  • Harry wrote:
    October 9th, 2005 at 2.18 pm

    my respect for him has gone down. How can anyone be that good at cricket like singing better!?? I’m near damn hopeless and would sooner play cricket naked in the snow in front of 100,000 then sing in the damn shower.

  • Jess wrote:
    October 9th, 2005 at 2.43 pm

    Re. Kevin Pietersen: I’m not sure it’s his cricketing prowess that most of those girls are interested in…:D

    As far as Flintoff’s singing (if you can call it that) is concerned, I’m not sure his taste in music goes down that well in the dressing room, if Harmy’s comments are anything to go by.

    *snigger*

  • monique wrote:
    October 9th, 2005 at 3.17 pm

    OMG noooo freddie cant sing he cant give up cricket he is the best england have!!!!
    monique
    xooxxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxo LUV KP xooxoxoxoxoxxoxoxo

  • Will wrote:
    October 9th, 2005 at 5.18 pm

    I hear you, Harry, and I agree!

  • Jess wrote:
    October 9th, 2005 at 7.51 pm

    “Are today’s cricketers dabbling in the murky world of Football-esque extravagance?”

    As long as his performances on the pitch are up to scratch, why is it an issue that he has a daft haircut and wears jewellery? Frankly, he can wear lipstick and false eyelashes as far as I’m concerned.

    Maybe you young whippersnappers don’t remember the times when we had no middle-order batsmen worthy of the title?

  • Will wrote:
    October 9th, 2005 at 8.06 pm

    Elaborate, Jess.

  • Jess wrote:
    October 9th, 2005 at 8.30 pm

    Elaborate on what? The middle-order batsmen comment? Yes, I probably should have said more, but I hate it when comments get long and out of control…

    I don’t know about anyone else, but I used to watch Tests a few years ago, and once our top three (often not even three) got out against decent opposition it was often the case that I’d end up burying my head to avoid watching the middle-order capitulate like lemmings. It didn’t always happen – but it certainly happened often enough to be memorable. Particularly against the Aussies. Ian Bell is a perfect example of the kind of thing I’m thinking of. He was brilliant – on fire – up to the Ashes, and failed almost completely to show that kind of form. It’s like a mental block. At least with KP and Freddie at 5 and 6, you at least sit there thinking ‘well, one of them will do something special’. And they did pretty much every time. I honestly think we need a bit of flamboyance in there somewhere, and if it doesn’t get the rest of the team’s backs up (which it hasn’t seemed to so far) then who cares about the bling?

    jx

  • Shaun wrote:
    October 10th, 2005 at 8.44 am

    “I’d quit cricket to sing for a living, says Flintoff”.
    Sounds rather like Sir Clive Woodward, who once said that he would rather have played and coached poofball (I mean football) than rugby. The rugby public was not best pleased.
    It’s funny how successful sportsmen denigrate the sport that brought them recognition and success.

  • Elliott wrote:
    October 10th, 2005 at 11.46 am

    “what’s wrong with cricketers these days?”
    Its not all cricketers!! Just the you Poms! ;)

  • dave_v wrote:
    October 10th, 2005 at 1.32 pm

    Lets hope Freddy was still p1ssed when he came out with the comment he would give up cricket for a singing career….although I bet “Stars in there Eyes” will be on the phone to his agent.

  • Zainub wrote:
    October 11th, 2005 at 1.08 pm

    Jess “As long as his performances on the pitch are up to scratch, why is it an issue that he has a daft haircut and wears jewellery?” Certain peoples’ eyes are very sensitive; they hurt every time they catch a glimpse of a dodgy hairstyle. Other people have got sensitive digestive systems – if they have just tuned in to watch a game of cricket after having fine cuisine of lunch, watching a daft hairstyle for them can lead to a range of mild to moderate gastro-intestinal disorders, including vomiting. Something like a mullet or skunk therefore is potentially dangerous.

    Re: Flintoff … very amusing.

    Sorry for being so selfish, but does this mean he too might pull out of England tour to Pakistan, isn’t there any show on BBC called Strictly Come Singing? Would he be eligible to participate in EURO Vision Singing Contests or whatever those programs are called, I’ve heard about them before from England fans. Anyway, I cannot comment, I’ve never heard Andrew sing before; although I know he’s a bit of a classical man as far as his musical tastes are concerned, likes listening to Radio 2, so could be interesting. It’ll be a great loss to world cricket, but you never know, he might well in the end make a decent enough singer.

  • Jess wrote:
    October 11th, 2005 at 1.31 pm

    roflmao, Zainub. I’d never thought of it that way. Mustn’t offend people’s delicate sensibilities. Although, if they’re that offended by mullets, they must never watch the Aussies.

  • Zainub wrote:
    October 11th, 2005 at 8.13 pm

    Definately, watching the Australians for those senstive tummy / eyed people is by no means easy task, but it helps that Dizzy Gellispie is no longer in the team. Also, helmets aren’t just useful inventions for batsmen and close in fielders, but also for those sensitive cricket fans.

    A helmet ensures that you will be exposed to the sight of skunk only when KP takes his one off, it ensures that most if not all of Shane Watson’s flashies will also remain unvisible to the human eye. However there is less guarantee for the senstive stomach-ed people, if the helmet unfortunately goes off just after lunch/tea/quick snack …then there isn’t much hope.

  • Pat wrote:
    October 15th, 2005 at 10.30 pm

    Freddie is in danger of becoming cricket’s Gazza.

  • Rasesh wrote:
    January 17th, 2006 at 7.47 pm

    These days the cricketers have an interest in many things other than cricket, but i dont think it should be taken negatively .
    But the idea of freddy singing is absolutely absurd :(

  • fdgsfdg wrote:
    January 25th, 2007 at 5.47 pm

    hi..good site..by..

  • Comments

     


    Receive email updates on new comments


    « | Main | »