Love sport? Try betting on your favourite team and win!

 


Twitter

 

Recent Posts

Cricket news



Fantasy Cricket

Justin Langer: it’s a game, not war

By Will 5 years ago, at the end of July Add your comment below

Found via Cricinfo:

“You’ve still got to have the courtesy to say: ‘Are you all right mate? You OK?’ I said to a number of their players: ‘This isn’t a war, this is a game’.”

Justin Langer after Ricky Ponting was hit in the cheek by Steve Harmison on the first morning at Lord’s. Ponting’s cut from the grille of his helmet required eight stitches

The only question I’d ask would be: why? Have Glenn McGrath, Jason Gillespie, Merv Hughes, Craig McDermott and other Aussie fast bowlers of the past 15 years be known to ask after a batsman’s health or wellbeing? I didn’t think so. It was a nasty incident, but perhaps Langer forgot that England were (and still are – I refuse to be downbeat!) up for a fight on that Thursday morning, and weren’t going to bend over backwards to see if Ponting was ok.

I can’t help feeling that the Australians aren’t great at receiving bullying tactics, but they’re past-masters at dishing it out.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , |

14 Responses to “Justin Langer: it’s a game, not war”

  • karthik wrote:
    July 27th, 2005 at 7.08 pm

    Hmm…the last time javagal srinath showed his concern after hitting ponting with a bouncer, ponting literally chased him away as though srinath was threatening to bounce the ball off ponting’s head.
    So now, the bowlers are supposed to do it just so that they can chase him away and claim that they are mentally strong blah blah blah…

    If you dont ask, you are not courteous, if you do, then run lola run!

  • karthik wrote:
    July 27th, 2005 at 7.09 pm

    that was meant to read
    So now, the bowlers are supposed to do it just so that he can chase them away and claim that they are mentally strong blah blah blah…

    sorry for the typo :)

  • Harry R wrote:
    July 27th, 2005 at 10.47 pm

    If Douglas Jardine had been Australian, and Bodyline was a tactic used by an Australia team touring England, Jardine would be an Australian sporting hero to this day. And any suggestion from the English of unsporting play would be dismissed as the reaction of ‘whinging Poms’.

    The Aussies are too damn quick to start acting as though they are somehow the keepers of the flame of true sportsmanship the moment it suits them. When it comes to cricket, they lost any claim to the moral high ground some time ago.

  • Robert Harvey wrote:
    July 28th, 2005 at 1.44 am

    I don’t think England should or can win an arms race with Austalia. Having said that good sportsmanship is in short supply. Play hard but remember this game should be respected. Australia seem to be able to dish it out but when the little dog in the fight bites back they seem bewildered.

  • Russ Degnan wrote:
    July 28th, 2005 at 4.52 am

    Well, first of all, I think you’ll find Langer was talking about the slips fielders and not the bowler. The Australian slips cordon will ask a player how they are, just as the West Indies slips cordon always used to ask how a batsman was.

    But secondly, what are the English players thinking anyway. You don’t stand there clapping and saying, “good ball, give ‘im another”. That just fires the batsman up. Much better to show a bit of concern, maybe get in his head…

    “Look, you’d better watch him, he’s quicker than he looks. Hit me in the nets the other day, my ears are still ringing. And on this pitch too, looks like it’s up and down a bit. Probably best not to try and hook. Now how many fingers am I holding up? Three, two? You sure? Maybe you should go off. Hate to have to take you to the hospital…”

  • Dave wrote:
    July 28th, 2005 at 5.19 am

    For starters I don’t think Australia were that bewildered, 2 sessions does not make a Test Match. Secondly if we had lost Langer would not be mentioning it. By doing it now he’s having a dig – ie “You all got so excited and aggro but what good did it do you”. Thirdly he loves the aggro, don’t forget his comment to Bell. Fourthly so does the rest of the team, that’s how we won, England tried to be more aggressive batting as well and paid the price. England would be better off playing the whole game like they bowled to Clarke in the 2nd innings. Frustrate the Australians and force them to play slower than they like.
    Lastly the Australians didn’t expect Harmison to apologise, and McDermott never would have, but they expected Vaughn to. Instead he stood their grinning like a Cheshire Cat. The Australian captain would have always checked to see if the batsman was OK, that includes AB. The one who couldn’t hack it was Vaughn did you see his expression change from the first 2 sessions to the rest of the match?

  • worma wrote:
    July 28th, 2005 at 8.49 am

    What I dont like is this ’selective sportsmanship’ that Aussies (players I mean) try to promote. So now, ’slip fielders are supposed to ask, but its ok for bowlers to gring or glare’ when hitting a batsman, ‘captain should not be agrresive, show concern for injury’, fielder may or may not show concern as much as captain, if a fielder curses at you (I know its normal in Aus, not in Ind) you should take it ‘in the stride’ but if the same fielder claims a doubtful catch against you, take him for his words (even when umpire is saying notout, after referal from third ump)!!

    I’m sorry but I dont think the rest of the sportsmen in the world are capable of selective gentlemanly behaviour. Its the Aussies who invented the modern ‘mental disintegration’ tactics, and I think they should be ready to face it all the time (even if its getting under S Waugh’s skin by coming late for toss ;-) ) And I think this comment from Langer shows that Eng fielders were successful in rattling him (I dont think Ponting would be thinking like this). And I think Dave is right, if Aus had lost, Langer could not have mentioned it (but the effect would have been there)

    Once again, this is just my take on Aus cricketers attitude towards this issue, nothing personal towards Aussies.

  • Harry wrote:
    July 28th, 2005 at 9.40 am

    Personally, I don’t care what they do. There’s no rules stating they have to check if the batsmans alright, the bowlers aren’t doing anything wrong when the bowl a bouncer, so why should they apoligise or check or whatever (if you want to, thats fine, but each person should make that decision for themselves without being ridiculed for whatever they want to do. I remember back in under 15’s i bowled a bouncer and hit the guy on the arm (i was only 14) and was quick to say sorry. My coach (umpire at the time) was even then quicker to tell me not to apologise! A couple of overs later i bowled a beamer (accidently) and then never said a word. The coach then informed me that’s when you apologise. And that’s how i think it should be. If they get hurt by a leagle bowl, so be it, its apart of the game. Langer should keep his mouth shut if you ask me.

  • Robert wrote:
    July 28th, 2005 at 10.40 pm

    If it had been Gilchrist who was hit in the face I think there might have been more concern for him. As I think he is most likely better thought of by England. Any thoughts?

  • Dave wrote:
    July 29th, 2005 at 12.03 am

    Worma,
    Not normal in India for fielders to curse, what about Harbajhan – by all accounts even when he’s bowling it is a constant stream of invective – apparently they’re the only English words he knows otherwise the Australians (or whoever) wouldn’t be too upset by being called Boka-Choda, or MudderChod or KankeMange would they. Anyway the whole we’re really tough attitude backfired on the English anyway. As I said before it was more to have a dig at the English than any serious concern Langer has – remember he comes from WA he’s used to being bowled bouncers.
    PS – As for Sourav Ganguly he is very effective at getting under the Australian’s skins but I think that is more because he’s actually a complete jerk than any conscious decision to try and be annoying ;)

  • Ashwin Ramachandran wrote:
    July 29th, 2005 at 6.05 am

    Lol! Dave, I recognize the second sledge in your list, but the first and third beats me. And I’ve been a champion sledger for years ;-) . Anyway, I seriously don’t think Langer or anybody else on either team expects any sympathy or concern from the opposition. The series was built up as a battle though unfortunately, only the first day lived up to that hype. But the cricket played is hard and that’s the way it should be.

    As for Saurav Ganguly being a jerk, I strongly disagree. I think he has a lot more spine and cunning than a lot of people give him credit for. Unfortunately, he has a Graeme Smith’ish tendency to rub people the wrong way with his attitude, even in India.

    Anyhoo…off the topic, if anybody’s interested in catching some of the weekend action from Sri Lanka, then I’ll be doing some intermittent live blogging, inspired by Will & Avinash ;-) . I’m in the US and the game begins at 4:30am. Hmmm, about that live blogging, on second thoughts…

  • worma wrote:
    July 29th, 2005 at 10.57 am

    Dave, I said its not normal for fielders in Ind to curse (esp in international matches). Doesn’t mean they don’t do it. In fact my earlier point here was that Aus players are seemingly preaching that these tactics are ok for fielders, and my interpretation was that yes from Aus perspective it is quite ok, because they do it naturally, and dont mean it seriously. But it should be same for captains and slip-fielders and bowlers. Not selective.

    Some interesting aspects for you to note : Indian fielders curse quite a lot now, but it ‘became popular’ from the 2001 Aus series (before that it was one-off, not a standard tactic). Even Harbhajan took off from then on. And all of them do it regularily now (whether they like it or not, they’ve accepted it as part of toughness that is requried for being globally competitive). A guy like Rahul Dravid would *never* use that sort of language in his everyday life (note :just an example).

    And yes, like Ashwin I did not recognise some of those curses :-) Anyway I know he has ‘developed’ the tendency to get under the skin of aussies, thanks to s waugh and the great disintegration plans.

    Saurav Ganguly….well you really dont want to start that discussion here, do you ?

  • worma wrote:
    July 29th, 2005 at 11.00 am

    And also, do you really think Langer was ‘taking a dig’ at Eng by these statements ? I had a feeling he was pretty serious about their ‘lack of concern’ ? If so, then I must say I was fooled by his well disguised nudge.

  • Dave wrote:
    August 1st, 2005 at 12.23 am

    Ashwin and Worma,
    The insults were Bengali, I know Harbajan is a Pathan or Punjabi, but Bengali is the only Asian language I am familiar with, so please forgive me. Sourav Ganguly would have understood them. Regarding whom – I didn’t say he wasn’t cunning or courageous, just that he’s a jerk, which I think helps with the execution of his tactics, which involve being a complete jerk. Eg I think Rahul Dravid is intelligent and courageous enough to use the same tactics but would not be believable doing so – the other teams would laugh at him because we’d know he was just acting. Whereas with Sourav you can see it’s the real deal.

  • Comments

     


    Receive email updates on new comments


    « | Main | »