I dont know how biased this may seem. Most of the good cricket has been played by Aus (most of them should have won….Langer?)…India (again, most should have won…Sehwag, Kumble ??)…and SA (in loosing cause..Kallis should have won earlier).
So, it may not be too bad after all if all those above listed have been covered, yet they could have tried to find some ‘equally deserving’ non-Eng candidates for credibility sake.
WIndies, NZ dont seem to have worthy contendors, SL…umm…Murali should have won earlier ?


