<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cricketers are ALL slimline athletes!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/</link>
	<description>Peering down the corridor of uncertainty.  It's about cricket, sport and journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:56:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: martialarts training</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-192526</link>
		<dc:creator>martialarts training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/#comment-192526</guid>
		<description>How often do you yourself swim and what stroke or do you just write about it?

Can I ask though - how did you get this picked up and into google news?

Very impressive that this blog is syndicated through Google and is it something that is just up to Google or you actively created?

Obviously this is a popular blog with great data so well done on your seo success..

Swimming greats you should write about next, my ex was an olympic swimmer!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How often do you yourself swim and what stroke or do you just write about it?</p>
<p>Can I ask though &#8211; how did you get this picked up and into google news?</p>
<p>Very impressive that this blog is syndicated through Google and is it something that is just up to Google or you actively created?</p>
<p>Obviously this is a popular blog with great data so well done on your seo success..</p>
<p>Swimming greats you should write about next, my ex was an olympic swimmer!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madison</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-70638</link>
		<dc:creator>Madison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 05:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/#comment-70638</guid>
		<description>well actually i found it rather sad 2 see riggrez face coz it looked so sad nd shocked... must have been real embarassing.... i reakon flem shudnt have sed wat he did but it waz a dam funni joke!!! altho tha jokez we ratha personal... very funni!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well actually i found it rather sad 2 see riggrez face coz it looked so sad nd shocked&#8230; must have been real embarassing&#8230;. i reakon flem shudnt have sed wat he did but it waz a dam funni joke!!! altho tha jokez we ratha personal&#8230; very funni!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fawad Asrar Qureshi</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-21798</link>
		<dc:creator>Fawad Asrar Qureshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/#comment-21798</guid>
		<description>Fleming totally lost the plot. But I never thought a player of his stature would be involved in such a foolish act. Mark was asking what his job requires him to do. yes and I agree if the &quot;REAL&quot; post match conferences are aired on TV then it will reveal a thing or two about the players</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fleming totally lost the plot. But I never thought a player of his stature would be involved in such a foolish act. Mark was asking what his job requires him to do. yes and I agree if the &#8220;REAL&#8221; post match conferences are aired on TV then it will reveal a thing or two about the players</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jez</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-21750</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 03:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/#comment-21750</guid>
		<description>If that&#039;s what Flem thinks then he should just say it. If he thinks Rihardson&#039;s talking crap then why shouldn&#039;t he say it? All the stuff prior to the outburst from Flem was negative, possibly patronising and always going to be sensitive. If Richardson thought that what he said was unfair or not true then he should have come out and said that... 

One thing it does go to show is that if there was a bit more honesty in all the pre- and post-match talking heads stuff it would make the whole thing a damn sight more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s what Flem thinks then he should just say it. If he thinks Rihardson&#8217;s talking crap then why shouldn&#8217;t he say it? All the stuff prior to the outburst from Flem was negative, possibly patronising and always going to be sensitive. If Richardson thought that what he said was unfair or not true then he should have come out and said that&#8230; </p>
<p>One thing it does go to show is that if there was a bit more honesty in all the pre- and post-match talking heads stuff it would make the whole thing a damn sight more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAZOS</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-21747</link>
		<dc:creator>CAZOS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/#comment-21747</guid>
		<description>I think Mr. Fleming forgot the contribution of Mark Richardson for his team. His (Richardson&#039;s) some 300 ball-100s saved many tests for Mr. Fleming. Mr. Fleming is regarded one of the greatest captains in the business; so, he should be more careful and thoughtful about his comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Mr. Fleming forgot the contribution of Mark Richardson for his team. His (Richardson&#8217;s) some 300 ball-100s saved many tests for Mr. Fleming. Mr. Fleming is regarded one of the greatest captains in the business; so, he should be more careful and thoughtful about his comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marshall ross</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-21707</link>
		<dc:creator>marshall ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 21:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/#comment-21707</guid>
		<description>Stephan fleming what an idiot, richardson is doing a normal interview and the questions were quite justified after a poor new zealand batting performance where fleming himself failed of course, and then stephan pulls out some abusive comments on mark as he departs, just stupid trying to take out his anger on someone else because of himself and his teams poor performance.  Mark richardson was a fine opening batsmen, i am one and strike rate is not what we concentrate on early, its giving those middle order blokes with no technique a chance by batting time, Fleming is a flukey batsmen with a poor technique and now has shown to the world his personality, what a prick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephan fleming what an idiot, richardson is doing a normal interview and the questions were quite justified after a poor new zealand batting performance where fleming himself failed of course, and then stephan pulls out some abusive comments on mark as he departs, just stupid trying to take out his anger on someone else because of himself and his teams poor performance.  Mark richardson was a fine opening batsmen, i am one and strike rate is not what we concentrate on early, its giving those middle order blokes with no technique a chance by batting time, Fleming is a flukey batsmen with a poor technique and now has shown to the world his personality, what a prick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali Rashid Cheema</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-21704</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali Rashid Cheema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 21:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/#comment-21704</guid>
		<description>I never expected such an amateur stuff from such a shrewd captain. I was a big fan of Stephen---the way he used to keep hsi composure and speak his mind in the interviews. But this one was utter crap. I don&#039;t what was in his mind. When a commentator is asking a question, he doesn&#039;t need to have a test average or strike rate to support his question. It means Holding, Waqar, Willis, etc (all bowlers) should never ask questions regarding batting? What if Boycott, Gower, Ian Chappel, etc (all batsmen) talk about bowling actions and criticise certain bowlers? I dont think Mark Richardson ask any rubbish question at all. He was totally forthright in everything. Fleming&#039;s behavior wasn&#039;t examplary to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never expected such an amateur stuff from such a shrewd captain. I was a big fan of Stephen&#8212;the way he used to keep hsi composure and speak his mind in the interviews. But this one was utter crap. I don&#8217;t what was in his mind. When a commentator is asking a question, he doesn&#8217;t need to have a test average or strike rate to support his question. It means Holding, Waqar, Willis, etc (all bowlers) should never ask questions regarding batting? What if Boycott, Gower, Ian Chappel, etc (all batsmen) talk about bowling actions and criticise certain bowlers? I dont think Mark Richardson ask any rubbish question at all. He was totally forthright in everything. Fleming&#8217;s behavior wasn&#8217;t examplary to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonx</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-21703</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 21:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/#comment-21703</guid>
		<description>i think Fleming has lost it... with the pressure of captiancy. but felt bad for Richardson coz he was doing his job and i guess he couldn&#039;t sollow the fact that a player who played under him dared to ask him these questions....man...stupid!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think Fleming has lost it&#8230; with the pressure of captiancy. but felt bad for Richardson coz he was doing his job and i guess he couldn&#8217;t sollow the fact that a player who played under him dared to ask him these questions&#8230;.man&#8230;stupid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pil</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-21697</link>
		<dc:creator>pil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/#comment-21697</guid>
		<description>i feel bad for Mark...that was rarlly awful to watch...and i could see he was also kinda shocked...i think he was doing his job..nothing wrong in that..but  Stephen Flemming..well we all knw he plays the game quiet hard...but still..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i feel bad for Mark&#8230;that was rarlly awful to watch&#8230;and i could see he was also kinda shocked&#8230;i think he was doing his job..nothing wrong in that..but  Stephen Flemming..well we all knw he plays the game quiet hard&#8230;but still..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remy</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-21604</link>
		<dc:creator>Remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 11:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/#comment-21604</guid>
		<description>Instead of commentating on commentators&#039; remarks, Fleming should be more concerned with his team&#039;s performance, which is his prime responsibility and for which he is paid.

Commentators make remarks / recommendation according to their own judgement (ofcourse, this is what they are supposed to do, and that is what others such as Holding, Gower, Chappel, Ritchie do). These comments should be taken on a positive note.

I guess Fleming over reacted (sign of a skipper who has things out of control). His own form is not upto the mark and his top three batsmen in this match are prone to falling as regularly as leaves in autumn. (team selection issue)

Nonetheless, Fleming is a fine captain and he has won great matches from desperate situations and I hope he wins this one too (Bond is the man). But his focus should be on his team and should not be distracted by what others say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of commentating on commentators&#8217; remarks, Fleming should be more concerned with his team&#8217;s performance, which is his prime responsibility and for which he is paid.</p>
<p>Commentators make remarks / recommendation according to their own judgement (ofcourse, this is what they are supposed to do, and that is what others such as Holding, Gower, Chappel, Ritchie do). These comments should be taken on a positive note.</p>
<p>I guess Fleming over reacted (sign of a skipper who has things out of control). His own form is not upto the mark and his top three batsmen in this match are prone to falling as regularly as leaves in autumn. (team selection issue)</p>
<p>Nonetheless, Fleming is a fine captain and he has won great matches from desperate situations and I hope he wins this one too (Bond is the man). But his focus should be on his team and should not be distracted by what others say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Surfer</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-21588</link>
		<dc:creator>The Surfer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/#comment-21588</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stephen Fleming attacks Mark Richardson: &#039;You&#039;re an idiot&#039;&lt;/strong&gt;

The New Zealand captain Stephen Fleming has attacked his former opener, Mark Richardson - he of sprinting in a leotard fame - for comments made after the fourth day&#039;s play against the West Indies at Auckland. The transcript read: Richardson:...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stephen Fleming attacks Mark Richardson: &#8216;You&#8217;re an idiot&#8217;</strong></p>
<p>The New Zealand captain Stephen Fleming has attacked his former opener, Mark Richardson &#8211; he of sprinting in a leotard fame &#8211; for comments made after the fourth day&#8217;s play against the West Indies at Auckland. The transcript read: Richardson:&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/comment-page-1/#comment-19284</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricket.mailliw.com/archives/2004/11/30/cricketers-are-all-slimline-athletes/#comment-19284</guid>
		<description>What a horrible sight. Just glad it&#039;s not Freddy Flintoff he&#039;s racing! Urgh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a horrible sight. Just glad it&#8217;s not Freddy Flintoff he&#8217;s racing! Urgh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
